How are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | 6嘻嘻

Assigned reviewer Dr. Marisa Kozlowski on April 15, 2024. Does anyone know how fast this reviewer is?

(0) 讚！ | bessie919

So slow

(0) 讚！ | XMG

Very fast speed

(0) 讚！ | 科研是个啥

May I ask if your review comments are all minor revisions?

(0) 讚！ | Raikiri

The review speed is fast, but unfortunately the Chinese Academy of Sciences' basic version partition is in the second zone. This is also my first SCI paper. It was submitted on October 22nd, assigned to reviewers on October 25th, received review comments on November 11th, returned with revised manuscript on November 12th, accepted on November 15th, and published online on November 18th.

(0) 讚！ | yxf425

Extremely fast speed, two weeks for minor revisions, one month for acceptance and publication. The editors and reviewers are all very friendly. Unfortunately, due to the decline of the organic chemistry discipline, the impact factor and ranking have dropped. Hopefully, next year we can regain the first tier status and maintain the impact factor, not falling below 6.1.

(199) 讚！ | 鸟doge

1.29 Initial submission;
2.12 Returned with revision comments, major revisions;
Due to the epidemic and Chinese New Year, I was at home and needed to conduct experiments and collect data, so it took me a relatively long time.
3.15 Revised;
3.23 Returned with minor revision comments;
3.28 Accepted for publication
Proofreading will take approximately 1-2 days, and the article will be published online in April.
The efficiency of Online Learning (OL) is very high, and the review process is very fast. Moreover, the reviewers' comments are very pertinent and greatly contribute to improving the quality of the article. Both reviewers gave a score of 8.
I am very grateful to the editor-in-chief, associate editor, and the two reviewers for being the first author of this article in OL.
The waiting period for submission was very difficult to endure. I couldn't help but check for updates several times a day, fearing that I might miss any new information or response that could potentially delay my graduation. Therefore, I wanted to share my experience with everyone and hope it can be of some help to those who are submitting their work.

(11) 讚！ | Lucky

Natural medicine chemistry, 2 new frameworks, submitted on March 2, 2020. Received review comments on March 12, minor revisions made on March 14, accepted on March 17, and published online on March 18.

(17) 讚！ | 兔兔焦

An article has just been accepted today. Let me share the process. The paper was submitted on the 6 August and assigned to the associate editor on the 7th. The reviewers returned the review decision on the 21st. One rejected the manuscript and said that the novelty was not enough. The other required minor revision. The editor-in-chief seemed to be interested, and said it needs major revision. I returned the paper on the 26th. Minor revision was required on the 3 September. Returned on the 4th. Accepted on the 5th. I feel lucky!

(42) 讚！ | 拉斐

Before submiting in Angwe, it was submitted for review, but it was rejected after one month, and changed to OL. After 8 days, the minor was notified. The text has been revised by the reviewer, and the SI can be modified. 3After the day, proof, the efficiency is very high.

(13) 讚！ | 1009321749@qq.com

Reply 25 days after the select, two minor repairs; 5 days later, after the repair, re-submitted, received a week to receive, the next day proof, return the same day, announced online that night.The total duration lasted about 40 days.For the high requirements of novelty, we should try our best to highlight the highlights and attract attention. The workload seems to be relatively large recently (most methodological articles have at least 20 examples), but if the novelty is high, the requirements are not so harsh and can be derived.Better ~ work and article writing expression levels are very important ~ personal feelings at least 7 points work, 3 points writing; so highlighting the article highlights is very important ~

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

The article is super fast, three weeks reply, two minor repairs, one rejection.Minor repair requirements are basically grammar, no experimental problems.The editor proposed a grammatical modification request, minor repair.Return after one day of modification, receive the next day, and proofs on the third day.Return online after two days.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

2Invested one month, 18 days to give advice, overhaul, repaired after January, minor repair, repaired after 3 days, accepted

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

I am doing naturalIf the product is separated, it is not easy to separate the new skeleton, and it is also simple to have single crystal data.It is said that OL is now going to be a new skeleton. After the DA reaction, it will not work. The requirements are stricter. The editing of

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Org lett is still very efficient.Now that JACS is more and more biased towards biomaterial applications, OL is definitely a good choice for organic synthesis.(The method of learning is the hard-working life portrayal, with blood and tears to send articles...) This submission is also to try JACS again, after ANGEW, the reviewer suggested to switch to OL.Submitted on August 20 and submitted to the editor on August 21.September 4 Return to comments 8 points, 7 points.A minor repair, a major repair.At the time of the revision, according to the opinion of my tutor, I did not follow the advice of the overhaul, but only explained accordingly.After the revision of September 6, the select was made and the editor accepted it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submission 2 articles were revised and received the first post, 3 days assigned to the deputy editor, 17 days to return to the revised comments, 2 minor repairs 1 rejected, score 8,7,4. 2 daysReturn, receive after 3 days, 5 days ONLINE.A total of 30 days.After the second submission, the deputy editor will be assigned one day, and the revision opinion will be returned in 17 days. 1 minor repair 1 major repair 1 rejection, score 8,7,5. 5 days return, 1 day later, 3 days ONLINE.A total of 27 days.After receiving it twice, there is a manuscript. The first time the person refused to submit the reason for the rejection, but there are many loopholes. I just seized the opportunity to reiterate the focus and novelty of my work..The second person who refused to submit a manuscript is not a professional, and does not understand it. At first glance,

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

is very fast and efficient.Submitted on May 16th, received on June 7th, a major repair, a minor repair on June 21st, and then on June 27th, received on June 29th, received proof, July 1st online

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

After 3 weeks, I will give comments to reviewers.A big change and a small change.I gave a week to make up the experiment and went online one week later.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has submitted three articles in the past year and was eventually acceptd. Of course, these three manuscripts tried JACS or ACIE before submiting in Organic Letters.In the past, the editor-in-chief was directly acceptd according to the JACS review comments, and published online within one week. After the second submission, about 14 days to give review comments, one suggestion to receive directly, a minor repair, and finally from submission to online publishing.It took three weeks; the third paper, about five weeks to review the comments, a minor repair, a major overhaul, the main problem of overhaul is because the reviewer did not look at the attachments directly, directly with the responsible deputy editor, the deputy editor ignoredThe opinion took about six weeks from submission to online publishing;

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Time: January 23rd contribution February 19th revision March 5th revision re-submitment March 15th reception

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

1 month repair, minor repairAfter returning, receive 2 days.One word, fast!Feel: The compound has a novel structure and must be supported by a single crystal; the activity is better and can be added.Inactivity or activity generally reduces points.It seems that the current requirements are getting higher and higher, and a new skeleton with a general structure is a bit dangerous. It is possible to throw two up.If two general new skeletons are inactive, it is estimated tragedy.So in summary, higher novelty + single crystal + good activity + good writing = receiving

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Org. lett is a very authoritative journal, the spectrum data should be full, pay special attention to the three-dimensionalConfiguration, review cycle is very short.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has been posting articles for more than a month, and I feel that I have to be rejected. The seniors said that it is dangerous for more than 25 days.555555.....

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Org. lett is a very authoritative journal with high quality requirements and requires the integrity of novelty and scientific issues.The spectral data should be complete, pay special attention to the stereo configuration, and the supporting information should be written in detail and rigorously.The editor is very responsible and the review cycle is short.If you have confidence in your research, give it a try.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名