期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS LetPub Score 7.2
56 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.5 Influence 6.7 Speed 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | ORE GEOL REV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0169-1368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 25.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ore-geology-reviews/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ORGEO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier BV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 地学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 四半期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 473每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 69.05% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0169-1368%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Slow, 6-12 Week(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 22.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 12.5 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: Peter志 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-08-29 09:03:13 評論於 My required reviews have been completed for half a month, but I still haven't received any updates. How did your article turn out?(0) 讚! | Peter志 |
作者: HAO LIU 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-06-17 10:26:18 評論於 The journal processing is very fast, with the first review result available in less than a month after submission. After the major revisions suggested in the first review, the manuscript was revised for a month and returned. Then, minor revisions were made and the manuscript was returned after a week. In the third review, the reviewers suggested some polishing before publication. After the polishing was completed, the manuscript was directly accepted within 2 days of submission. It took exactly one month from submission to acceptance, and the editor's processing speed is really nice!(29) 讚! | HAO LIU |
作者: 习惯性 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-02-15 15:51:01 評論於 I don't know, one of the top three mining journals.(0) 讚! | 习惯性 |
作者: ZHENGPENG 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-01 16:21:39 評論於 Posted on July 8, 2022, major revisions were given in September, but the actual comments mainly focused on modifying the geological background, which was partly due to my insufficient understanding of the research area. Changes were made in October, and it was directly accepted on November 27th. The journal and the editor are very fast, and there is basically no delay. Perhaps this is the benefit of being open-access? There were two reviewers, one of whom provided comments within three days, while the other was slower. If both reviewers were prompt, the paper could potentially be published in two months. Currently, although the reputation of OGR has declined, its foundation is still there. The quality is not as good as before, but it has not reached the level of minerals. Hopefully, it will continue to improve in the future!(5) 讚! | ZHENGPENG |
作者: nur 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-10-26 01:40:54 評論於 Is it easy to win currently?(0) 讚! | nur |
作者: 习惯性 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-07-11 16:26:42 評論於 Will this journal become completely open source in the future?(5) 讚! | 习惯性 |
作者: SYSU-jack chen 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-03-01 21:18:53 評論於 I am engaged in research related to isotopic dating. Due to the incomplete state of dating techniques in the research area, my work can be considered a small innovation in terms of technical methods and directions. After submitting the manuscript, it went under review within three days, and I received the reviewer's comments within a month. Both reviewers provided constructive suggestions, and the editor requested a suitable moderate revision. It took about 20 days to make the revisions due to the slower progress during the Spring Festival. There was a change in the editor after about 10 days, and the manuscript entered the second round of review within half a month. After 13 days, the second review was completed, and the status changed to "required review complete." After 6 days, the decision-making process began, and finally, today, I received the message of acceptance! OGR, as a stepping-stone journal for researchers in the field of ore deposits, has been highly efficient and responsible, from the editor to the reviewers. It doesn't require an excessive amount of flashy data accumulation; as long as your research results are relatively innovative and groundbreaking in your field and region, you can try to submit. Of course, it's even better if it's a regional summary, such as MD and EG. I hope to be able to publish an article in EG in the future! Keep going! Let's applaud for my first journal article.(70) 讚! | SYSU-jack chen |
作者: bowen 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-09-26 11:49:57 評論於 OGR is about to become a fully open-source journal, with a publication fee of $2200. Is it good or bad? For bosses who are not short of money, it is beneficial for the dissemination of articles, as open-source is definitely a good thing. For students, if the sole purpose is graduation, choosing OGR will require consultation with the boss, considering that the money can only be obtained from the boss.(31) 讚! | bowen |
作者: amwbj1990 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2021-08-25 10:31:13 評論於 Translation: Posted on 20210216, Received feedback on 20210528, luckily there was only one reviewer, and their comments were relatively normal. The editor made some revisions. Revised on 20210623. The editor raised several questions on 20210724, but still made revisions. Revised on 20210805, accepted on 0825.(1) 讚! | amwbj1990 |
作者: Geostar 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-07-02 09:52:26 評論於 On the 399th day of submission, there is still no feedback from the reviewers. Whenever asked, they say it is still under review. It has already been 59 days since the required reviewer completed it. OGR is really being messed around, haha.(11) 讚! | Geostar |
作者: 懒得起名啊 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-06-10 19:09:25 評論於 Maybe the editor-in-chief is too reliable, the processing speed is really fast.(0) 讚! | 懒得起名啊 |
作者: 梅花魂 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-06-01 16:16:16 評論於 May I ask the original poster, is the quality of the journal determined by the proportion of submissions from Chinese people? That's quite surprising. May I ask where you are from, sir/madam?(5) 讚! | 梅花魂 |
作者: 久久岁月 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2021-01-16 14:02:06 評論於 Not sour... that was chosen randomly.(0) 讚! | 久久岁月 |
作者: homerlee 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-01-08 16:35:13 評論於 Buddy, I saw the results of your submission on Asian geology. I know why you made such a sarcastic comment ^_^(0) 讚! | homerlee |
作者: 旗鼓隆冬强东强 領域: 地学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-12-31 15:29:33 評論於 I did not submit it to a special issue. Two reviewers were invited for the first review, which lasted for one and a half months, and a major revision was required; the editor found 2 new reviewers for the second review. It lasted for one month and required a minor revision. The third review was sent to one of the reviewers of the first review. It lasted for 1 months, without giving specific advice and directly suggesting an acceptance. It took nearly half a year from submission to acceptance, with a total of 4 reviewers. There are two editors in chief in OGR now, one in China and one in a foreign country. Non-special issue articles will be randomly assigned to editors. Mine was assigned to Franco Pirajno. Overall, I feel that the editors and reviewers were very good, and the comments were quite pertinent and fair. Judging from my submission experience and communication with others, the articles submitted to this journal currently generally has to undergo 2 to 3 rounds of review, with 4 to 5 reviewers. (14) 讚! | 旗鼓隆冬强东强 |
作者: 清冽的甘泉 領域: 地学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-10-19 11:07:06 評論於 It took 2 months for the first review. One of the two reviewers required major revision, and the other one suggested rejection. The associate editor returned it directly. It was resubmitted after major revision. After resubmission, it took 3 months for the first review. The reviewer who rejected the manuscript in the former review didn’t review it due to the pandemic. The associate editor didn’t find suitable reviewer, so he reviewed it in person. The other reviewer kept the decision of major revision and didn’t change it. The editor-in-chief required major revision. It took 20 days of revision, and minor revision was required. There were the revisions on the details. Two months after the submission, it was accepted, because the associate went on vacation. Summary: The editors of this journal were responsible, and worthy of one of the three major journals in the mineral deposit industry. However, compared to the other two, it's still easier, but it's still a lot harder than before. (15) 讚! | 清冽的甘泉 |
作者: Jiangong 領域: 地学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2020-08-02 23:15:31 評論於 Now it is really more and more difficult to be accepted by OGR. I wrote a manuscript related to micro-regions and non-traditional isotopes, and it was rejected without being sent for review. As one of the three major journals of mineral deposits, it has the highest impact factor in recent years, which is a bit out of reach... (17) 讚! | Jiangong |
作者: 胡滨 領域: 地学天文 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2018-09-28 16:17:16 評論於 Submitted on February 8th, 2018, acceptd on July 19th, do remote sensing geologyThe difficulty is really not big!(2) 讚! | 胡滨 |
作者: research 領域: 地学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2018-09-16 10:03:20 評論於 Niubi's journal self-citation rate is 39.7%, and it is not a vain name.(1) 讚! | research |
作者: 杨教授 領域: 地学天文 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2018-09-16 08:55:59 評論於 How does Asian geology compare with OGR?OGR's article I read the article on Asian geology never looked at. OGR's article is to look at the article with drilling information and drilling system sampling. One of the three major mineral deposit journals is not a good name than the gondwana research good gondwanaResearch editor's character value doubt OGR editor is still very nice(1) 讚! | 杨教授 |
作者: 杨教授 領域: 地学天文 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2018-09-16 08:53:15 評論於 How does Asian geology compare with OGR?OGR article I am reading, the article of Asian geology never sees 呵呵(0) 讚! | 杨教授 |
作者: 杨教授 領域: 地学天文 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2018-09-16 08:51:38 評論於 One of the three major journals in mineral deposits is better than the gondwana research.Very good water article to see OGR inside the drilling position and drilling system sampling article is still very meaningful(0) 讚! | 杨教授 |
作者: 岳云鹏 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2018-03-14 18:38:03 評論於 self-citation rate of 28%, my God!GONDWANA RESEARCH's self-introduction rate is only 13%, and some of the exercises are within 10%. ORG is now less and less bottom line.(1) 讚! | 岳云鹏 |
作者: 花花 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2018-03-11 19:36:41 評論於 A domestic Associate Editor handles my manuscript, I feel that the reviewers should be domestic, and they will be reviewed in three months or so.The comments on the review can only be sighed, there is no reference value, and I actually saw the Chinese mark.After re-editing it carefully, I switched to a better journal.(0) 讚! | 花花 |
作者: hubin763259288@163.com 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2018-03-05 16:37:44 評論於 2018 February 8th submission, the current results are unknown, the first English paper, to do remote sensing geological direction.(1) 讚! | hubin763259288@163.com |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us