I guess it might be hard to find reviewers, so I'll give you some feedback first and then wait for other reviewers slowly.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

At the end of the email was: Dr. Tahsin Tezdogan didn't let me conduct the experiment, there was just a figure from a paper, a very small subfigure. I drew it using Visio at the time, but it should have been a bit larger, which led to a misunderstanding of the network paths and channels. Then there were problems with the overall structure of the paper, nothing else.

(0) 讚！ | 理工大小钱

Another new reviewer has accepted the review on 2025.04.18. Now there are a total of four reviewers. Brother from the science and engineering field, I think the editor-in-chief might be trying to speed up the process. Who is your editor-in-chief?

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Why do I only have one reviewer? And I feel like this reviewer didn't understand my article... They asked for revisions, but the email said to upload them and a new reviewer will be assigned.

(0) 讚！ | 理工大小钱

Huh? I'm still at 4.4 rating even after all the votes I've cast.

(0) 讚！ | popopopoboboob

Record the submission time
4.16 submit
4.16 with editor
4.17 under review

(0) 讚！ | 粥壹

The reviewer who received it on April 16, 2025 has completed the review. Hopefully it's not a rejection. Please, please. God bless.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

When did you get instantly rejected after submitting your application? I submitted mine on the 4th and still haven't heard back, it's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | popopopoboboob

Boss, I was also rejected by the editor in seconds, saying it did not meet the scope of the journal. Can you submit it for review after doing this?

(0) 讚！ | BOLIN CHEN

2025.04.14 under review, send 6 and pick 1
Hoping for good news! There have been too many worrying things lately, but I still need to maintain a positive attitude. It's okay to feel sad, anxious, and discouraged, but I must not lose hope! I also hope that everyone who submitted their work will be accepted smoothly!

(2) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Return to revision after one and a half months.

(0) 讚！ | chestnutmomo

It's been five days and it's still WE. Is that considered slow?

(0) 讚！ | qutsjz

2025.4.7 First trial returned for revision with editor
2025.4.11 Currently still in with editor

After returning the revision to the editor, why hasn't it been sent to the two review experts yet?

(1) 讚！ | 祷告

2025.0410 Still with editor. Hope for a change soon, please.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

2025.04.08 Revised, with editor

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

On February 25, rc gave 20 days for revisions, and the feedback provided was very constructive, not difficult to implement.
On March 16, revisions were submitted and received with a score of 2-0-0.
On March 18, the score was 2-1-0.
On March 20, the score was 2-2-1.
On March 26, the final revised manuscript received a score of 2-2-2 from rrc.
On April 6, the manuscript was accepted.
Encountered editors and reviewers who are both compassionate and efficient!

(0) 讚！ | 呆呆呆的

Today accepted, lasting more than five months.

(0) 讚！ | 赐我心软的审稿人和编辑

Do we need to reply to the questions in the Reviewer's Responses to Questions section, or just to the questions raised in the reviewer's comments section?

(0) 讚！ | nitrox

Do we need to respond to the questions in the Reviewer's Responses to Questions section, or just to the questions raised in the comments?

(0) 讚！ | nitrox

The editing efficiency is very high, the review comments are accurate, the revision speed is very fast, it was quite a good submission experience.

(0) 讚！ | IAG..

I want to consult a senior contributor. What does CME article mean in the article type? Which one should I choose for a normal research paper?

(0) 讚！ | excellent wang

Same question, what does CME article mean? Which one should I choose for a regular paper?

(0) 讚！ | excellent wang

One reviewer directly rejected, while the other gave very positive feedback. The person who rejected didn't even finish reading my article, very irresponsible, and kept talking to himself. 

If I have original numerical methods, why would I submit to OE? I should submit to JCP or JFM. It's really speechless. According to your theory, the articles on OE are not innovative at all. Are you exceptionally talented or did the editor overlook it? 

Surely, it must be that your talent is underappreciated, and reviewing my article has underestimated your abilities! 

It is speculated that someone volunteered to help OE reduce the number of publications after seeing that the Chinese Academy of Sciences' ranking has dropped. Thank you so much for that!

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

When selecting the article type in your submission, what does CME article mean?

(2) 讚！ | mu~xi

Hello, may I ask if you are using a LaTeX or Word template for your submission? I couldn't find the Word template, only the LaTeX template. Are there any specific requirements for the Word template?

(0) 讚！ | fcfd97