Thank you to the editors and reviewers; I have made efforts to revise, but experiments take time; please confirm the time needed

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Subject: Submission Column, Article Title, Author's Pen Name. Content: The full content of the article.

Author information should be provided after the main text. This includes your real contact address, postal code, name, email address, landline phone number, mobile phone number, QQ number (please specify), and any other necessary contact information (such as a brief bio

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write a letter requesting an extension?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

What aspects should be paid attention to in the letters sent by journals?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

How long does the first review cycle last? It has been almost a month and the first review is still not over. It's really slow

(0) 讚！ | 东风谷彦露

October 14th return review comments, December 9th submit revised draft, December 19th acceptance. Correction, the official website of the journal recorded an acceptance rate of 15% in 2015. Overall, the review process is slow, but the editors are very responsible and the reviewers are professional

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢泰和

The original research content accepted by this journal includes workplace hazards in the fields of chemistry, physics, ergonomics, biology and psychology, and the health effects of environmental pollutants.

(0) 讚！ | Laura

It has been almost a month, and the first review has not finished yet. It's really slow

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢泰和

The magazine has a low annual publication rate, with few followers and slow review speed. My paper has been submitted for nearly 50 days, and the status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". Submitted on July 24th, awaiting AE assignment on July 25th, awaiting reviewer assignment on August 10th, awaiting reviewer selection on August 25th, and still awaiting reviewer assignment as of August 30th. I hope everything goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢泰和

In the past two years, I submitted a lot of articles to Chinese journals. It took almost two months for them to review and ask for major revisions. They said that although there were some issues, they would not reject it because the methodology was scientific. It took me another two months to make the revisions and they are still waiting for me. After another month of review, it was finally accepted. I learned a lot through this process and will make more preparations when writing articles in the future

(0) 讚！ | 无极彦霞

Looking at the Chinese article for a few years, I selectd for a lot. I reviewed it for two months and let the overhaul say that although there is a problem, it is not scientific because it is scientific.It took 2 months to complete the revision and still waiting for me.Received another month of acceptance.The process has learned a lot, and the next time you write an article, you will do more preparation work.

(2) 讚！ | 脊椎损伤

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The number of articles from China in this journal is decent. For inappropriate articles (about 50%), they are rejected within 1-3 days, and then the first review results are released in a month, with online acceptance within 14 days

(0) 讚！ | 雾都子楠

Review speed: 2.0 | Acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The difficulty level is high, reviewers have strict requirements, but the content is very academic

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁