If possible, please try to supplement the experiment. If it is really not possible, then carefully consider reasons for defense, but a humble and cautious tone is essential. After all, even major revisions have a certain rejection rate

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When responding to the comments of the reviewers, all questions must be answered one by one without any omissions; try to meet the demand for additional experiments as suggested in the comments, and if it cannot be met, provide a reasonable explanation as to why it cannot be done; citations recommended by the reviewers must be used and discussed thoroughly; when submitting a revised manuscript, make sure to check the areas corrected in the initial draft.
If you agree with the modifications suggested by the editor, simply accept the changes. If you disagree, write down your reasons below the comments and provide feedback to the editor. In case of disagreement, negotiations can be conducted

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the difference between responding to reviewer's comments and responding to editor's comments?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

The reviewer requested me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples have run out. The experiment has already ended. Will my paper be rejected if I just state that my samples are used up?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

As long as we can maintain the SCI journals, it will be fine. If the school starts calculating based on CiteScore in the future, we wouldn't have to worry. On one hand, CiteScore includes a wider range of journals, so this journal will definitely be included; on the other hand, it benefits smaller journals. The difference is not that significant for everyone. I hope the school adopts CiteScore

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Focus of research: Metabolism

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁