First review: Three months of major revisions, both reviewers were very thorough.
Second review: One month, one reviewer recommended acceptance, while the other asked a few questions and indicated no need for additional review. Minor revisions were requested.
Third review: Half a month, the editor requested changes to a few details.
Overall, the journal editor was very thorough, and the quality was sufficient, but unfortunately it is in the third tier.
Is it common for this journal to add reviewers during the review process?

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

Established journals, trusted by the older generation, I hope the impact factor can increase. In this fast-paced era, the number of articles is still less than 100

(0) 讚！ | 清风眩

accepted
02 Aug 2023
under peer review
24 Jul 2023
passed technical check
24 Jul 2023
Amendme24 Jul 2023
Revision received
23 Jul 2023
under peer review
21 Apr 2023
passed technical check
21 Apr 2023
Revision received
20 Apr 2023
under peer review
29 Mar 2023
Technical check
status 	Date
passed technical check
29 Mar 2023
under technical check
29 Mar 2023
Submission received

Translation:

accepted
02 Aug 2023
under peer review
24 Jul 2023
passed technical check
24 Jul 2023
Amendme24 Jul 2023
Revision received
23 Jul 2023
under peer review
21 Apr 2023
passed technical check
21 Apr 2023
Revision received
20 Apr 2023
under peer review
29 Mar 2023
Technical check
status 	Date
passed technical check
29 Mar 2023
under technical check
29 Mar 2023
Submission received

(0) 讚！ | LooooI

The two reviewers in the first review agreed to publish, but in the second review, an additional reviewer rejected it, leading to the rejection.

(0) 讚！ | Wangxinyi

Recebidos os relatórios do revisor / Pronto para a decisão do editor.

(0) 讚！ | Wangxinyi

1 Reviewer report received

(0) 讚！ | Wangxinyi

Exactly one month, now 2 Reviewer(s) invited.

(0) 讚！ | Wangxinyi

How long does it usually take to know the results after the revision has been edited?

(0) 讚！ | Wangxinyi

Old-established journals with high language requirements have great influence.

(1) 讚！ | 腹黑的小鸟

It was 7 months later that result was given in the first review, and it’s really super slow. I don’t know what the hell the editors were doing. By now it has been almost a year since I submitted the manuscript, and no results were given. The reminder letters were sent countless times and all the replies were just to wait.

(3) 讚！ | 一条小翘嘴

The questions asked by the experts are very demanding. The first author has published 15 SCI articles. It was the most difficult this time. There were not many comments, but they are difficult to address.

(3) 讚！ | 没背景的科研迷

If I could revise faster, the review time could be shortened by about a month. The manuscript is sent for external review after two months of submission. External review last for two months, we revised the manuscript for two months, and it was accepted in two months after returning the revision.

(0) 讚！ | CKONE

innovation is not high rejected

(0) 讚！ | 1393084381@qq.com

This is an old journal of soil science and plant nutrition; a favorite of the older generation of soil scientists. The impact factor of this journal is not high, and the innovation requirements of the article are not high. However, the credibility and guiding significance of the article data must be very strong.

(1) 讚！ | 大侠

is fast and suitable for students who need to publish articles in a short time.Submitted in June, published online September 30th.

(0) 讚！ | N

The journal was reviewed quickly, submitted in April, and returned in July.On August 15th, online publication

(0) 讚！ | 匿名