X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH

期刊標題檢索 NUCLEIC ACIDS R 最新評論: Submission on October 12, 2024 Under review in the first round on O... (2024-11-21)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH]您好,您是該頁面的第 343402 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
LetPub Score
9.1
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
9.2

Influence
9.1

Speed
9.3

期刊簡稱NUCLEIC ACIDS RES
ISSN0305-1048
E-ISSN1362-4962
h-index452
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
27.107.0483.839
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Genetics
Q16 / 347

自引率 (2023-2024)4.20%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) publishes the results of leading edge research into physical, chemical, biochemical and biological aspects of nucleic acids and proteins involved in nucleic acid metabolism and/or interactions. It enables the rapid publication of papers under the following categories: Chemistry and synthetic biology; Computational biology; Gene regulation, chromatin and epigenetics; Genome integrity, repair and replication; Genomics; Molecular biology; Nucleic acid enzymes; RNA and Structural biology. A Survey and Summary section provides a format for brief reviews. The first issue of each year is devoted to biological databases, and an issue in July is devoted to papers describing web-based software resources of value to the biological community.

NAR Methods Online provides a forum for the online publication of methods papers.
官方網站https://academic.oup.com/nar
在線稿件提交http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nar
開放訪問Yes
出版商Oxford University Press
主題領域生物
出版國/地區ENGLAND
發行頻率月2回刊行
創刊年0
每年文章數1208每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比93.75%
OA Related Info
APC: Yes( USD3802; )
APC waiver:Check Notes
Other charges: No
Keywords: dna、biochemistry、computational biology、genomics、molecular biology、rna
Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q1

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGYSCIEQ16/313
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0305-1048%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s)
競爭力 *來自作者的數據: About 43.75%
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    NATURE MEDICINEH-index: 497

    CiteScore: 100.90
    CELLH-index: 705

    CiteScore: 110.00
    Molecular CancerH-index: 103

    CiteScore: 54.90
    Molecular PlantH-index: 85

    CiteScore: 37.60
    Molecular CellH-index: 356

    CiteScore: 26.00
    PROGRESS IN LIPID RESEARCHH-index: 132

    CiteScore: 24.50
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGYH-index: 172

    CiteScore: 25.30
    CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATIONH-index: 193

    CiteScore: 24.70
    Nature Chemical BiologyH-index: 182

    CiteScore: 23.90
    TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINEH-index: 160

    CiteScore: 24.60
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules1343644
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS575926
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY396225
    CELL298624
    FASEB JOURNAL271605
    International Journal of Biological Sciences242018
    Molecular Cancer231090
    PLANT SCIENCE228344
    ONCOGENE204323
    ACS Chemical Biology196626
  •  

    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/9)
  [NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: Kevin1990


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-11-21 16:16:13 評論於
Submission on October 12, 2024
Under review in the first round on October 26, 2024
(0) 讚! | Kevin1990

作者: 蓝魂之恋


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-11-19 15:20:45 評論於
Now some primary schools in the country (some first-tier and second-tier) only consider the district rankings, which can be classified as secondary publications based on the level of NC... After NAR was classified as second-tier, it is not as good as those first-tier journals.
(0) 讚! | 蓝魂之恋

作者: 蓝魂之恋


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-10-31 16:16:53 評論於
You said that the database is corrupt, but domestic MP, imeta, and SB don't do things so blatantly. To put it bluntly, this magazine publisher has less influence, so it doesn't have as much vested interest in domestic affairs.
(0) 讚! | 蓝魂之恋

作者: MMMMMeng啊


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-27 22:20:18 評論於
I can't understand why NAR, such a classic journal, has been listed as a double second-zone journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences for nearly three years, while many domestic journals can easily be listed as first-zone journals.
(0) 讚! | MMMMMeng啊

作者: 暴风寒天


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-08 14:38:43 評論於
Please select.
(0) 讚! | 暴风寒天

作者: 思文


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-15 12:17:34 評論於
Domestic partition drives people crazy. Everyone is spinning around the baton, spinning their hats. No one is seriously engaging in scientific research
(0) 讚! | 思文

作者: 思文


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-15 12:16:20 評論於
elife is also good, I have published an article there. Its positioning should be on par with PC and NAR, but the culture within the community is quite serious
(0) 讚! | 思文

作者: 思文


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-15 11:15:21 評論於
NAR and PLANT Cell are currently considered to be the top two journals in many foreign botanical laboratories. NAR is a classic old journal with a good reputation, influence, and rigor. It also has a high impact factor. Cell reports is far behind. I don't understand why NAR was ranked in the second quartile
(0) 讚! | 思文

作者: 狮子座


領域: 农林科学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-05-11 08:01:29 評論於
Sharing Three Submission Experiences. We work on plants.
The first article was rejected by Plant Cell, rejected after review by NAR, rejected by NCB with a referral to a smaller NC, and finally published in NC.
The second article was rejected after review by Plant Cell, we submitted directly to NCB and successfully referred to a smaller NC, and finally published smoothly.
The third article followed the same routine, first Plant Cell, then NAR and then referred to a smaller NC, finally published successfully.

Seeing the promotion of journal recognition makes me speechless. Professional journals and these so-called comprehensive journals have different considerations. PC and NAR look at the driving force for the discipline, while PNAS, SA, NC, etc. look at whether they can generate discussion. Those in research look at professional journals, while those in business look at comprehensive journals. Each to their own needs
(2) 讚! | 狮子座

作者: 狮子座


領域: 农林科学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-05-11 07:46:17 評論於
@ Donghai Pingya, is the acceptance rate lower than cell reports? Are you serious? What is the acceptance rate of cell reports? Generally, we only consider cell reports after our NAR PC rejection. I can't be bothered to argue with you about the acceptance rate of NAR compared to PNAS, as the former is a professional journal while the latter caters more to the general public. If you want to say it's even worse than cell reports, that's really pushing it. Most of the articles in Cell reports, NC, and SA are just fluff, whereas which article in NAR, aside from special issues, is just fluff?
(0) 讚! | 狮子座

作者: Crystal231


領域: 化学
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-10 09:59:17 評論於
I am a domestic student and I have published a research article. Still not sure if I will graduate
(0) 讚! | Crystal231

作者: 红的黄的蓝的绿的青的紫的雾


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-08 09:43:29 評論於
The submission process is as follows: submit in September 2023, receive reviewer comments in about a month with around 70 issues, and given half a year for revisions; receive another round of reviewer comments before the Chinese New Year in February 2024 after a month. Receive second round of comments in early March 2023, with not many comments but still given half a year for revisions. Return in early April 2023 and directly accepted without external review. Our research is relatively niche, but highly innovative, and we are quite confident in this study. We have submitted to countless journals, including domestic ones, and have been rejected. We also submitted to journals with lower impact factors than NAR like EMBO J, PNAS, and were rejected as well. NAR editors are very professional, and I feel that my research aligns well with their direction, so I am happy to be recognized. Finally, although it is not ideal to publish in NAR, I am still very satisfied
(0) 讚! | 红的黄的蓝的绿的青的紫的雾

作者: 天神院若曦


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-05-07 20:10:34 評論於
This section is really killer, funny enough the recognition at school is not even as good as Cell Reports
(0) 讚! | 天神院若曦

作者: ^只是朱颜改^


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-04-23 09:01:16 評論於
There is no way, this magazine has a lot of articles on database and web server
(0) 讚! | ^只是朱颜改^

作者: 康斯坦茨


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-04-19 09:42:14 評論於
I just got a tenure-track AP position at a state university ranking 40-50 in the US, with just two publications in NAR last year. Many others with subpublications didn't even get an interview. And I got placed in the second round, this is
(1) 讚! | 康斯坦茨

作者: 燃木谷玉


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-04-11 17:55:27 評論於
The Chinese Academy of Sciences is a joke
(0) 讚! | 燃木谷玉

作者: 种玉米的土豆


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-03-28 09:25:42 評論於
High influence, good reputation. And the threshold is also very high. Chinese people mostly publish articles on resources or tools. There are very few research papers published by Chinese people, because nucleic acid testing still requires technical expertise. Not everyone can do it.

Saying that NAR research paper has low citation is truly not understanding academia. Articles that anyone can understand will naturally have high citation. NAR's articles have a high threshold; you probably can't understand them or don't have the patience to read them, so of course the citation is low. This is almost negatively correlated with the level of the journal and the level of the article
(0) 讚! | 种玉米的土豆

作者: 磕盐的修勾


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-11 20:52:32 評論於
2024年3月10日修订
(0) 讚! | 磕盐的修勾

作者: hdjhfjd


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-06 01:37:20 評論於
How many reviewers does this journal have? Thank you
(0) 讚! | hdjhfjd

作者: hdjhfjd


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-05 00:27:22 評論於
How many reviewers does this journal have? Thank you
(0) 讚! | hdjhfjd

作者: 磕盐的修勾


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-04 21:42:52 評論於
I didn't upload the sequencing results
(0) 讚! | 磕盐的修勾

作者: hdjhfjd


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-02 05:02:10 評論於
Do I need to upload the raw sequencing data when submitting this journal for the first time?
(0) 讚! | hdjhfjd

作者: 无冬小晨


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-02-27 23:33:44 評論於
Has your submission been reviewed?
(0) 讚! | 无冬小晨

作者: 无冬小晨


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-02-27 22:02:07 評論於
My editorial email reply has already been sent to find reviewers, but the status is still "editorial review." What's going on?
(0) 讚! | 无冬小晨

作者: 无冬小晨


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-02-27 18:12:28 評論於
It has been a week since I submitted my manuscript, but it still shows "in editorial review". However, it has already been sent for review. Why has the status not changed?
(0) 讚! | 无冬小晨

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/9)

開始撰寫 [NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*