The review process is indeed very rigorous. One reviewer raised 30 questions, while the other raised 15, for a total of 45 questions. We have answered all of them

(0) 讚！ | @闪闪1

The review is very strict:
R1 major revisions by one reviewer, minor revisions by another reviewer;
R2 one acceptance, one reviewer has one additional comment;
R3 the editor provides two comments.
Both reviewers and editor are very professional, the quality of the paper has significantly improved, thanks to NED

(0) 讚！ | 农夫三拳1

Reviewers and editors carefully reviewed the manuscript, made professional suggestions, and significantly improved the quality of the article. It is hoped that the community will continue to improve with the return of District 2 this year

(0) 讚！ | chenliwei

It's been three months since the external audit, and there has been no news

(0) 讚！ | 渡鸦

Already in the middle

(0) 讚！ | 无怨

Sep 27, 2023 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | 无怨

9.15 Uploaded 
9.16 Under review 
Two reviewers have accepted the review

(0) 讚！ | 无怨

8.31 upload for rework
9.2 Major overhaul. The editor raised 7 issues

(0) 讚！ | 无怨

2023.07.17 uploaded
2023.07.24 under review
2023.08.08 major
Requesting journal formatting template
Contact at 1264964088@qq.com

(0) 讚！ | 无怨

Can articles about fire protection and fire accidents be submitted?

(0) 讚！ | 淙

The first paper I wrote was the safety and risk analysis section that I submitted. Because it was my first time, I basically checked the status every day during the waiting process and recorded it for reference for future friends. The external review took three months, and after the external review comments came out, I anxiously waited for more than twenty days before receiving the reply for revisions. After making the revisions, I submitted them, and the next day I was accepted at lightning speed and published online in the same month. Although the external review was really long (mainly because I was eagerly anticipating it every day), the efficiency from revision to publication was really high. You can refer to my timeline. I was really hoping to see such a detailed content at first, so I am providing this information for everyone. Hehe. There is no need to be too anxious while waiting. I hope this is helpful!

Initial date submitted: Apr 29
Under Review: May 03
Under Review: Jun 02
Under Review: Jun 09
Under Review: Jun 20
Under Review: Jul 06
Required Reviews Completed: Jul 08
Decision in Process: Jul 12
Revised: Aug 1
Decision in Process: Aug 6
Accepted: Aug 8
Available online: Aug

(11) 讚！ | 沙漠汉堡包

Posted on October 11, 2021, it is still with the editor until now, a bit slow.

(1) 讚！ | sci小伙

I published 4 papers in this Journal. It is excellent in structural integrity and thermal-hydraulic topics. The reviewers comments are usually very detailed which enhance the quality of the manuscript. The 1st round review around 3~4 months and decision for the revision submission from the Editor takes at most 1 month. In case of the 2nd review, it takes a shorter period than the 1st round which about 2 months. Overall, I think it is one of the top Journals of nuclear engineering.

(0) 讚！ | b.g.almomani@gmail.com

The direction of structural health monitoring I worked on was submitted for three and a half months, and then received minor revisions. It was accepted ten days after the revisions, which is quite efficient.

(1) 讚！ | Arry12138

So slow, from sending to receiving, it took over a year, wasted too much time.

(4) 讚！ | wc9963

Well, it took half a year for the first review in 2018. And then, I was told that it was rejected. Judging from the rejection reasons given by the two reviewers, I feel that they didn’t read it carefully, or their research direction is completely different from mine. And the rejection reasons are also not what paper focuses on. I will not submit to this journal again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | Super_H

4 articles were accepted, and the review turnaround time ranged from 1 month to 3 months. Thanks to this journal, it allowed me to get a grant from Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth, a Natural Science Foundation from a province in China, and a Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars. However, with the gradually high demanding for the level of the journals to publish the work, a journal in Q4 has gradually been far from meeting the requirements... But I always remember NED, when I no longer need papers to support my basic needs, I will submit my latest article to NED again… Hope it will rank to Q3 soon...

(23) 讚！ | 少年一阵风

This journal is very slow in my opinion.

(0) 讚！ | thumyc

would like to ask which editor to process this journal is faster, thank you

(0) 讚！ | pangruipangpan@163.com

4 months, even the first trial did not come back, other journals received more than this late select, and even read the journal.This is the slowest journal I have ever encountered!!!!!

(0) 讚！ | universe.ren@163.com

It is easier to get

(0) 讚！ | David

Shentou

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Why do I submit the manuscript for 5 months without a message

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

select for the second article of this journal.Still fast.Minor repair after 6 months of submission, 10 days after submitting the revised manuscript, it is still fast

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I have no trial, in the middle!It’s a long time, and it’s only ten months before and after!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名