I feel like NJP doesn't have much influence. What do you think?

(0) 讚！ | 佐治

2023.08.04 submitted
2023.08.11 awaiting referee reports
2023.09.13 major revision
2023.10.31 submitted
2023.11.13 provisionally accepted
2023.11.14 formal accepted

(0) 讚！ | 天边残梦

Where can I find the status of a certain unknown elementary student? It seems like NJP is not the correct status

(0) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

1
Stage 1, Editorial Assessment, completed
2
Stage 2, Review, in progress
Sub-stage 2.1, Out to reviewers, completed
Hooray! We’re searching for expert referees to review your paper, and we’ll be back in touch with you when their reports are in.
Sub-stage 2.3, All reviewer reports received
3
Stage 3, Revision
4
Stage 4, Acceptance
5
Stage 5, Production
6
Stage 6, Published

(0) 讚！ | 某不知名小学生

Just saw someone mention that this website can show detailed status. It is recommended that the OP take a look at it https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/your-article/

(0) 讚！ | 某不知名小学生

Pretty fast. Submitted in mid-June, received minor revisions from two reviewers in mid-July, pre-accepted in early August, officially accepted in mid-August. Processing speed is very fast

(0) 讚！ | daiside

2023.01.29 submitted
2023.02.09 awaiting referee reports
2023.06.12 Major Revision
2023.07.02 submitted
2023.07.05 awaiting referee reports
2023.07.17 provisionally accepted
2023.07.18 formally accepted

I highly praise the reviewers of this journal. Their comments are all very professional, and one reviewer even provided feedback down to the page and line number, pointing out specific issues.

(0) 讚！ | 天边残梦

Normally, it takes over two months for the review process. This journal is just very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 漫天星辰花

It is a very good journal. Our senior colleagues have submitted articles to it before, and the reviewers are very professional. The review process of this journal is still very strict, not very easy.

(0) 讚！ | 漫天星辰花

2023.01.29 submit
2023.02.09 awaiting referee reports

(0) 讚！ | 天边残梦

Just invested today, hoping to win.

(0) 讚！ | 天边残梦

If you have waited too long, you can send a reminder letter to urge them. It is very likely that the editor has forgotten.

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

It has been almost two months since I submitted, but there has been no news. I don't know why.

(19) 讚！ | DK不吃榴莲

I am also appealing. There are two reviewers, one agrees and one disagrees, but the editor rejected it directly. I have already appealed, and the editor is still finding new reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 木木不是木头啦

So, when you submitted your contribution, did it get rejected by the system? And then did you appeal?

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

The overall process, from the speed of review to publication, feels quite fast. Two reviewers provided suggestions, which were not overly strict, and the paper was accepted right after responding. However, the page charges are not cheap, so it is still recommended to submit.

(0) 讚！ | Geng0912

May I ask, after a submission, if it shows "awaiting decision" for two to three days, and then changes to "Awaiting Referee Reports" for another two to three days, does it mean that it has been sent for external review or that the editorial department has directly rejected the submission?

(0) 讚！ | honestly

The editor is very professional. One of the three reviewers has been entangled in a seemingly important but irrelevant issue. The other two have agreed to publish the article after two rounds of review. We directly sent an email to the editor-in-chief to appeal, and the next day it was accepted. This journal favors work with solid theoretical foundations. It has a good reputation in Europe. At the same time, when familiar professors in the department were chatting, they mentioned that the rejection process for high-quality papers is more complicated and requires at least two editors to deliberate. If a paper is rejected after their deliberation, it indicates that the editorial department is hesitant...

(1) 讚！ | 小齐的七

What the person upstairs said is all correct. If this magazine is rejected by the editorial department, it will quickly appear in the "awaiting decision" status after submission. However, it takes a few days before they send you an email rejecting it without review (this is also a very strange thing!).

(4) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

I feel like checking this is useless!!!

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

It feels useless to check this.

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

Does anyone know if "awaiting decision" means rejection after submission? Why don't they reject immediately, but instead drag it out for a few days?????????

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

May I ask how long it takes to review?

(1) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

Initial review by three reviewers, two of whom agreed to publish after minor revisions, while the other reviewer seemed to have rejected the paper without even reading it, using only jargon that made no sense. Therefore, we promptly appealed, and the editor quickly found new reviewers. The new reviewers also recommended publishing after minor revisions, which were submitted two weeks later. The paper was accepted over 20 days later. Personally, I feel that NJP's handling speed is very fast, and the editor and staff of the editorial department are very professional and responsible. I have published multiple times in NJP, and I am sharing this experience for everyone's reference. I also recommend submitting suitable manuscripts to NJP, as NJP is worthy of your trust.

(231) 讚！ | Dynamics

I would like to ask, since PRA and NJP are different publishers, how would you suggest switching submissions?

(0) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘