X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

NEUROSCIENCE

期刊標題檢索 NEUROSCIENCE 最新評論: Can I ask everyone, is inviting reviewers very slow? It has been seve... (2024-09-23)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[NEUROSCIENCE]您好,您是該頁面的第 189961 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱NEUROSCIENCE NEUROSCIENCE
LetPub Score
6.8
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
7.6

Influence
5.9

Speed
8.8

期刊簡稱NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN0306-4522
E-ISSN1873-7544
h-index204
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.200.9030.765
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Neuroscience
Subcategory: General Neuroscience
Q241 / 113

自引率 (2023-2024)0.00%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
官方網站http://www.journals.elsevier.com/neuroscience/#description
在線稿件提交https://www.editorialmanager.com/NSC
開放訪問No
出版商Elsevier Ltd
主題領域医学
出版國/地區ENGLAND
發行頻率月2回刊行
創刊年1976
每年文章數361每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比24.21%
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q2

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
NEUROSCIENCESSCIEQ2143/310
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0306-4522%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: About 1.0 month(s)
競爭力 *來自作者的數據: About 50%
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【NEUROSCIENCE】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCEH-index: 357

    CiteScore: 35.00
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCEH-index: 375

    CiteScore: 38.60
    Molecular NeurodegenerationH-index: 66

    CiteScore: 23.00
    NeuronH-index: 430

    CiteScore: 24.50
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCESH-index: 269

    CiteScore: 26.50
    Annual Review of NeuroscienceH-index: 224

    CiteScore: 25.30
    Journal of NeuroinflammationH-index: 92

    CiteScore: 15.90
    PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGYH-index: 212

    CiteScore: 12.80
    NeurotherapeuticsH-index: 100

    CiteScore: 11.00
    GLIAH-index: 148

    CiteScore: 13.10
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    Journal of Neuroinflammation196861
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE185806
    BRAIN RESEARCH140176
    MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY129335
    Neuron121663
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS115229
    CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics110055
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE98385
    CEREBRAL CORTEX98065
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY94482
  •  

    NEUROSCIENCE NEUROSCIENCE
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/8)
  [NEUROSCIENCE] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: Cui


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-23 09:01:50 評論於
Can I ask everyone, is inviting reviewers very slow? It has been several days and we still haven't received any feedback from the reviewers. How many days does it usually take for everyone?
(0) 讚! | Cui

作者: Cui


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-17 18:51:24 評論於
Just submitted my paper, went through technical review, then with editor, now it's under review. Is there any place to see more detailed results? Which stage are we at now?
(0) 讚! | Cui

作者: 睿达小公主


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-08 16:29:53 評論於
Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: experience sharing on cerebrovascular diseases
Comments: A well-established journal, currently rated 2.9, falls in the fourth category of its field. Is it still considered a third-tier journal? Will it be downgraded?
(0) 讚! | 睿达小公主

作者: 辉夜玄穆


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-07-02 17:36:38 評論於
You can check if the editorial team of the journal has experts in the relevant field, or find experts who have published similar peer-reviewed articles in databases, or even reach out to the big names cited in the reference articles.
(0) 讚! | 辉夜玄穆

作者: 普鲁登斯齐默尔曼


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-30 17:42:50 評論於
When submitting manuscripts, do you let yourself choose the editor? Does anyone have any experience or recommendations?
(0) 讚! | 普鲁登斯齐默尔曼

作者: 阿h


領域: 工程技术
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-21 09:51:03 評論於
Sorry, the person above me, I replied to the wrong journal.
(0) 讚! | 阿h

作者: 阿h


領域: 工程技术
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-21 09:49:35 評論於
When submitting a manuscript, how do I choose single-blind review, as it seems to default to double-blind review?
(0) 讚! | 阿h

作者: ly879752577


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-06-21 09:43:22 評論於
The accepted manuscript was quickly proofread, and different versions will be published in PubMed as the journal progresses, until the printing. After printing, it still cannot be retrieved in the core journals of WOS. This year, the JCR zone has been upgraded, but the impact factor has decreased.
(0) 讚! | ly879752577

作者: wfZDX


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-13 10:24:28 評論於
I submitted a meta-analysis to this journal, and one reviewer has reviewed it. However, I have not been able to find another reviewer yet. I wonder, how many reviewers are usually needed for a meta-analysis in this journal?
(0) 讚! | wfZDX

作者: 来楠楠


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-06-07 21:02:07 評論於
Can I ask the host if the proofreading notice has been sent out? We have accepted the April issue but have not received any proofreading notice
(0) 讚! | 来楠楠

作者: 来楠楠


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-06-07 21:01:25 評論於
I would like to ask the host, have you notified the submission deadline? I have been admitted for over two months and have not been notified about revising the manuscript
(0) 讚! | 来楠楠

作者: 来楠楠


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-06-07 21:00:35 評論於
I want to ask, how long does it take to receive the proofreading after being hired? I have been hired for two months without any notification for proofreading
(0) 讚! | 来楠楠

作者: 青鑫


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-22 16:53:36 評論於
The journal is very responsible, but the review process is quite long. After a major revision, the paper will be accepted directly
(0) 讚! | 青鑫

作者: ly879752577


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-05-12 18:39:09 評論於
The speed of journal external review is acceptable, with results given in 1.5 months. The first revision fee is processed in 25 days, but each process is slightly slow. It generally takes 3-5 days for the editorial team to process submissions or revisions. Review comments are detailed and mainly focused on meeting the journal's format requirements. After adding experiments and making two revisions, the second revision focused on formatting changes. The editor made a decision directly after the second revision, overall experience was satisfactory. Although full films were requested, only pieced together full films were provided, and some were not fully pieced together, the editor did not criticize
(0) 讚! | ly879752577

作者: 极乐晟华


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-05-12 11:33:54 評論於
After submission, the request for resubmission of the Ethical Statement indicates whether the information from the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee needs to be included. Or should additional information such as author consent and data availability be added?
(0) 讚! | 极乐晟华

作者: sjyelva


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2023-12-03 18:02:13 評論於
The review process is very slow, taking over 2 months each time, and the most outrageous part is that after going through major and minor revisions for half a year, the paper was ultimately rejected. I don't understand their thought process. If they think my paper is not suitable, why bother with minor revisions?
(2) 讚! | sjyelva

作者: may_lsj


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-07-18 21:20:42 評論於
What is the reason for the rejection? How many reviewers? Did all the reviewers reject it?
(0) 讚! | may_lsj

作者: 小斷


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 10.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2023-07-18 12:06:31 評論於
After 10 months of review, they finally rejected it. Everyone is furious.
(0) 讚! | 小斷

作者: wangrfv56


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-06-22 12:32:03 評論於
The comments on the manuscript are pertinent. We accept the revisions, but the impact factor is relatively low.
(0) 讚! | wangrfv56

作者: anianson


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-04-06 04:44:24 評論於
22.7.3 Submission
22.9.30 Received first review message
22.11.28 Finished revising and submitted revised manuscript
23.1.7 Received second review message
23.3.8 Finished revising and submitted revised manuscript
23.4.3 Reviewer's review process completed
23.4.4 The editorial department sent a message notifying acceptance! Entering proofreading!
Very grateful. Thank you to the meticulous editorial department, the patient editor-in-chief, and the diligent reviewers. You have really helped me a lot! My fondness for neuroscience has increased!
(76) 讚! | anianson

作者: 排云绣梓


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-01-18 09:54:36 評論於
Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Have you ever experienced rejection and re-submission? Was it a rejection or something else?
(0) 讚! | 排云绣梓

作者: pppqy


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-11-30 17:07:57 評論於
Okay, thank you~ Wishing you success.
(0) 讚! | pppqy

作者: 页子大人


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2022-11-22 19:32:05 評論於
I submitted in September and got rejected in October. No response probably means that it is still under review. This magazine's reviewing process feels very meticulous. I wish you good results.
(0) 讚! | 页子大人

作者: pppqy


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-11-01 21:39:37 評論於
Hello, may I know when did you submit your application? It has been two months for me and I haven't received any updates. 555.
(0) 讚! | pppqy

作者: 页子大人


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2022-10-28 15:03:42 評論於
Approximately thirty to forty days are given to provide results. No email will be sent, so you need to follow the official website yourself. The first reviewer directly stated that there is no innovation and it is not helpful for clinical treatment. The second reviewer's opinion is more objective, pointing out why they believe there is no innovation. However, they also suggest that I should add some experiment results that are similarly not innovative. It is confusing, and I am unsure how to proceed with the revisions.
(0) 讚! | 页子大人

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/8)

開始撰寫 [NEUROSCIENCE] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*