Submission speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 
Research focus: Neurodegenerative diseases 
Experience sharing: I'm here

(0) 讚！ | 奉天亦儿

Couldn't find any reviewers? Usually under review within three days

(0) 讚！ | 奉天亦儿

Garbage magazine, reviewed by three reviewers for two months, one rejection to let the author test the single cell, the introduction is inconsistent and feels like I know it well, and two minor revisions, the editor rejected it

(0) 讚！ | Lynn Joyce

Are you writing a review or an article?

(0) 讚！ | 岳家绮兰

It's been over a month and I'm still "with editor". Does anyone know what's going on? I've even sent emails asking for an update but haven't received a response

(0) 讚！ | 雷电靖梅

Is original data required to be uploaded when submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 易筋翠柏

You are so fast, I envy you

(0) 讚！ | 平原晏然

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Accuracy: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Neurobiology of Disease IF: 6.1 1st Quarter 2023/06/05 Submitted to Journal 2023/06/06 With Editor 2023/06/07 Under Review 2023/07/05 Major Revision 2023/07/22 Submitted to Journal; With Editor 2023/07/24 Under Review 2023/08/05 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 小小风吖

At the end of May, I submitted an article on small animal MRI. In mid-June, I received the reviewers' comments, which required major revisions for two months. Two reviewers provided more than ten suggestions, which were quite reasonable. After one month of revisions, I submitted the revised version. The second round of review took three weeks, and both reviewers did not have any further questions, directly accepting the article.

(1) 讚！ | eXtreMe001

Is there a layout fee? Is it optional?

(0) 讚！ | 忘记时间

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasis research direction: Neurodegenerative Disease
Experience sharing: I have contributed to society. I submitted it at the end of June, reviewed for more than two months, urged once in the middle, received major revisions at the beginning of September, gave two months of time, the questions were quite reasonable, two reviewers, seven or eight questions, a lot of experimental data needed to be supplemented, but they were not major issues. At the end of October, I submitted the revised version, thinking it would be quick, but the second review also took two months, and I urged once in the middle. At the end of December, two days before New Year's Eve, I received the acceptance message. Overall, the editor was quite patient, but the review was a bit slow. This may be related to the availability of the reviewers, or it may be related to factors such as the epidemic and Christmas. I hope everyone's hard work will have good results. Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 玄虚琛丽

The major revision was obtained after waiting for more than 2 months for the first review. The revision took 2 months, and there weren't many or complex issues raised by the two reviewers. It has now been almost two months since the revision was sent back, and there is still no news. I am anxious to find a job and graduate, feeling particularly stressed! The review process is too slow, especially the second review, I really didn't expect it to be this slow.

(0) 讚！ | 金桔柠萌

No need for submission fees

(0) 讚！ | 玄虚琛丽

Do you need a review fee?

(0) 讚！ | 雾都柯慧

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Success Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted at the end of May, received major revisions in early June, revised and resubmitted at the end of August, and accepted in early October. Overall, it feels like a highly efficient journal with fairly reasonable feedback. Best of luck to all authors~

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢晓凡

After submitting the manuscript, the revised opinion will be given after about 2 months. The revised time will be given for two months. Two reviewers will have a large amount of data. It is not easy to meet the reviewers’ expectations. I received their comments in the past 3 weeks. I submitted my revisions for review.

(0) 讚！ | 13368225

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: After submitting the article, it took almost 2 months to receive feedback for revisions. Two reviewers were assigned, with a significant amount of data required. It's not easy to satisfy the reviewers. After submitting for 3 weeks, I made many revisions. However, upon seeing the data in other published articles, I felt a bit unbalanced as mine was not as extensive. Regardless, I have no choice as I have already submitted

(0) 讚！ | Wright Bessemer

Passing the five-point mark is a cause for celebration, aiming for a higher score next year. Even more remarkable would be passing the six-point threshold

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review process is a bit slow. It's been almost two months already

(0) 讚！ | 魔都芸欣

reviewing a little slowWaited for two months.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

It's been a month since I submitted the article, and it's still with the editor... This is too slow

(0) 讚！ | Rachel Pulitzer

No wonder, it's been 3 days and it's still in submitted status. If it were another journal, the status would have changed multiple times already. Maybe I should send a follow-up

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The lousy magazine rejected my submission after three months. I was hoping this article would get published! What bad luck!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁