Rejected on 6.13, one reviewer mentioned lack of innovation

(0) 讚！ | 无情滴怪蜀黍

What is the situation of rrc after the first review? How long will this status continue?

(0) 讚！ | 0298

Sure, I submitted it to the system on the first day, and it was rejected by the editor on the second day

(0) 讚！ | 井晚打老虎2500245760

2024.1.7 under review
2024.4.14 under review

(0) 讚！ | 和易

A total of 5 reviewers were invited, one accepted the invitation to review, and the reviewer completed the review one month after accepting it, with no change in status. Then no new reviewers were invited, and no new reviewers accepted the review. Two months have passed since the submission (direction: quantitative analysis of defects

(0) 讚！ | 无情滴怪蜀黍

Submission on 15th December 2023
External review on 27th December 2023 with two reviewers
Minor revisions due by 28th January 2024
Minor revisions uploaded by 31st January 2024
Accepted on 16th February 2024

(0) 讚！ | 123-654

I also lowered my tone after recording

(0) 讚！ | SCI-N

Special Issue on Deep Learning for Defect Detection

(0) 讚！ | OrangeJuice3211

Submitted in April 23, the article may not match the type of article well, and no reviewer was found in the middle. I am working on defect detection, focusing on image segmentation methods. After nearly 5 months of review, feedback was given for revisions. After making the revisions, it was just accepted last night, taking a total of 9 months

(0) 讚！ | OrangeJuice3211

I'm even more miserable. I submitted my work on 11.15, 2022, after spending a year working on it. I finally made it through the revisions, but suddenly it got rejected

(0) 讚！ | Qianwc

I thought this was the top publication in this field, why is it still dropping, it's not top anymore

(0) 讚！ | yukifaye

JCR Materials Science 2nd Quartile

(0) 讚！ | SCI-N

2023.12.21 submitted to journal
2023.12.22 with Editor

(0) 讚！ | 和易

Updated on 2023.12.17, under review

(0) 讚！ | 那树

2023.12.17 under review time update

(0) 讚！ | 那树

2023.11.8 WIth Editor
2023.12.15 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 那树

Under Review

(0) 讚！ | try hard

The speed is moderate. It took 5 months to receive the first round of review results from two reviewers. The first reviewer provided clear and specific comments, which were actually considerations we had taken into account during our experimental design. The feedback was very professional

(0) 讚！ | Tim blank

No reply in November 23rd

(0) 讚！ | hasake

Hello, is there any update on the status now?

(0) 讚！ | try hard

How are things going now?

(0) 讚！ | 不会学术的渣渣

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, each with the headings "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | SCI-N

Yesterday evening accepted the editing, come to supplement the follow-up.
On July 10, the editor sent an email for minor revisions, the first reviewer praised our work without any issues, and the second reviewer raised some grammar issues.
On July 12, sent back for revisions.
On July 13, under review, found that only one reviewer invitation was sent, and the reviewer had not accepted the invitation all along. During this period, a reminder email was sent from the system to the editor.
On August 11, in the evening, the editor probably saw that the reviewers had not accepted the invitation for almost a month, and directly accepted it without waiting, as there were no major issues at that point.
Thank you to editor Antonello Tamburrino, the work efficiency is really high. Although it was delayed for a long time due to the reviewers, I still appreciate it

(0) 讚！ | HelloZhangS

6.25 The first reviewer has completed.
6.26 The second reviewer accepts the review.
7.10 The second reviewer has completed, and the system status changes to RRC.

(0) 讚！ | HelloZhangS

Hello, have you found a reviewer for the external review now?

(0) 讚！ | Qianwc