期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | NATURE METHODS LetPub Score 9.7
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 10.0 Influence 9.7 Speed 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | NAT METHODS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1548-7091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1548-7105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.nature.com/nmeth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://author-welcome.nature.com/guided-oa/41592 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Springer Nature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 生物 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 193每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 33.54% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1548-7091%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Extremely difficult | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[NATURE METHODS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: GlycoFrog 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-05 05:36:32 評論於 June 2023: Submitted for review. October 2023: Received reviews, one positive and one negative. Appeal successful. December 2023: Submitted for second review. March 2024: Received second review with five reviewers this time. Original reviewers split, new reviewers two positive and one negative. Editor decides to reject the manuscript. The chaotic and lengthy review process increased my understanding of peer review but also left me with PTSD(0) 讚! | GlycoFrog |
作者: nicholem 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-29 19:46:22 評論於 Quite fast(0) 讚! | nicholem |
作者: dandan80 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-28 14:38:35 評論於 Overall, the review process started quickly, but it feels like the wait time after acceptance is longer (possibly due to the Christmas and New Year holidays(1) 讚! | dandan80 |
作者: 深渊天路 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-06-01 17:16:12 評論於 24-05-2023 manuscript submitted 25-05-2023 manuscript received 26-05-2023 editor assigned 26-05-2023 manuscript under consideration(0) 讚! | 深渊天路 |
作者: 走过路过的我 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-04-06 15:43:00 評論於 What happened afterwards?(0) 讚! | 走过路过的我 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 23:35:19 評論於 It is generally believed that the title and keywords complement each other around the research topic(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 19:59:15 評論於 Keywords should be avoided in the title. Most journals have this recommendation(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 北国博达 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-27 15:43:30 評論於 The relationship between keywords and titles is crucial in determining the success of a piece of content. Keywords serve as a guide for search engines to properly index and rank content, while titles act as the first impression for users to determine if the content is relevant to their search. By accurately incorporating keywords into the title, content creators can increase visibility and attract the right audience(0) 讚! | 北国博达 |
作者: 上清雨真 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-26 10:46:40 評論於 Can the keywords be extracted from the title?(0) 讚! | 上清雨真 |
作者: q1025hb007 領域: 物理 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-11-25 08:37:06 評論於 An article got accepted in the group. We discussed it with the editor in a meeting for a long time before it was submitted. The manuscript was revised and resubmitted two months after submission, and two months after resubmission, a minor revision was made and it got accepted. The content published was about an optoelectronic system that had been built for five years. (6) 讚! | q1025hb007 |
作者: 极乐寻山 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2019-02-15 22:55:04 評論於 11-02-2019 manuscript submitted 13-02-2019 manuscript received 13-02-2019 editor assigned 14-02-2019 manuscript under consideration(0) 讚! | 极乐寻山 |
作者: 新得力 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2019-02-15 21:02:26 評論於 11-02-2019 manuscript submitted13-02-2019 manuscript received13-02-2019 editor assigned14-02-2019 manuscript under consideration(0) 讚! | 新得力 |
作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2017-07-16 13:33:59 評論於 Who can predict how many points there will be next year?(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁 |
作者: 凌霄友竹 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2016-08-17 22:55:56 評論於 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Seeking Submission Experience~~~~(0) 讚! | 凌霄友竹 |
作者: Anonymous 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2016-08-17 17:57:57 評論於 Please submit the manuscript experience~~~~(0) 讚! | Anonymous |
作者: 努力啊大听云 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2016-08-14 19:30:23 評論於 Submitted to Nature in February, reviewed within a week, rejected a month and a half later. The feedback was relatively constructive, emphasizing the innovative aspects that were positively noted. The paper was then transferred to Nature Methods, where the editor immediately recommended revising the manuscript based on the feedback from Nature. The revised manuscript was resubmitted in May and reviewed again by two experts from Nature. Further revisions were made in June, with fewer suggested changes. After quickly addressing the remaining comments, the manuscript was resubmitted in early July, reviewed again, and ultimately accepted in early August. However, there were still some issues raised by the reviewers that needed to be addressed, along with detailed formatting suggestions from the editor. After addressing each point, the final acceptance was granted within a week. Overall feeling: Despite rejection from the main journal, if the feedback is good, the editors at NM are very considerate. However, as others have mentioned, the time it takes for decisions can be long due to editor deliberations, typically taking about two weeks for an initial decision(0) 讚! | 努力啊大听云 |
作者: 京城奕声 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2015-07-15 12:36:53 評論於 Have Chinese people not gotten rich in recent years? This comment is from 2013. I hope those with experience, whether successful or not, can share some insights(0) 讚! | 京城奕声 |
作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-13 19:34:46 評論於 Feels pretty good. If the method is significantly innovative and has great application prospects, you can submit to this journal. Just had one accepted a year ago. Missed it by a little over a week, our article would have been published in Nature(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁 |
作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-12-05 14:13:28 評論於 After reading the introduction on the homepage, it seems that articles focusing on methodology are more likely to be accepted. I happen to have a recent original small technical invention in the field of pathology, so I plan to submit it for consideration(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁 |
作者: 仲夏恨荷 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-07-02 14:09:31 評論於 Basically all rejected! I also applied before and got a quick response! It feels very difficult! I hope those who have succeeded can share their experiences!(0) 讚! | 仲夏恨荷 |
作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-04-30 18:30:35 評論於 The initial review took two months. Despite all three referees giving positive feedback, the editor requested two additional revisions. The first round of revisions took a month and a half, while the second round took another half month. The entire process from submission to publication took six months in total(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2011-11-30 19:53:00 評論於 Focus on innovative methods. The editor will reject 80% of the manuscripts within 1~2 weeks. 20% will be sent to the external audit, and 8% of them will be accepted. In summary, the acceptance rate is less than 2%. Regarding my manuscript, the editor refused on the 13th day, but the reviewers are still polite. The main reason for refusal is that “technical innovation is not enough to attract widespread attention”. It’s an "unreachable" journal! (2) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 平原梓云 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2011-11-30 17:11:25 評論於 Focus on innovative approaches. The editor conducts an initial review within 1-2 weeks, rejecting 80% of the submissions. 20% are sent for external review, with an acceptance rate of 8%. Overall, the acceptance rate is less than 2%. My submission was rejected by the editor on the 13th day, but the comments were relatively polite. The main reason for rejection was "lack of technical innovation, unable to attract widespread attention." So far, it seems that no articles authored by Chinese authors with Chinese affiliations as the first unit have been accepted. This journal seems too "out of reach"!(0) 讚! | 平原梓云 |
作者: 云来秋巧 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2011-04-24 21:32:58 評論於 The editor's delay in reviewing the manuscript results in a high rejection rate(0) 讚! | 云来秋巧 |
作者: 云来秋巧 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2011-04-24 14:11:22 評論於 The review process takes a long time with editors and the rejection rate is high(0) 讚! | 云来秋巧 |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us