Submitted for 5 months, reviewed by 3 reviewers, one minor revision, two major revisions, all three experts affirmed the importance and innovation of the article, and all agreed that the article is suitable for publication in the Nature series sub-journal. Reviewers 2 and 3 raised two technical issues, leading to rejection by the editor. However, the editor mentioned that after significant revisions, the article could be resubmitted, and the resubmitted manuscript would be treated as a new submission. Will the original reviewers still be involved in the review process after resubmission?

(1) 讚！ | zf519

Is it easy to innovate in the field of engineering applications?

(0) 讚！ | undefined

Congratulations to the host for getting the major publication. I would like to ask the host about the first round of review. Why is there "manuscript under consideration" after contacting potential reviewers? What is this process? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | acel

Editor notified of rejection after 15 days; This time is somewhat long for me compared to other journals; It would be better to reject sooner

(0) 讚！ | dmsnabc

Why are there so few comments on this magazine? I'm thinking of looking for experiences of past authors who submitted and published in Nat Geosci. Look at Nat Commun, the comment section is so long that I can't finish reading it for an hour +_+!

(0) 讚！ | Hao吃Lan做的科研人

Already submitted, unknown outcome. need a little bit of luck to make it through the review process!!

(0) 讚！ | zhipingmail

Haha, these thirty days must be full of expectations!

(1) 讚！ | lqqqqqqrs

After 30 days of submission, please inform me if it has not been sent for review. Speed really matters!!

(3) 讚！ | WA_CURT

Third round of review
Manuscript accepted - October 11, 2022
Decision sent to author - October 11, 2022
Manuscript under consideration - October 8, 2022
Editor assigned - September 30, 2022
Manuscript submitted - September 30
Submission in process - September 30

(1) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

Second Round Review:
Resubmission received 30th September 22
Awaiting resubmission 21st September 22
Decision sent to author 21st September 22
Manuscript under consideration 12th September 22
All Reviewers Assigned 25th August 22
Manuscript under consideration 22nd August 22
Editor Assigned 22nd August 22
Manuscript submitted 21st August 22
Submission in process 21st August 22

(1) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

First round of review
Resubmission received	August 21, 2022
Decision sent to author	July 15, 2022
Manuscript under consideration	June 23, 2022
All Reviewers Assigned	May 12, 2022
Manuscript under consideration	May 6, 2022
Contacting Potential Reviewers	April 26, 2022
Manuscript under consideration	April 21, 2022
Editor Assigned	April 15, 2022
Manuscript submitted	April 13, 2022
Submission in process	April 12, 2022

(1) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

Big boss, congratulations.

(0) 讚！ | 广西郭富城

The first sub-issue of life, focusing on a small problem that has been worked on for a long time, was repeatedly revised and submitted to Nature Geoscience. It took three months for the initial review and major revisions, and one month to complete the modifications and upload. After 25 days of re-review, an email was received from the editorial department stating that they would be happy to publish the article, pending minor revisions. As an individual, the article does not have any prestigious names attached to it. I am very fortunate and grateful to Nature Geoscience for giving me this opportunity.

(123) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

Don't be discouraged, the fact that your research direction is geoscience (remote sensing) makes Nature Geoscience the dream of almost everyone in the field of earth sciences. With so many people around the world focusing on it, you can imagine how difficult it is to get published in this journal. There are only a few who can publish their work in the field of remote sensing, and even fewer in China. It's important to maintain a calm and positive mindset.

(0) 讚！ | 111%

Submitted for 2 months, it has been under consideration as a manuscript all along, without being sent for review, and ultimately rejected. Moreover, the reasons for rejection are very perfunctory, stating that the subject matter is not suitable for publication. I really don't understand why this journal is so irresponsible. It took 2 months, and now there are many other good journals where the paper could have been published within 2 months. Please consider the time sensitivity of research results carefully.

(22) 讚！ | 科研小白

May I ask how many days after each submission you will be notified to send it for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想的女博士

On the 21th day of “with editor”, the article was rejected. The speed is much slower than Nature Communications.

(0) 讚！ | LemonZ

This journal has few comments. Let me simply share (my submission experience). One article was published three years ago. It is relatively difficult. In fact, I submitted 6 times, but it was sent for external review for 3 times, and only this article was received. May you good luck.

(40) 讚！ | 蓝海一梦

Manuscript under considerationManuscript submittedSubmission in processThen rejected

(4) 讚！ | Anonymous

The 2011 ISI impact factor is 11.754

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

strive to do this one~~~~~~~呵呵

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/index.html

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

has recently been biased towards earthquake work, probably related to the earthquakes of recent years.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名