2024.7.21 Manuscript Received.

(0) 讚！ | Warkem

Does this journal require confirmation from each author's email?

(0) 讚！ | 温佳杰

Extremely slow, it's been half a year

(0) 讚！ | 民工

23-11-2 submitted
11-2 awaiting referee reports
11-16 awaiting decision
11-23 major revision
12-14 R1 submitted
12-16 awaiting referee reports
12-21 awaiting decision
12-22 minor revision
12-25 R2 submitted
12-28 awaiting decision
1-2 minor revision
1-3 R3 submitted
1-8 awaiting decision
1-16 accept
2-28 formal accept
3-1 online

(0) 讚！ | melody

The contact email left on the website nano@ioppublishing.org doesn't reply, and the editor's email cannot be found. Does anyone have it?

(0) 讚！ | Dania

I also requested the submission deadline to be extended, but there has been no reply. I feel that this journal has many aspects that have declined greatly

(0) 讚！ | Dania

How has your state changed, mine has also undergone a similar phenomenon

(0) 讚！ | sciscisci1986

Sorry, you have not been hired yet. This is mainly because students are eager to graduate

(0) 讚！ | sciscisci1986

Modified return on January 3, 2024, still manuscript received on January 24, don't know what's wrong with the journal, it's already in the 4th section, don't want to wait anymore, sent an email but no reply, do I need to send an email to inform them if I withdraw the submission? Anyone with experience in withdrawals, please share

(2) 讚！ | sciscisci1986

I want to ask my family, is it a good idea to simulate the visible light nanoband and hyper-surface direction? I feel like there are not many articles on pure simulation. Please help me. ? My teacher asked me to submit this

(1) 讚！ | Bobby

When I submitted my work, it was in Zone 3. I didn't expect to receive any feedback, but it was moved down to Zone 4. What's more, it was still slow. I didn't remember others experiencing such a delay when submitting their works

(0) 讚！ | Dania

It has been over two months since submission, and the status has changed between "Out to reviewers" and "1st reviewer agreed to report" twice. It is back to "Out to reviewers" these days. Does that mean they are looking for another reviewer again? Should I send a reminder or not? It's really frustrating

(0) 讚！ | Dania

The latest edition of 2023 has already entered the 4th review round, I have been waiting for nearly half a year

(0) 讚！ | 陈长圣杰

It's been 6 days, and it's still Manuscript Received. How long will it take to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | Dania

It has been about a week since the return for repairs, and there is no progress showing on the backend tracking. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 李叮当

I waited for four months for the first trial and one and a half months for the second trial, in total, it took me half a year. I'm so frustrated!

(0) 讚！ | wenpeng95

The first article in the doctoral stage did not expect to be so slow. I submitted it on April 5th, and the official website said the average review speed is 35 days. However, the first review was not completed until August 4th, and it required major revisions. Before this, I sent multiple reminders, but could not find reviewers, which is really hard to understand. The revised manuscript was returned on August 30th, and it was accepted on October 15th. The second review also took me a month and a half, during which I sent reminders as well. The same problem occurred - one of the original reviewers did not submit the report, and a new reviewer had to be found, causing further delay. In total, I sent seven or eight reminders before the article was finally accepted. The speed of this journal is now too slow, which is why it dropped from the second tier to the third tier. I will not submit to this journal again in the future. The whole process has been frustrating, especially as I was waiting for this article to begin my research

(0) 讚！ | wenpeng95

August 4, 2023 - Submitted
August 25, 2023 - Major revision
September 4, 2023 - Resubmitted
October 5, 2023 - Minor revision, one of the reviewers did not review it, had to find a third one
October 8, 2023 - Resubmitted
October 13, 2023 - Still with the reviewers, about to lose my mind waiting for this article to find a job

(0) 讚！ | liali1

Do you need to provide the source files?

(0) 讚！ | 时间123

Submitted on 7.11, revised on 7.31, accepted on 8.25

(2) 讚！ | FAN-

Submitted on 6.25, reviewed the next day
Major overhaul on 7.8
Return from major overhaul on 8.3
Received on 8.9

(7) 讚！ | hnj

I submitted on May 26th, and it's already July 21st, but it's still under review... I feel like the review process is taking forever.

(0) 讚！ | Mr.小越越

Excuse me, has the status been updated now?

(0) 讚！ | Medic-C

2.11 Submission;
Review after two weeks;
3.16 Revision (deadline is April 12th);
4.1 Revised;
4.12 Second revision (mainly because one reviewer misunderstood and raised an unimportant question during the first revision, deadline is April 18th);
4.17 Revised (I procrastinated);
4.21 Accepted.
Overall, it went smoothly. In general, there is no problem with submitting and receiving within two months. Actually, the long revision time was entirely due to my procrastination. I believe that as long as the content is comprehensive and the narrative is clear, this journal does not have high requirements for innovation. My article has some degree of innovation, but I was in a hurry to submit, so I followed the principle of not wanting to make modifications and submitted it to this journal. I'm very grateful that Nano accepted it. Cheering for NaNo, hoping to at least return to JCR1, please please.

(3) 讚！ | 哇，是黑黑呀

Excuse me, is there any result now? It has been a month since I submitted my major revision, and it has been in the "submitted" tracking status for a month but has not been delivered to the reviewer yet. I am a bit anxious but also afraid to send a reminder letter. Has anyone had a similar experience?

(3) 讚！ | wy...