Before, I had a paper accepted in a master's program, and at that time it was still in a small category. The operation of RSC was really a mess, except for the popular energy journals, all the other journals were not good, and ACS completely dominated.

(0) 讚！ | masssss

Nanoscale used to be very prestigious. I was still submitting papers to them in 2017, and also to Langmuir. But now, it has declined.

(0) 讚！ | 佩洛西骚老马子吃屎长大的

It just returned to its proper level.

(0) 讚！ | AG超会玩

I just submitted it, can't believe it.

(0) 讚！ | kjt

How are your results?

(0) 讚！ | zousifang

The self-proclaimed extraordinary journal has seen a continuous decline in its impact factor rankings. Articles of the same type previously accepted by this journal are now being rejected by editors with comments like "we do not accept this type of article anymore, were those previously published even human?" The journal is filled with articles from connections, many of which are of lower quality compared to some articles from lower-tier journals. The review process is exclusive and biased, and those in the know understand this.

(1) 讚！ | CQDs

27 days rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

What does it mean to neither accept nor reject without review?

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

Still with editor, what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

Which date are you hired?

(0) 讚！ | 不二周助

Is it over? It's been a week already

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

5.26 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

Submitted on 5.22, it is still under initial review. I wonder how long it will take to be with editor

(0) 讚！ | 中中中V

May 9th - May 23rd

(0) 讚！ | 其他人

How long did it take for your last decision? I got a reject without review first, then a minor revision, and finally a major revision. After resubmitting, the reject without review turned into a major revision, and then it came back with a minor revision. The final decision from the editor was "accept for publication after revision." Everything went smoothly during the process. The last response was on May 8th, and it went back and forth between "with editor" and "in peer review" until February 23rd

(0) 讚！ | 其他人

Should you appeal after being rejected?

(0) 讚！ | zjx樱桃

2023.12.15: submitted manuscripts
2023.12.15: checking submission and files
2023.12.15: initial assessment
2023.12.19: with editor
2023.12.21: In peer review
2024.01.17: with editor
2024.01.24: In peer review
2024.01.29: with editor
2024.02.06: In peer review
2024.02.12: with editor
2024.02.14: in peer review
2024.02.18: with editor
2024.02.21: reject

(0) 讚！ | Leon

I really witnessed the whole process of Nanoscale's rise and fall. During my 4 years of master's degree, I remember it was scoring over 8, just behind ACS Nano, Nano Letters, and Small. However, in the background of crazy increases in other journals and the emergence of new ones, Nanoscale continued to decline, now scoring just over 6. It has also been downgraded from a top-tier journal to a third-tier one, even worse than ACS Applied Nano. The number of publications is also decreasing. Oh... now it's only 5.5, and I think the Impact Factor in June will be below 6, while ACS Applied Nano now has a score of 5. Looking at next year's IF, both are only at 0.4

(21) 讚！ | +和+

2023.10.24 Submission
2024.01.14 Revision
2024.01.28 Resubmission
2024.01.28 Editing
2024.02.09 Second Review
2024.02.13 Acceptance

(31) 讚！ | 牧马大哥

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:" respectively: 20240209 Second review

(0) 讚！ | 牧马大哥

Why is it taking so long? It's been over a month and there's still no initial decision

(0) 讚！ | zjx樱桃

2023.10.24 Submission
2024.01.14 Revision
2024.01.28 Submission
2024.01.28 Editing - Present

It's really slow

(66) 讚！ | 牧马大哥

Bored AF

(0) 讚！ | 半π

Why did it drop to Zone 3? Can someone who knows explain it?

(0) 讚！ | 半π

It has been a month since I submitted the review, and it is still under external review. How long will it take to get the results? Is there a high chance of rejection in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | zjx樱桃