Clicked the wrong button, submission cycle is 10 months

(0) 讚！ | 吃饭不刷碗

The review process is very thorough, but the speed is too slow. It could be time to submit another article from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 吃饭不刷碗

Unbalanced research direction: Evolutionary experience sharing: I really can't believe it, this journal is too slow to find reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 破戒丝雨

Review speed: 6.0
Sharing experience: A very classic and professional journal. I submitted my paper in February 2018 before the Chinese New Year. In July 2018, I received major revisions. The comments from two anonymous reviewers were very helpful. I received the revised manuscript back in September 2018 (with a one-month extension due to business travel). On October 20th, I was notified that my paper had been accepted. The wait was very long, but I feel that the effort was worth it. I hope this information is helpful for other first-time authors

(0) 讚！ | 四风玉泽

Very classic and professional journals, officially submitted in the year of August 2012, and returned to the review for overhaul in 2018.7 months. The comments of the two anonymous reviewers have greatly helped the article.2018.9 returns at the end of the month (during the application for extension of the return to January, due to business trip), 2018.10 months 20 notice to receive the manuscript.Waiting is very long, but it feels worthwhile to work hard.I hope to be helpful to other first contributors.

(3) 讚！ | lazyliu

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted on September 18th, revised extensively two months later, revised again one month later, underwent another major revision two months later, and finally accepted officially seven days later. The review process was very professional, with high academic standards requiring theoretical explanation and justification

(0) 讚！ | 月河修文

Submitted on September 18th, overhauled after two months, repaired one month later, overhauled two months later, and officially acceptd after one and a half months.The review is very professional, the academic level is relatively high, and there must be a theoretical explanation and basis.

(0) 讚！ | xxianhua@sina.com.cn

Submitted on September 14, 2012, notified on September 21 that it did not pass the format review, resubmitted on September 24, and informed of rejection on January 30, 2013. After waiting for a full 4 months, I thought it would be a major revision. The revision suggestions of the two reviewers were very consistent and professional. Fortunately, the host is not in a hurry to graduate this year, otherwise it would be miserable

(0) 讚！ | Yves Morton

Submitted on September 14, 2012, the notice on September 21 failed to pass the format review, and was re-submited on September 24, and was rejected on January 30, 2013.Waiting for a full four months, I thought it would be a major overhaul.The reviewers' recommendations for the two reviewers are very consistent and professional.Xin Xin landlord is not in a hurry to graduate this year, or it will be miserable.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I have been waiting for the review for six and a half months and there is still no reply yet. I am not in a rush for the article, so you can give it a try

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's been 5 months since submission, and it's still under review

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is generally called MPE in China and has a certain authority in the field of systems and evolutionary biology. The first thing to note is that if your article needs to be published in time, there is no need to choose this journal. When you submit an article, you should look at the history of the journal. It is less than a year or so.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is generally called mpe in China, and it has a certain authority in the field of systematics and evolutionary biology! First of all, it should be noted that if your article needs to be published in a timely manner, it is not necessary to choose this journal. When submitting an article, you should take a look at the article history of this journal. Less than a year is too short, and some articles may take as long as 18 months from submission to acceptance. Please refer to http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1055790312000243 for details. received 25 august 2010. revised 23 november 2011. accepted 10 janua

(0) 讚！ | 小莉娟吖

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Slow review! Those who don't need the article urgently can submit

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The review process at MPE is very slow, generally taking over 3 months to receive the first review response, and 6-12 months to get accepted. My article took over a year to be accepted, the editing process is very slow, wasting time. It is prestigious in the field of evolution

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁