Submitted in mid-November of 24, the submission was assigned to an editor the next day, who contacted the author via email regarding the submission format issues. After returning, UR waited for two months; In mid-January of 25, received the reviewer's comments, less than twenty in total, and was given almost two months to revise; In early March of 25, the revisions were made, and a week later, they were accepted. The second round of revisions only involved some formatting issues. In late March of 25, proofreading was done, and one day later, it was sent ASAP.

(0) 讚！ | peanuttt

2024.12.5 submitted
2024.12.6 associate editor assigned
2024.12.10 revise & resubmit
Five comments from the editor, with one additional in vitro and in vivo experiment each
2025.2.5 revised
2025.2.6 back to the original editor
2025.2.11 in peer review
2025.3.1 reject
Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and one rejection. One of the reviewers fabricated a series of issues that did not exist in the manuscript, such as spelling errors, lack of scale, and incorrect figure labels. The other comments were fairly reasonable, but the editor mentioned they had too many submissions and decided to reject it. An appeal letter was sent, and the editor agreed to add an experimental group (meaning all experiments had to be redone) and address the reviewer comments before resubmission. Eventually, the decision was abandoned after three months of time-consuming efforts, and now facing the dilemma of delaying graduation. Oh, dear...

(0) 讚！ | 再睡一会儿

It took more than 3 months in total, with 4 rounds of revisions. The first round was in response to the reviewers, the second round addressed some of the suggestions made by the editors, although not completely understood. After the third round of revisions, the editors pointed out some minor issues with image clarity before publication. Overall, the editors were very attentive and responsible, and very kind. The reviewers were also very good, and I hope that MP will continue to improve in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 五星红旗迎风飘扬耶

October 19, 2024 (Saturday) 7:09 PM Submission
October 22, 2024 (Tuesday) 3:07 AM Reply format incorrect, need to be modified and resubmitted
October 22, 2024 (Tuesday) 3:07 AM Reminder again format incorrect, need to be modified and resubmitted
October 26, 2024 (Saturday) 9:03 PM Resubmit
December 3, 2024 (Tuesday) 11:33 PM Minor revisions (seven comments, six comments), 1 rejection (six comments)
December 17, 2024 (Tuesday) 10:31 PM Reply to comments (supplement five experiments, only two not supplemented, reply letter 30 pages)
December 19, 2024 (Thursday) 4:00 AM Ready for acceptance, need to modify the description of supporting information (from vague to precise, two sentences)
December 19, 2024 (Thursday) 9:34 AM Reply after modification
December 20, 2024 (Friday) 5:44 AM Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 周天月月鸟

Successfully accepted, with one major revision and one minor revision, the minor revision mainly focusing on formatting issues. Personally, I prefer ACS, and this journal seems fine as well. The impact factor has slightly decreased in the past two years, but it should increase next year. If the research is innovative, it is worth a try. The reviewers are meticulous in their feedback and the issues can be easily addressed.

(0) 讚！ | xuesejieran

Christel Bergström, it has been a month.

(0) 讚！ | 无人区玫瑰

Submitted in March 2024
Accepted on October 3, 2024
After 3 rounds of revisions and 2 additional experiments, it took approximately 7 months.
Some of the reviewer's comments were helpful in improving the quality of the article. However, the completeness of the experiments was still lacking at the time of acceptance. The editor and reviewers may have been lenient due to the innovative nature of the research.

(0) 讚！ | 斯可力

Which editor?

(0) 讚！ | hongbucuo

Submitted on September 7, 2024, it has been a week since it was assigned to the deputy editor, and it has been almost a month but still hasn't been sent for review. Why is that?

(0) 讚！ | 无人区玫瑰

5.30 accept, thank my little mol for being perfect, the efficiency of editors and reviewers is super high, gratitude and gratitude

(0) 讚！ | 白骨啸天

I am very grateful to receive it. Although the external review took two months and was a bit slow, the reviewers gave very good suggestions. After making revisions for over a month, it was quickly accepted within a week. The editor has a great attitude and works quickly. Thumbs up. It is a well-respected magazine, I hope the score could be a bit higher

(0) 讚！ | yetom

I submitted for external review on March 18th, and it has been a month but the results of the external review have not yet been released

(0) 讚！ | 晨风杉月

It's been a month and I still haven't received the review results

(0) 讚！ | 晨风杉月

It should be soon, please be patient and everything will go smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 白骨啸天

Congratulations! It has been almost a month and I am still editing here, not sure what to do

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 白骨啸天

Just wait after I submit it, I have been editing here for a month

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Thank you to the kind-hearted reviewers and editors for their efficient work. Peer review began on April 2nd, and we received revision suggestions on April 15th. There were a total of three reviewers, with the first suggesting minor revisions and the other two suggesting reconsideration after major revisions. The third reviewer is very thorough and attentive, and we are currently working on revisions. We hope for acceptance and will continue to work hard

(0) 讚！ | 白骨啸天

Have you received any news?

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Similarly, it has always been under review

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Same question, it has been under review for a long time, I don't know if it has been sent for external review

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Status is sent to the deputy editor, how long does it usually take to get reviewed externally? Submitted on 3.25

(0) 讚！ | 宗室永亮

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: peptide
Sharing experience: 
Specific situation: Submitted on 3.28, AE assigned on the same day. 
Sharing a little experience for good luck: On the submission page, it showed as "under review" right after submission. By clicking on "instructions & forms" in the top right corner, more detailed submission status can be seen. On 4.2, suddenly saw the status change to "In peer review".
Lastly, making a wish: Hope to receive minor revisions and get accepted next month

(0) 讚！ | 白骨啸天

There are four reviewers, with two providing professional feedback and the other two offering seemingly nonsensical comments without carefully reading the article. After a major revision following the first review, the submission was ultimately rejected more than a month later. It was a waste of over four months

(0) 讚！ | 浅时光

How do I see what has been edited all along?

(0) 讚！ | 五郎嘉悦