Should it be edited and audited? The status displayed by the previous reviewer during the review was: awaiting reviewer scoring

(0) 讚！ | MMMMMeng啊

Can I ask everyone if "Under review" is internal review by editors, and "Under Review" is sending for review? It has been "Under review" for about ten days and suddenly it says "awaiting Me decision," does it mean rejection?

(0) 讚！ | microeco

The whole process from submission to acceptance took more than 5 months

(0) 讚！ | Aneira

Submitted on October 6, 2023;
Major Revision on November 27, 2023, with two reviewers;
Revised and resubmitted on December 23, 2023;
Accepted on March 12, 2024

(1) 讚！ | Aneira

Submission to first received feedback took 3 months, experiencing primarily Under review; Awaiting reviewer scoring; Awaiting reviewers scoring; Awaiting ED recommendation; Awaiting ME decision; Received dozens of feedback, very professional, editor requested major revisions; Second review took a week, minor revisions (not submitted for review), accepted after one week of revisions. As a traditional ecological journal, the overall volume of submissions by Chinese researchers is around 5%, with a high demand for innovative articles. The difficulty of submission is not reflected by the impact factor

(3) 讚！ | 土水土

The authoritative classic journal in the minds of biologists focuses more on innovation and statistical methods. The long-awaited journal is finally accepted! Hope the journal will continue to improve, and it would be even better if the impact factor could be higher

(4) 讚！ | 黑夜中

Submission on August 25, 2023.
Received reviewers' comments on December 5, 2023: Major revision, to be returned within one month (one reviewer suggests major revisions, the other suggests minor revisions, and the editor ultimately recommends major revisions).
Returned for revisions on December 31, 2023.
Accepted on January 8, 2024.
Published online on January 25, 2024.
Overall submission process went as expected (3-4 months from submission to receiving reviewers' comments, similar to what most articles on the official website display). Reviewers were thorough and focused on details, asking rigorous and professional questions. The journal's quality speaks for itself, being a classic in the field of biology and ecology

(4) 讚！ | MMMMMeng啊

**
After a month and a half of being under review, yesterday it changed to the status of Awaiting Reviewer Scores. It's too slow.

**

(0) 讚！ | 中原翌喆

I was under review for over a month before receiving feedback, so I think it is being sent for external review

(0) 讚！ | Stanford BurneJones

It has been almost a month, and it is still under review. Has it not been sent for external review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 中原翌喆

It's been almost a month, and it's still under review. Has it not been sent for external review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 中原翌喆

05-Apr-2022: Submitted for review, later changed to under review and then awaiting reviewers scoring
29-Jun-2022: Delayed review due to the epidemic, officially sent to reviewers
01-Aug-2022: Reject and Offer Resubmit
25-Jun-2023: Resubmission submitted, then under review, followed by another resubmission submitted
24-Oct-2023: Under review
It has been a year and a half of torment, still no results, brothers, it's agonizing

(1) 讚！ | 摸摸流浪狗

After my resubmission was rejected, it went under review and within a week it changed to this status. How did your submission go?

(0) 讚！ | Stanford BurneJones

In the past three years, the contribution rate of mainland Chinese scholars' articles is 5.3%, which is still very significant in my view. 
Submission process: Submitted on May 28, reviewed within a week, received major revisions on June 26 with a one-month deadline. I requested a 10-day extension via email, submitted the revised manuscript on deadline day, August 5, and received acceptance of the revisions on August 10. 
Many thanks to the reviewers for their tremendous efforts

(32) 讚！ | Oevol

Awaiting reviewer scoring. This status has been ongoing for over 2 months. What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | Sam Philip

A senior fellow from the same department submitted a paper, and the reviewing process was average. The paper was submitted in mid-March, and it wasn't until mid-July that the reviewer's comments came back. After making minor revisions within 20 days, it was accepted just 3 days later. Overall, the requirements for the quality of the article were quite high, emphasizing novelty and originality. The reviewer was also very meticulous, and the suggestions provided were very helpful in improving the quality of the article.

(2) 讚！ | MMMMMeng啊

What is your research field?

(0) 讚！ | 春志少爷

Do you need to consider IF when selecting publications?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

How are SCI journals classified by sections?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

under review

(0) 讚！ | 百花令枫

Submit manuscript                     2020-10-26
Reject, but allow resubmission   2020-12-11
Submit revised manuscript         2021-01-15
Minor revision                             2021-03-01
Submit revised manuscript         2021-03-03
Accept                                        2021-03-09

Translation:
Submit manuscript                     2020-10-26
Reject, but allow resubmission   2020-12-11
Submit revised manuscript         2021-01-15
Minor revision                             2021-03-01
Submit revised manuscript         2021-03-03
Accept                                        2021-03-09

(12) 讚！ | De-Frank

Can we still keep the 5 points?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬学军

The editing is too superficial, not even able to distinguish between the whole genome and mitochondria

(0) 讚！ | 白云巧云

Recently, the review speed has slowed down. It goes without saying that the articles here are all of high quality, emphasizing novelty and large scale. 50% of the submissions are rejected after form checks

(0) 讚！ | 洗髓碧菡

The speed of recent review has slowed down. The above articles need not be said. The articles are the essence, emphasizing noverty and large scale. 50% of the manuscripts in the formal review are rejected.

(9) 讚！ | dakkghriie