期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | ANNALS OF BOTANY LetPub Score 7.7
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.8 Influence 6.7 Speed 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | ANN BOT-LONDON | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0305-7364 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1095-8290 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 153 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 5.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://academic.oup.com/aob | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | http://aob.msubmit.net/cgi-bin/main.plex | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Oxford University Press | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 生物 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1887 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 174每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 28.54% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0305-7364%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[ANNALS OF BOTANY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: zibozhou 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-05 16:50:36 評論於 Submitted on September 2, 2024, hoping for a positive outcome.(0) 讚! | zibozhou |
作者: Joe-Gloria 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-30 17:11:28 評論於 Classic journals generally have a slower processing speed, so you may need to wait a bit.(0) 讚! | Joe-Gloria |
作者: JCZ9527 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-01 16:19:24 評論於 The status of "all reviewers assigned" has been for two months now. Is it a lost cause, should we remind them?(0) 讚! | JCZ9527 |
作者: Gene+Model+Wheat 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-15 22:13:50 評論於 This year has become the second district, so the number of articles may be reduced, and the journal may not focus on the impact factor(0) 讚! | Gene+Model+Wheat |
作者: 大白兔 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-14 21:07:28 評論於 Botanical classics journal, founded more than 130 years ago, with a small number of articles, but has a huge impact worldwide, and can serve as a representative work for applying for funding!(0) 讚! | 大白兔 |
作者: Gena 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-09 14:19:05 評論於 I am in the same situation. But why can't I find any review comments?(0) 讚! | Gena |
作者: 白十二 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-08-17 10:11:40 評論於 Handling Editor Recommendation Submitted for a Month and a Half(0) 讚! | 白十二 |
作者: chiyujie 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-06-12 16:16:14 評論於 I am the same. Has the original poster received it now?(0) 讚! | chiyujie |
作者: 奉天芷若 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-06 22:44:15 評論於 This is to prevent robots from sending spam messages. Many foreign websites require verification upon login to confirm whether it is a real person. This is using Google technology, so it is generally inaccessible in China. Therefore, you may need to use a VPN and try a few times(0) 讚! | 奉天芷若 |
作者: 问春小娘子 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-05 17:25:41 評論於 Why does Annals of Botany always prompt to prove you are human when registering for an account? Any experts can help with this?(0) 讚! | 问春小娘子 |
作者: Gene+Model+Wheat 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-01-05 00:03:33 評論於 Classic botanical journal Submitted on July 28, 2022 Under review as of August 21, 2022 Rejected with encouragement on October 20, 2022 Submitted again on October 28, 2022 Under review as of November 18, 2022 Minor revision on December 12, 2022 Accepted on January 4, 2023 Overall, it was quite fast, except for the time spent finding reviewers. Went through one rejection and resubmission, and there will be a Christmas break as well.(1) 讚! | Gene+Model+Wheat |
作者: Gene+Model+Wheat 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-29 13:04:33 評論於 Will this journal take a break for Christmas?(0) 讚! | Gene+Model+Wheat |
作者: liuliushang 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-11-19 10:38:33 評論於 Then it became All reviewers assigned.(0) 讚! | liuliushang |
作者: liuliushang 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-11-03 20:40:00 評論於 The submission status changed from "Potential Reviewers Assigned" to "Contacting Potential Reviewers" after one week. What does this mean? Does it mean that the reviewers have not been found yet for the review process?(0) 讚! | liuliushang |
作者: QTL mapping 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-10-02 11:19:31 評論於 First submission: Submitted on August 8th, returned on August 18th, plagiarism check did not pass. Second submission: Submitted on August 21st All reviewers assigned on August 26th Minor revisions on September 22nd Revised on September 23rd Accepted on September 29th The submission was accepted in just over a month, the speed was very fast, and it is a reputable journal with good word-of-mouth.(0) 讚! | QTL mapping |
作者: Gene+Model+Wheat 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-08-18 09:01:45 評論於 Has anyone recently submitted? Waiting for Potential Handling Editor Assignment has been in this status for 20 days, and the submission system feels like it's from the last century.(0) 讚! | Gene+Model+Wheat |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 23:06:29 評論於 Before scientific papers are published, figures and tables must be prepared according to the requirements of the corresponding journal. Different journals have their own regulations regarding the form, layout, resolution, and so on of figures and tables in the articles(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 17:29:45 評論於 Diagrams or charts must be numbered and organized in the order mentioned in the paper(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 修然小公主 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-28 17:55:22 評論於 During the process of organizing the results, which two charts should be placed together?(0) 讚! | 修然小公主 |
作者: 八坂篷蔚 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-26 12:10:04 評論於 What kind of charts can be used to write articles?(0) 讚! | 八坂篷蔚 |
作者: 月河修文 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-04-22 23:04:29 評論於 A very good magazine that has been publishing classic literature for nearly a hundred years. The editors are very responsible, they have a good grasp of the content, and the final text editing is especially careful. Truly worthy of being a non-profit magazine that emphasizes knowledge sharing. The prerequisite for acceptance is that the experiments are innovative(0) 讚! | 月河修文 |
作者: 静默前行 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-04-22 09:42:53 評論於 Quite a good journal. It has published classic paper for nearly a hundred years. The editor was very responsible, grasped the content in place, and the final text modification was very serious. It is indeed worthy of being a non-profit journal. This journal focused on knowledge sharing and the premise of acceptance is an innovative experiment. (6) 讚! | 静默前行 |
作者: 江南福萍 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-03-13 13:28:10 評論於 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: A classic century-old journal with a good reputation and high recognition, quite good. The laboratory has already had over ten papers accepted. It has been one month since submission, the results are unknown. Looking forward to acceptance!(0) 讚! | 江南福萍 |
作者: phq 領域: 生物 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-03-13 02:37:44 評論於 It is a classical one-hundred-year-old journal with a good reputation, high recognition, which is quite good. More than 10 articles of my laboratory have been accepted. It has been one month after submission, but the result is still unknown. I am looking forward to be accepted. (1) 讚! | phq |
作者: 科研民工 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2018-03-23 21:27:43 評論於 Old-fashioned journal, good reputation, recognized by the industry, although the speed is not particularly fast, but the editor has a good grasp of the content and quality of the manuscript, the reviewer is very professional, proposedThe problem is also in place, and I have learned a lot from submission to receiving!(2) 讚! | 科研民工 |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us