It has been a month under review. The reviewer's comments have come back from ResearchGate to the journal, but the editor still has not responded

(0) 讚！ | DengYmmmm

Not open access, it has been in peer review for half a month

(0) 讚！ | DengYmmmm

This journal is basically targeted at people who are involved in certain circles!!! Destined to fail.

(0) 讚！ | Mrwenwen

Submission on February 11th, review comments were given on June 13th, and acceptance on December 4. It was very slow. Be careful!

(0) 讚！ | newton996370

It has always been under review. After we sent emails twice to urge the review, it was rejected. It took half a year, which seriously affected my graduation. Everyone, please be careful when submitting.

(1) 讚！ | 嘎子

After some twists and turns, the manuscript has been submitted to Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, and it is with editor. I don't know what it will be.

(0) 讚！ | LiZi2012

has selectd for two articles, one after the overhaul (3 and a half months), and another after the minor repair (two and a half months in the first trial, should be arbitrated once, Ou Nuo submitted to accept a total of fourmonth).Overall feeling, speed can be, editing is very professional!The reviewer is very professional.The questions are very enlightening.

(1) 讚！ | jiangyu

recommended eight reviewers,It is estimated that the editor has not adopted one, the review comments have been revised, one has rejected the draft, and the editor said that the new ideas are not enough. The original hope is that the heart is plugged.

(0) 讚！ | lpz

has two articles, but I feel that the level of this journal is getting lower and lower, and the number of citations is getting lower and lower. Oh, it is estimated that the IF of 2015 will drop.The speed of fire can no longer be submitted, it is their own efforts, looking really anxious.

(2) 讚！ | stnuc@sohu.com

After posting, stay in the editorial office for a month and a half before showing under reviewAfter 20 days, go to email and ask for no response.Pressing the display phone to call the Indians to answer the phone, saying that the transfer call was not successful.The review cycle has to be filled, I don't know when there is echo

(0) 讚！ | howei

Friends asked me to post this comment to express my dissatisfaction with this publication.What is done is the CFD simulation of the microfluidic device.I learned later that I was sent to two reviewers when I received the manuscript.Very surprisingly, both reviewers were efficient. After 10 days, the online submission system showed the required review completed. So I began to wait anxiously for the results and waited for two weeks without notice.So the boss sent an email to the system to ask about the situation, was transferred to Elsevier's managing editor, was told that the article is still doing the final processing.After a day or two, I went to the system and looked at it. I took it and went to sit out for revi

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

. It is still a very good journal in the field of microfluidics. I have 2 of them.There are 4 articles in the total, and the review speed is relatively fast. The opinions of Zhongken

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review period is nearly three months, but I feel that the editor is still quite responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing for more than a month, the editor read the previous one myself.Just raised the issue of innovation, directly listed a table to compare their own two articles.Received the next day.Very serious and responsible

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is still in the direction of micro-nano flow control, with a 10-year impact factor of 3.5 or so. The review speed is also relatively fast, and the reviewer’s comments were returned less than one month after my submission. The editor asked for revisions, and that I submit revisions in one month. After my revisions were submitted, it was accepted the next day.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is relatively fast

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

review period is around

(0) 讚！ | 匿名