10.18 Submission;
1.22 Rejected with feedback, but can be resubmitted after major revisions based on the reviewer's comments;
1.30 Resubmitted;
2.3 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | jianyuelife

Submission made on 10.25, currently still looking for reviewers

(0) 讚！ | jianyuelife

required review completed for twenty days, not sure what this step is doing, it's taking so long, will update when there is a result

(0) 讚！ | caonm

I feel pretty good. It takes one week for review, less than a month for return, minor revisions, one week to accept and submit for publication. In total, it takes 5 weeks, very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗人生

This is the most disgusting journal I have ever submitted to. The acceptance rate on its official website is 18%, but it is actually manipulated by the editors. The impact factor is actually very low. I submitted an article which was sent back to me for major revisions and resubmission three times, with two reviewers each time. Despite all the comments being positive, the total number of comments each time did not exceed 15. After each round of major revisions and resubmission, the reviewer comments were not sent back to the previous reviewers. Instead, new reviewers were sought, and the process repeated. The editor's name is Rosa Cordoba, be cautious to avoid this trap.

(3) 讚！ | 火咖

It has been two weeks for me, still editing there...

(0) 讚！ | 炸酱面CC

The editing was probably submitted for review within a week, and the first review took three months, while the second review was relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | keepsmile

May I ask how long you stayed in the editing department and how long it took for the review to receive feedback?

(0) 讚！ | 炸酱面CC

Feel the editing in optical aspects is very professional. After careful modification, it is finally accepted.

(1) 讚！ | key

Micro-nano fabrication and optical classic magazine, the opinions of the editors and experts are all good.

(7) 讚！ | keepsmile

Journal homepage URL: http://Www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /505660/description

(5) 讚！ | 匿名