期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | MICROCHIMICA ACTA LetPub Score 7.7
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.3 Influence 6.9 Speed 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | MICROCHIM ACTA | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0026-3672 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1436-5073 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 74 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 3.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.springer.com/604 | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/miac/ | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Springer Vienna | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 化学 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | AUSTRIA | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1937 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 461每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 8.14% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0026-3672%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 52 days, Submission to first decision 112 days, Submission to acceptance 來自作者的數據: About 1.4 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 33% | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[MICROCHIMICA ACTA] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 小小牛-2 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-19 23:02:12 評論於 Upon checking, it turns out to be a second district...(0) 讚! | 小小牛-2 |
作者: 小小牛-2 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-19 23:00:59 評論於 Just reviewed the draft, and they gave me 7 days to review it. After 7 days, they made a decision for major revisions. Despite not fully agreeing with the quality of the article, I still gave in and made the major revisions.(0) 讚! | 小小牛-2 |
作者: xianghenaicha 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-01 18:36:08 評論於 Hello, may I ask what the next step is after submission under peer review, and how long it took you to reach the next step?(0) 讚! | xianghenaicha |
作者: ETttt 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-21 12:18:36 評論於 I couldn't find it either, a single column will be fine.(0) 讚! | ETttt |
作者: xianghenaicha 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-12 10:48:39 評論於 Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has a Word template. I couldn't find it on the official website. Can I submit the manuscript in single column format or does it need to be changed to double column?(0) 讚! | xianghenaicha |
作者: ETttt 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-18 09:44:15 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as the titles(0) 讚! | ETttt |
作者: 科研小白兔 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-14 21:12:32 評論於 How many reviewers do you have?(0) 讚! | 科研小白兔 |
作者: ETttt 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-14 14:55:34 評論於 Submitted on December 11th, revised on January 22nd, with a one-month deadline. Both the reviewers and editors provided detailed feedback! The editor even taught me how to revise the abstract! After making the changes, the language level has greatly improved. Due to not being able to make revisions during the Chinese New Year, the deadline was extended by a week. Three days after resubmitting revisions, the paper was accepted. The proofreading process took two weeks, and the attitude was great! They were also very efficient. I encourage everyone to submit their work!(0) 讚! | ETttt |
作者: lucky123hhh 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-08-30 16:21:12 評論於 If the waiting time exceeds half a month, it is better to write a reminder letter to prevent any mistakes in the handover between the editorial department and the publishing house(0) 讚! | lucky123hhh |
作者: Wzm 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-07-27 08:47:06 評論於 May I ask how long it takes for you to proofread? After receiving it, can I just wait?(0) 讚! | Wzm |
作者: 要什么昵称 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-07-13 18:00:28 評論於 The submission cycle is written too little, maybe about three months.(0) 讚! | 要什么昵称 |
作者: 要什么昵称 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-07-13 17:59:05 評論於 This magazine is a bit slow, so please be cautious when considering submitting. I often review and complete it within two or three days, but it takes a couple of months to see the required reviews completed. After receiving the reviewers' comments, the editor will also review the manuscript and ask very detailed questions. If you're not in a rush, you can give it a try as it helps to standardize writing.(0) 讚! | 要什么昵称 |
作者: 投搞一直被拒 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-07-07 22:31:55 評論於 Can those who make fluorescent probes submit to this journal? Distinguished academicians and outstanding young scholars.(0) 讚! | 投搞一直被拒 |
作者: 勇敢牛牛 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-22 14:37:52 評論於 It has been almost two months and I am still under.(0) 讚! | 勇敢牛牛 |
作者: 852247316 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-21 15:51:44 評論於 Excuse me, is this magazine fast? How long does it take to receive the first feedback, approximately two months?(0) 讚! | 852247316 |
作者: sss12345 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-10 16:56:58 評論於 Not bad, the suggestions for the major renovation are very professional, and many valuable questions have been raised.(0) 讚! | sss12345 |
作者: lucky123hhh 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-04 09:40:25 評論於 Hello! I would like to ask how long it takes for the proofreading process? It has been a month since the article was submitted, and there hasn't been any other updates.(0) 讚! | lucky123hhh |
作者: lucky123hhh 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-04 09:37:11 評論於 May I ask how long it took for the proofreading process? The article has been submitted for a month already, and surprisingly, it still hasn't been proofread.(0) 讚! | lucky123hhh |
作者: 1995@ecut 666 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-02-18 20:26:24 評論於 There are five reviewers, and the review process takes one month. Please be patient and wait.(1) 讚! | 1995@ecut 666 |
作者: oolili 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-16 01:06:03 評論於 11.30 with editor 12.3 editor invited 12.3 with editor 12.3 under review, reviewers invited 12.5 under review, reviewers agreed 12.15 required reviews completed Wish good luck.(0) 讚! | oolili |
作者: lucky123hhh 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-08 14:23:37 評論於 What other statuses are there after "under review"?(0) 讚! | lucky123hhh |
作者: lucky123hhh 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-07 16:19:17 評論於 Hello! May I ask what are the possible states of this journal? My article has been under review for almost three weeks. Will there be any statuses like "required review completed" before major or minor revisions?(0) 讚! | lucky123hhh |
作者: 1995@ecut 666 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-06 20:58:34 評論於 The reviewers are very conscientious, and the longstanding journal is still good.(7) 讚! | 1995@ecut 666 |
作者: oolili 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-11-26 03:48:20 評論於 The translation of the text is as follows: Microchimica acta 2022.10.4 submitted 10.7 editor assigned 10.8 reject and resubmit 11.9 resubmitted 11.15 with editor 11.18 editor invited Too slow.(4) 讚! | oolili |
作者: yanweizhen 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-10-13 13:08:40 評論於 Submitted: 11 November 2021 Refused and resubmitted: 5 January 2022 Resubmitted: 23 March 2022 Major revision: 17 May 2022 Accepted: 31 May 2022 Published: 04 July 2022 This journal is not as slow as everyone thinks, and the self-citation rate has been declining for two consecutive years, while the impact factor is still rising. In the first round of review, there were two reviewers, one rejection and one editor, who raised many meaningful questions. In the second round of review after resubmission, there were still two reviewers, one minor revision and the other still the editor, who ultimately suggested major revisions. The suggestions given by both editors were very rigorous, even pointing out many typos and symbol-related issues. The major revision response was 4000 words, and it was directly accepted. It is important to seriously supplement experiments and provide sincere responses. I hope everyone will cite it more to increase the impact factor.(4) 讚! | yanweizhen |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us