Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has a Word template. I couldn't find it on the official website. Can I submit the manuscript in single column format or does it need to be changed to double column?

(0) 讚！ | xianghenaicha

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as the titles

(0) 讚！ | ETttt

How many reviewers do you have?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白兔

Submitted on December 11th, revised on January 22nd, with a one-month deadline. Both the reviewers and editors provided detailed feedback! The editor even taught me how to revise the abstract! After making the changes, the language level has greatly improved. Due to not being able to make revisions during the Chinese New Year, the deadline was extended by a week. Three days after resubmitting revisions, the paper was accepted. The proofreading process took two weeks, and the attitude was great! They were also very efficient. I encourage everyone to submit their work!

(0) 讚！ | ETttt

If the waiting time exceeds half a month, it is better to write a reminder letter to prevent any mistakes in the handover between the editorial department and the publishing house

(0) 讚！ | lucky123hhh

May I ask how long it takes for you to proofread? After receiving it, can I just wait?

(0) 讚！ | Wzm

The submission cycle is written too little, maybe about three months.

(0) 讚！ | 要什么昵称

This magazine is a bit slow, so please be cautious when considering submitting. I often review and complete it within two or three days, but it takes a couple of months to see the required reviews completed. After receiving the reviewers' comments, the editor will also review the manuscript and ask very detailed questions. If you're not in a rush, you can give it a try as it helps to standardize writing.

(0) 讚！ | 要什么昵称

Can those who make fluorescent probes submit to this journal? Distinguished academicians and outstanding young scholars.

(0) 讚！ | 投搞一直被拒

It has been almost two months and I am still under.

(0) 讚！ | 勇敢牛牛

Excuse me, is this magazine fast? How long does it take to receive the first feedback, approximately two months?

(0) 讚！ | 852247316

Not bad, the suggestions for the major renovation are very professional, and many valuable questions have been raised.

(0) 讚！ | sss12345

Hello! I would like to ask how long it takes for the proofreading process? It has been a month since the article was submitted, and there hasn't been any other updates.

(0) 讚！ | lucky123hhh

May I ask how long it took for the proofreading process? The article has been submitted for a month already, and surprisingly, it still hasn't been proofread.

(0) 讚！ | lucky123hhh

There are five reviewers, and the review process takes one month. Please be patient and wait.

(1) 讚！ | 1995@ecut 666

11.30 with editor
12.3 editor invited
12.3 with editor
12.3 under review, reviewers invited
12.5 under review, reviewers agreed
12.15 required reviews completed
Wish good luck.

(0) 讚！ | oolili

What other statuses are there after "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | lucky123hhh

Hello! May I ask what are the possible states of this journal? My article has been under review for almost three weeks. Will there be any statuses like "required review completed" before major or minor revisions?

(0) 讚！ | lucky123hhh

The reviewers are very conscientious, and the longstanding journal is still good.

(7) 讚！ | 1995@ecut 666

The translation of the text is as follows:

Microchimica acta
2022.10.4 submitted
10.7 editor assigned
10.8 reject and resubmit
11.9 resubmitted
11.15 with editor
11.18 editor invited
Too slow.

(4) 讚！ | oolili

Submitted: 11 November 2021
Refused and resubmitted: 5 January 2022
Resubmitted: 23 March 2022
Major revision: 17 May 2022
Accepted: 31 May 2022
Published: 04 July 2022

This journal is not as slow as everyone thinks, and the self-citation rate has been declining for two consecutive years, while the impact factor is still rising.
In the first round of review, there were two reviewers, one rejection and one editor, who raised many meaningful questions. In the second round of review after resubmission, there were still two reviewers, one minor revision and the other still the editor, who ultimately suggested major revisions. The suggestions given by both editors were very rigorous, even pointing out many typos and symbol-related issues. The major revision response was 4000 words, and it was directly accepted. It is important to seriously supplement experiments and provide sincere responses. I hope everyone will cite it more to increase the impact factor.

(4) 讚！ | yanweizhen

Sent four reviewers, three of them gave feedback, one of which is the editor! It's just that the proofreading process is a bit slow!

(1) 讚！ | 做最好的自己123

I want to ask the original poster, how many reviewers are there?

(0) 讚！ | 花落未央Smile

I submitted it on July 14th, and it is still under review until now. It's really slow, I'm afraid I won't be able to graduate on time...

(0) 讚！ | Yu Han

Please fill in the table below and the proof is a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | 做最好的自己123