Hello, have you noticed any changes on the Aisville public account? What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | libre

The paper was submitted for external review on August 11th, and it has been 100 days since then with no feedback received. Attempts to contact the editor, Miguel Delaguardia, have been unsuccessful as emails go unanswered. This journal used to review manuscripts multiple times with a turnaround time of around 21 days. It is unclear why the editorial process is being delayed. Graduating students are advised to be cautious when submitting manuscripts to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 小雷

Submitted on March 18th, withdrawn on November 16th, under review the whole time. The rejection letter stated that they will not consider our journal in the future and will not review our submissions.

(0) 讚！ | JNUfeng

Why did MJ stop updating?

(0) 讚！ | Felixzp

I have also been accepted, but I have not received the proof email in two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 分析化学

No translation provided.

(0) 讚！ | 球accpet

The journal process is quite fast, thanks to the editors and three reviewers. The review process was quick, with many suggestions. After conducting additional experiments and responding to the comments, the paper was accepted.
9-3 Submitted;
10-15 Submitted revised manuscript;
10-17 Accepted;
10-20 Online.

(0) 讚！ | cryst

Have you found a reviewer after the rework?

(0) 讚！ | yann00

This journal is very fast because there are fewer people who know about it, so it feels relatively good. It is a serious top journal in the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, with a promising future.

(0) 讚！ | xuesejieran

7.3 stj
7.4 we
7.8 UR
8.5 major revision
9.28 resub
10.13 rrc
10.15 accepted

I submitted to many journals along the way, all of which were rejected. I am very grateful to the editors and reviewers of this journal, a total of three reviewers, who provided valuable feedback. I learned a lot, especially from the third reviewer. Although there were a couple of questions that were challenging to answer, it was very helpful for future writing standards. Once again, thank you to the journal and the reviewers! I hope the journal continues to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 球accpet

How many reviewers are there in the first round of reviews? Are the comments strict after revision? Are they the same reviewers as before?

(0) 讚！ | yann00

5.22 submitted
6.5 with editing
6.15 under review
8.3 major revision
9.1 resubmitted
9.30 accepted

(0) 讚！ | Www.lz

Thank you for your answer.

(0) 讚！ | yann00

Two reviewers b

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Answerer, how many reviewers does this journal need to invite? It took me over a month to find just one reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | yann00

20240906提交

Submitted on September 6, 2024

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

一样的 - The same

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Could you please explain what is required for the conflict of interest statement and declaration of interest statement in the uploaded files? They seem to be quite similar.

(0) 讚！ | s835074144

This paper was accepted so quickly, thanks a lot to all the editors and reviewers! Best wishes for Microchemica Journal to continue to thrive.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Not very fast either, the first reviewer was quick, it was only after inviting the reviewer twice that the second reviewer agreed to review.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Congratulations, has your article been quickly accepted for review by a reviewer? It feels so fast, it was accepted and reviewed in just a few days.

(0) 讚！ | yann00

Both reviewers agree to publish, with the suggestion for minor revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

How about the reviewer's comments on the draft?

(0) 讚！ | yann00

Today the status has changed to "Decision in Process", hopefully it's not a bad thing.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

The speed is very fast.

(0) 讚！ | lzy