Before sent to reviewers, all author should accept the submission.
I received feedback from the editor, a key leader, and two reviewers, totaling more than 20 comments. We are required to respond comprehensively to every comment made by the editor, the key leader, and both reviewers. Additionally, I have been asked to revise the English language in the manuscript with assistance from a language editing service to ensure clarity and accuracy.

(0) 讚！ | Nguyen HV

Manuscript Sent to Production 2024-11-06
Manuscript Accepted 2024-11-04
Decision Made 2024-11-04
Decision Pending 2024-11-01
Manuscript Decision Made 2024-11-01
Decision Made 2024-11-01
Under Review 2024-10-31
Under Consideration 2024-10-29
Submission 2024-10-29
Major revise 2024-08-07
Under Review2024-07-02
Under Consideration 2024-06-21
transferred to MMTA - Manuscript Accepted 2024-06-21
Submission 2024-06-12 to MMTB

(0) 讚！ | Nguyen HV

It has been under review for a month and a half, and there has been no change. Anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 小孙aaa

Should the response to the comments from the reviewers include the "points in favor" and "points detracting" sections from the email, or just address the suggestions in the attached PDF?

(0) 讚！ | ACve1

Should the response to this review include the Reviewer (Points In Favor) and Reviewer (Points Detracting) sections in the email, or just reply to the suggestions in the PDF attachment?

(0) 讚！ | ACve1

It is indeed necessary to have agreement from all authors before submission. The corresponding author can see which authors have not yet confirmed in the system

(0) 讚！ | Voyager X

I also want to ask this question

(0) 讚！ | 小孙aaa

I would like to ask the senior authors who have submitted manuscripts, do all authors need to agree before the manuscript is reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 小孙aaa

Is there any change?

(0) 讚！ | ACve1

Do all authors really have to accept to review?

(1) 讚！ | ACve1

Hi, how long has it been since there has been a change in status?

(0) 讚！ | yyyd

It has been 22 days and it is still under consideration

(0) 讚！ | 三三sansan

It's been a week since I applied, but I haven't heard anything yet. Have you received any results?

(0) 讚！ | 白小羊

Manuscript Accepted 2023-11-13
Decision Made 2023-11-13
Decision Pending 2023-11-12
Manuscript Decision Made 2023-11-12
Decision Made 2023-11-12
Under Review 2023-10-23
Under Consideration 2023-10-18
Submission 2023-10-18
Major revise 2023-10-10
Under Review 2023-9-19
Under Consideration 2023-8-22
Submission 2023-8-22
Two reviewers, over 20 comments, feedback feels like it's from peer experts, very detailed and professional. In addition, high requirements for references and language.
Accepted after two and a half months, happy!

(1) 讚！ | Finn123

A month and a half, accept, awesome

(0) 讚！ | yongdu

After submitting the revised manuscript, I received an acceptance email 25 days later. The speed was average, but it wasn't too slow. Although the impact factor of this journal is not high, it is a well-established journal that our supervisor really likes. I am very satisfied to have my first long article published in this journal during my doctoral stage, even though the revision process was tough, the end result was not disappointing

(0) 讚！ | 小涛

Received revision notice after more than 2 months of submission, with a revision period of two months. Two reviewers jointly provided over fifty comments. The comments were very professional and reasonable, indicating that the reviewers for this journal are very professional and responsible. The questions raised were rigorous and detailed. The response letter consisted of over ten thousand words, exceeding the word count of the manuscript

(2) 讚！ | 小涛

Already cast, praying for good luck.

(0) 讚！ | yongdu

Get feedback on the manuscript in a month. Make improvements based on the revisions. Finally accepted, very grateful to the reviewers and editors. Hope the journal will continue to improve!

(0) 讚！ | 简介

Hahaha, I am a second-year research sister? You are quite skilled at this, it's really disgusting. Are you truly an academic Daji?

(0) 讚！ | WFZ1

I have only submitted an article on the phase transition of pearlite before, and I can only say that the key reader was too professional. They asked very insightful questions, and it was very meticulous. At that time, it was in Zone 3. It was because of the issue of zoning that I did not submit again. It left a deep impression on me, but it's not because the reviewers asked too many questions. To be honest, every article will have questions raised. It is the reviewers' professionalism and focus on the core points that matter. It's a pity that I don't know why the zoning was so low.

(0) 讚！ | MMT A

The content of the article is about the transformation of austenitic stainless steel. It is written in a communicative manner and the speed is relatively fast. The reviewers and editors are also very rigorous. Friendly reminder, after submitting, each author needs to confirm before it can be reviewed.

(8) 讚！ | 学术小垃圾呀

2021.6.13 Submitted
2021.6.20 Under review
2021.10.20 Revised (with more than 20 comments from two reviewers)
2021.10.29 Revised
2021.11.8 Under review
2022.1.27 Tentatively accepted (requires polishing)

(3) 讚！ | corsci

I am a 2nd-year graduate student. I don't understand the knowledge about reverse austenite and would like to ask for help. If you see this, please reply.

(6) 讚！ | daizhiyong

Submission, 2020-04-19; Under review, 2020-05-01; Waiting for revision, 2020-06-04; Submission, 2020-08-18; Under review, 2020-08-19; Waiting for revision, 2020-09-08; Submission, 2020-09-16; Under consideration, 2020-09-16; Manuscript accepted, 2020-09-25.

(1) 讚！ | 奥氏体不锈钢