Some of the editors were emailed at the end of February, and it was mentioned that one reviewer had already returned their feedback, while the other had accepted but not yet provided feedback

(0) 讚！ | qi123456

May I ask why your initial review takes so long? Have you sent emails to reviewers to inquire about the status of the review? I have also been under review for over 3 months

(0) 讚！ | 好菜芽

Yes, QC is a review of formats and the like. The editorial team will look at it first before deciding whether to send it for external review

(0) 讚！ | qi123456

I want to ask if QC reviews need to be edited and reviewed again to truly be under review after modification

(0) 讚！ | 东北刘昊然

Submission on December 1, 2023.
Major revision on March 28, 2024 (20 comments from one reviewer, 3 comments from another reviewer).
Revised on April 3, 2024.
Minor revision on May 16, 2024 (7 comments from one reviewer, 1 comment from another reviewer).
Revised on May 16, 2024.

Direction of Medical Image Processing
The reviewers' comments are very professional and useful for improving the quality of the article, but the editorial department is not very efficient

(0) 讚！ | qi123456

The speed is indeed slow

(0) 讚！ | 汐渊

Under Review	21
Initial QC Complete	21-Apr
Initial QC Started	20-Apr
Author-Approved Files Submitted	20-Apr
Associate Editor was changed to Assigned in 24 days. The topic is medical imaging + computer

(0) 讚！ | 汐渊

Are you using the LaTeX single-column template provided on the official website?

(0) 讚！ | MW

Did you end up using Word later?

(0) 讚！ | MW

Can I submit my paper to the same reviewer who provided over 20 comments and rejected it? They said it can be resubmitted after revisions

(0) 讚！ | 飞翔2047

The manuscript should be conditionally accepted pending major revisions

(0) 讚！ | zsc

Hello, may I ask if the decision on your manuscript is Editorial decision deferred: Major revision or Conditionally Accept: Major revision?

(0) 讚！ | qi123456

Lasting for 8 months, acceptance after major and minor repairs

(0) 讚！ | zsc

Received rejection after five months of submission, four reviewers provided a lot of emphasis on methodological and technological innovations, identifying problems and suggesting improvement plans. However, despite more than ten in-depth comments from the Associate Editor, the paper was still rejected due to perceived lack of scientific contribution. With the impending graduation, waiting any longer is not an option, and the paper was rejected directly by the editor even after making revisions based on reviewers' suggestions. Additionally, both reviewers and editor were overly strict, even bordering on harsh

(0) 讚！ | BigComputer

May I ask everyone, Editorial decision deferred: Major revision with full peer review, do we need to invite new reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | qi123456

Submitted on January 10th, sent out for external review on the 27th; received rejection on April 13th, delaying for 3 months. Very strict and difficult, my writing initially caused ambiguity, the reviewers did not understand my method, so after rejection, they requested a revision for resubmission. However, I could not afford the time for the revision, so I followed the revision suggestions and submitted to another journal. Will have to keep improving in the future, it is indeed strict

(0) 讚！ | Cathy Xue

Have you gotten the results?

(0) 讚！ | 必中一区top

If there are minor revisions, will the reviewers take 7 days or 14 days to review?

(0) 讚！ | Friendly

How are you doing, OP? If minor revisions are required, will the reviewers take 7 days or 14 days to review?

(0) 讚！ | Friendly

How did it turn out?

(0) 讚！ | Friendly

Submitted in early September 2023, underwent major revisions by the end of December; revised in early February, returned to the editor in mid-February, spent a month and a half with the associate editor, the associate editor spent three days with the editor-in-chief, who is currently preparing the Decision Letter; The delay has been too long, and I am very worried about the outcome

(0) 讚！ | zsc

Yes, but I don't know how to remove it, and I don't have time to research the code to set the style. Just wanted to complain about why there isn't a version for authors to submit directly according to the template

(0) 讚！ | GoldenYD

It has been a week under review and AE has not been assigned yet. Does anyone know how long this step will take?

(0) 讚！ | GoldenYD

This is because the note information in the template was not deleted

(0) 讚！ | ljyw17

I formatted it according to the official website provided by LaTeX, and the track trace is included in the template, so I later updated a version without using LaTeX

(0) 讚！ | GoldenYD