The submission was rejected on the same day because it did not meet the scope

(0) 讚！ | Jay0304

1. submitted 2024.1.17
2. major revise 2024.4.30
3. revised 2024.5.29
4. accept 2024.5.31
Editorial efficiency is super high!!!!

(0) 讚！ | LYYZH

1. Submitted  2023.12.21
2. Rejected    2023.12.21
3. Re-submitted 2024.01.03
4. with Editor    2024.01.04
5. Under Review 2024.01.09
6. New Reviewer Invited 2024.01.24
7. Major Revise     2024.03.24
8. Revised             2024.04.16 
9. Accept               2024.05.29
The editor is efficient, but one of the reviewers is extremely slow

(0) 讚！ | Shaoxun

I have already been accepted by two articles. This journal focuses on theory, not only requiring theoretical innovation in content, but also in the writing style. The content needs to be within its scope, once I wrote something that was too controlling, and it was rejected directly

(0) 讚！ | 不懂吃的吃货

Submitted to the editorial department on May 20th, with editor on the same day, will continue to be updated in the future

(0) 讚！ | 郭凯凯

Bro, how are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 俯瞰珈蓝

How is my brother doing now?

(1) 讚！ | 俯瞰珈蓝

I saw that they have invited more reviewers from the public account, and now we are still waiting for the results~~~~~~, ummmmm may be a direction issue, I don't know how long we have to wait

(0) 讚！ | Shaoxun

How have you been recently, OP?

(0) 讚！ | chrisone

With Editor 2024.01.04
Under Review 2024.01.09
..................No one has accepted the review yet.......what should I do?

(4) 讚！ | Shaoxun

The first submission was rejected by the editor one day later due to word count and formatting issues. After meeting the requirements, it was resubmitted for review

(0) 讚！ | tzxtoiny

Sharing Good Fortune

(0) 讚！ | lyf

Bask in good luck and things will go smoothly all the way!

(0) 讚！ | 心心不一般

Many scopes do not match indeed

(0) 讚！ | 幸运的Eric

Submitted on July 31, received feedback on August 30. There were many comments from five reviewers, so the editor requested major revisions and resubmission. Resubmitted on October 17, received feedback on November 16. Again, major revisions were required, but two reviewers agreed to accept the paper. Revised submission on November 24, accepted on December 7. Overall, the process was quite fast and the reviewers' feedback was very professional, greatly improving the quality of the paper

(0) 讚！ | Southsunset

Oct 28, 2023 Submitted to Journal
Oct 29, 2023 Reject
The topic is not suitable, processed very quickly

(5) 讚！ | LMY

The top journal in the field of institutional studies, winning it still made me very happy inside. In recent years, it has consistently been in the top quartile, with an increased impact factor, leading to a much higher difficulty in submissions

(12) 讚！ | tb96553712

2023.08.03 Submitted to Journal

(1) 讚！ | ZF

I don't know what the editor-in-chief is up to this year. Several papers from the lab are not being sent for review, claiming they don't fit the focus. It feels like the difficulty of getting papers reviewed has suddenly become very high, even though the number of manuscripts is not that many.

(0) 讚！ | Southeast-wind

Translation: 
The submitted institution-related academic content was rejected by the editor within three days, citing that the research direction does not match. If it was a formatting error, would they specifically mention the formatting error or simply state that the research direction does not match?

(8) 讚！ | LKN

MMT Journal, do all authors need to give their consent before submitting? Do all authors need to click on the link below before submitting? Please read the following statement and confirm your agreement by clicking on this link: Yes, I am affiliated.

(0) 讚！ | 快乐出发

Is there a delay in receiving the registration confirmation email sent when registering for this magazine? I haven't received it for half a day. Have you ever encountered this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 清扬婉兮0701

Have you ever encountered a situation where you haven't received the registration confirmation email from this magazine even after half a day?

(0) 讚！ | 清扬婉兮0701

The editor is very responsible and has high requirements for content and format. In order to pass the editor's review, I made more than ten revisions before finally agreeing to submit it for review. The processing speed afterwards was very fast, thumbs up. The two reviewers afterwards, Reviewer #2 gave full affirmation to the article, while the other one sneered at it. After the revisions, I convinced all the reviewers and the editor decided to accept it. The dream journal, looking back, feels like a dream. I hope to keep up the good work in the future.
2022.10.10 Submitted
2022.12.13 Major revise
2023.1.25 Accept

(4) 讚！ | Southeast-wind

In general, MMT is considered a good journal in the field of institutional studies as it has fast review processes and publishes some high-quality articles. However, I personally believe that there are some issues, such as the presence of many articles that are well-developed but lack innovation.

(3) 讚！ | yxcsatjzsj