Hello, may I ask specifically what category it falls under?
I feel like I'm in danger too, I haven't done almost any signal processing.

(0) 讚！ | ganlet

Sorry, sent it to the wrong person.

(0) 讚！ | ganlet

Hello, can I ask for some advice on submitting articles? I only have experience submitting to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | dsy945.

Hello, may I ask about your experience in submitting manuscripts? I am the only one submitting to this journal and it's quite overwhelming.

(0) 讚！ | dsy945.

Hello, may I ask about your experience in submitting contributions?

(0) 讚！ | dsy945.

It should be once a month.

(0) 讚！ | sypsyp

Currently this status: Required Reviews Completed
How long is it expected to take to have results? 
Will it take a long time?

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Okay, thank you. I have over 4600, it looks like I'll have to wait for a while.

(0) 讚！ | 夏洛不烦恼

In September, more than 3800.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

Hello, may I ask what is the number of your article?

(0) 讚！ | 夏洛不烦恼

Not sent, said my research area intersects with MSSP, but is not in the field of signal processing, and then gave me a desk reject.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

For so long, the editor's response is that the submission volume is too high. If already invited, the status should be editor invited.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

Why has it been so long? If you have already invited reviewers but no one has accepted, will the status show as "WE" or "Under review"?

(0) 讚！ | 科研练习生2.5

Hey, have you submitted your work for external review yet?

(0) 讚！ | Zzr

11.16 拒绝

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

Indeed, sweat is pouring down my back.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

Dude, the speed of this review is making me sweat buckets.

(0) 讚！ | ganlet

11.13 Still WE, good good good.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

Submitted on 8.31, after being invited by the editor, then working with the editor, and being invited by the editor again, it is still awaiting review at the moment.

(0) 讚！ | Rookie1

Editor-in-chief, hand shaking and typing fast~

(0) 讚！ | Steve_Zhang

6.21 submit
8.1 UR 12→6, with ten thousand alpacas in my heart
9.3 Major 5 reviewer comments, 4 major revisions
10.3 Revision back R1
10.6 UR 5→4, reviewers with no comments in the first round did not accept the review
11.3 Minor 4 to 3, the handling editor terminated the review process early, and one reviewer raised a minor issue and suggested additional experiments
11.6 Revision back Minor issues can be addressed, experiments will not be added, politely declining the request for experiments. R2
11.10 Accept Direct acceptance by the handling editor, no external review.
After two rounds of revisions, the paper was finally accepted. The major revision took a month, peeling off a layer of skin, adding data and simulations, and ultimately submitting on the last day.
Tip: There was a small incident in the middle. After receiving the Minor comments from reviewer R1, there was an editor's comment. Subconsciously thinking it was the Editor-in-Chief, I made a mistake, but the acceptance letter specifically noted, "on behalf of Prof. Mottershead."

(0) 讚！ | Steve_Zhang

8.5 200 cast
8.6 210
9.20 220
9.25 221
10.5 222
10.8 Minor revision
10.12 Return
10.17 accepted

(1) 讚！ | Tang1234

Submitted to journal on 11.11
Under editor review on 11.12

(0) 讚！ | 甘let

What speed is this!

(0) 讚！ | 墨萧韶

Submit to journal 7.25
with Editor 7.26
Editor invited 8.25
Under Review 9.2
Required Reviews Completed 2 reviewers 10.3
Required Reviews Completed 2 reviewers 10.8
major revision 10.8
Submit to journal 10.31
Under Review 11.2

Hope for the best, wish me luck.

(0) 讚！ | jdbd