Rework completed, has been received. Thank you very much.

(0) 讚！ | 悲伤大蛤蟆

On September 9th, I received an email requesting for a second revision. The questions were not too difficult, and I hope to pass.

(0) 讚！ | 悲伤大蛤蟆

I don't know what's going on with this journal recently (see the comments below, pushing the editor and immediately getting rejected, I dare not push). The article was revised in June, and it is still under review. Although it has indeed taken too long this time, it is still the first journal I submitted my paper to. Hopefully it will be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 悲伤大蛤蟆

Just reviewed an article from this journal, giving the reviewers only half a month. It shouldn't take that long.

(0) 讚！ | 有点可惜

This journal, which I submitted to SCI for the first time, was not written very well. I made a lot of revisions, but in the end, it was still accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 天府小罗罗

It's hard to evaluate, submitted on 4/28, three reviewers accepted the review. The first reviewer replied on 6/16, and the second reviewer replied on 7/2. Then there was no movement. Because I was in a hurry, I politely asked about the status of the editorial on 7/23, and the editor replied in the morning of the 24th that they were waiting for the opinion of the third reviewer, but then directly rejected the submission in the evening. The reviewers' opinions were clearly positive, with only minor revisions needed. I urgently need the article for graduation or to meet the deadline for scholarship selection. It's too slow, and it could also be just my bad luck.

(0) 讚！ | 快点accept好不好

As the review process was taking too long, I politely sent an email to inquire about the status with the editor, but the editor unexpectedly rejected the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 快点accept好不好

Does this journal support checking the review status via WeChat?

(0) 讚！ | 携李

After being sent for external review, it was rejected. The reviewer strongly demanded rejection due to formatting issues, which was quite inexplicable.

(0) 讚！ | 一个混子

I am also one of them. I submitted my application at the end of April and it went under review within two to three days. However, it is still under review as of 7/13. It's so difficult, I'm very anxious ??.

(0) 讚！ | 快点accept好不好

Have you received the message?

(0) 讚！ | panghu

2024.3.25 submitted to journal
3.25 with editor
3.25 under review
4.30 under review (one reviewer completed the review)
5.25 review completed (the last two reviewers did not complete the review, and the editor gave 3 weeks for major revision based on the first reviewer's comments)
6.14 under review after revision
6.23 accepted
The whole review process took 3 months. Best wishes for the journal to become better and have a higher impact factor!

(0) 讚！ | Under Dog

6.7 Submission
6.7 With editor
6.17 Reminder for submission
6.17 Submitted in the morning and under review in the afternoon, not sure why
6.17 Invited three reviewers
6.18 No one accepted the invitation

(0) 讚！ | 霞

There is a paper tracking feature on the Aisville public account

(0) 讚！ | 小公举的小熊维尼

Hello, what is the status of the submission?

(0) 讚！ | xiagutiantian

Hello, I submitted my paper on 26th April 2024 and it went under review the next day. The status has not changed since then, and the date has also remained the same. What is the situation and where can I see the information of the reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | xiagutiantian

Submitted on 26th April 2023, it went under review the next day. It's still the same as of today, 7th May. Could you tell me if it's undergoing internal or external review?

(0) 讚！ | xiagutiantian

Revised twice, feedback was given about one month after each revision. The editorial process was very efficient. Wishing the journal all the best for the future

(0) 讚！ | erbnh300

Hello, may I ask if we can see the status of editors finding reviewers after the submission status changes to "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | 琳荙

Hello, I would like to ask, after the submission status changes to "under review," can I see the status of the editor finding a reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 琳荙

2023.02.22 Submission
2023.04.17 Received reviewer comments, all three reviewers suggest major revisions
2023.05.28 Submitted revised version
2023.06.14 Received reviewer comments, two reviewers suggest minor revisions, while one suggests acceptance
2023.06.26 Submitted revised version
2023.06.27 Accepted
Overall, the reviewing process and editorial handling were very fast, and the reviewers were also very professional, greatly helping to improve the overall quality of the article.

(0) 讚！ | 树树树

2022
12.20 submitted to journal
12.20 with editor
2023
01.05 under review
03.01 under review
04.19 under review
05.07 Major revision, given 3 weeks to make changes
05.28 Returned revised manuscript
06.16 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 小公举的小熊维尼

6.12 Accepted wrote it wrong (0-0)

(0) 讚！ | something

4.15 JAC transfer submitted
4.18 with editor
4.19 with editor
4.28 under review Review invitations sent: 4
4.29 under review Review invitations accepted: 1
5.5 reviewed completed: 1
5.8 invitations sent: 4+3
5.9 invitations accepted: 2
5.18 reviewed completed: 2
5.20 revise (reviewed completed: 3) Due on June 10
6.3 revise submission
6.6 required review completed (2)
6.6 under review
6.11 Required Reviews Complete 3
3.12 Accepted

Translation: 
4.15 JAC transfer submitted
4.18 with editor
4.19 with editor
4.28 under review Review invitations sent: 4
4.29 under review Review invitations accepted: 1
5.5 reviewed completed: 1
5.8 invitations sent: 4+3
5.9 invitations accepted: 2
5.18 reviewed completed: 2
5.20 revise (reviewed completed: 3) Due on June 10
6.3 revise submission
6.6 required review completed (2)
6.6 under review
6.11 Required Reviews Complete 3
3.12 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | something

Feb 21 with editor
Mar 1 under review
Mar 30 revise Two invitations, three reviewers, 21 comments
Apr 14 with editor
Apr 19 under review
May 7 revise I don't know why another reviewer was invited again, a total of 12 comments including one raised by the editor
May 10 with editor
May 14 accept

(0) 讚！ | sally123