Hey, what's happening with the Decision in Process?

(0) 讚！ | accepted

10.11 提交到期刊
10.15 与编辑沟通
11.18 适度修改

(0) 讚！ | Handsowei

Special thanks to Professor Zheng, the editor, who gave us the opportunity to revise after rejecting the manuscript, and eventually accepted it. Thank you for your support.

(1) 讚！ | 汉斯小木屋

From submission to acceptance in 45 days, the process was very fast and the editor was very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 顶针QAQ

Is it because the journal article was not cited? The submission to JCIS did not cite the journal article, and although the editor expressed appreciation for the work, they politely declined it due to mismatched direction.

(0) 讚！ | Handsowei

10.11提交给期刊
10.15与编辑联系
10.27正在审查中

Submitted to journal on 10.11
With editor on 10.15
Under review on 10.27

(0) 讚！ | Handsowei

Avoid lightning A.F.W. Willoughby edited, searched many articles on concrete, the results said the direction did not meet the requirements, and asked me to switch to chemical surface coatings... really annoying rubbish.

(0) 讚！ | ......0

Please record the submission status:
10.11 submitted to journal
10.15 with editor

(0) 讚！ | Handsowei

Submitted on 9.10, today is 10.14, still with editor. Why did they accept it within a month, but mine hasn't even been sent for review yet? Watch out for pitfalls.

(0) 讚！ | 游鱼梦溪

Congratulations! May I ask which editor you chose?

(0) 讚！ | 汉斯小木屋

9.3 submit
9.16 moderate revise
9.24 rework
10.1 accept

(0) 讚！ | vanperise

The reviewers are very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | vanperise

Is it very slow recently? Submitted on 9.10, still with editor on 9.29, don't know if it has been reviewed technically! Such a waste of time.

(0) 讚！ | 游鱼梦溪

Why can't I find the review progress in Aizhuwei? Does anyone know?

(0) 讚！ | momo6688

8.14 submitted
8.21 with editor
8.28 under review

(0) 讚！ | momo6688

I am also moderate modifications. After the rework, will the editor continue to submit for review?

(0) 讚！ | 大师傅似的

Submission on August 10, 2024
August 15, 2024, revised format, under review
.....under review
August 20, 2024, Moderate modifications
August 30, 2024, revisions requested
September 1, 2024, accepted

(0) 讚！ | 我的未来不是梦

2024.7.9 submit to journal
2024.7.12 with editor
2024.7.18 under review
2024.8.5 required reviews complete by two reviewers
2024.8.30 reviews complete, decision in process
2024.9.2 reject
Laughing, after almost a month of waiting for reviews, I haven't prompted, and they just gave this result. It's better to reject early if you're going to reject, to not waste each other's time. One reviewer recommended major revisions while the other probably recommended rejection (it didn't show whether it was a rejection). They didn't deny the originality of my work, just pointed out some grammar and content issues. It's really frustrating. The editor is also frustrating, taking so long to process the reviews. It seems like this journal isn't for just anyone to submit to. The editor didn't even give a reason for the rejection, just a simple "we must turn this paper down." It's really laughable!!!

(0) 讚！ | 广化牛马

Submitted in May, with editor for over 20 days. Heard from a colleague that her manuscript was with the editor for close to six months. After submitting numerous times, I decided to write my first reminder letter and send it for review. By mid-July, the reviewers' comments came back, with four reviewers. The editor provided moderate revisions. It was surprising to have four reviewers for a journal in the fourth district, as I usually encounter 2-3 reviewers for articles in the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Submitted the revised manuscript on July 24, and by August 1, the status of the manuscript changed to "Required Reviews Completed." As of August 29, the status remained unchanged. I sent a second email asking about the status, and the system responded not to worry, as the editor was handling it. In the end, the results will be shared with everyone. In conclusion, if you are in a hurry to publish your article, do not submit to this journal. It seems that this journal lacks standard procedures for handling manuscripts and is entirely at the editor's discretion. They can choose as many reviewers as they want and take as much time as they desire. If you are lucky, it may be faster, but if not, waiting for over six months is entirely normal. This is the first time I have encountered such an irresponsible journal, no wonder its sister journals are also experiencing issues.

(1) 讚！ | 修罗正义

... After one month of review, both reviewers gave positive feedback, affirming the innovation and performance of the paper. However, one editor provided some very general comments, and then the chief editor said "we must turn this paper down" and rejected it. ...Why did the editor have feedback for me if they were just going to reject it after review, wasting one month of time, sigh... (Both editors are Japanese... I hope it's not discrimination)

(0) 讚！ | 不畏风雨勇毅前行

I submitted an article before, submitted in August, found reviewers in December, and accepted in February. This time I submitted another article, found 2+ reviewers in 2 days, very fast, hoping for a quicker process.

(0) 讚！ | 吃瓜吃瓜2022

The second revision has been completed, submitted on June 28th. This revision went very smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | 潇洒哥

I received 6 sets of review comments in the end, all of which were rejection. Now the second article has been reviewed by one reviewer, and another reviewer has accepted the invitation but has not completed the review yet. I have also invited 2+ reviewers, but I don't know how many reviewers will participate this time.

(0) 讚！ | 潇洒哥

I have also completed two reviews, but I am still under review. Are there usually three reviewers, bro?

(0) 讚！ | Jun

How are you, brother? Why does mine only show 2+ without showing the specific number of people, currently 2 have been completed. It hasn't been updated for two days, I don't know if it's waiting for good reviews to be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Jun