This morning I woke up with the status "Required Reviews Completed".

(0) 讚！ | 三鲜~

It has been five days, and there has been no response.

(0) 讚！ | Echo stag

Overall, from a personal perspective, I really don't recommend submitting to this journal (especially for those who are about to graduate and in a hurry). The review speed is really hard to describe, and those who don't believe can check the actual time intervals for the journals they accept. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness is low, with such expensive page fees, the relative service is still lacking. For those who have already submitted, it's a pity, but for those who haven't, please be cautious. I hope everyone's submissions go smoothly, we are all in this together!

(0) 讚！ | Lucky366

On March 17th, 26 people were invited, and another reviewer accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | 三鲜~

The submission was made on January 27th, and sent for review on January 31st. During the process, the editor has been searching for reviewers and has invited 20 people. Currently, there is only one kind reviewer (received the review on February 26th and completed it on March 9th, very quickly). Looking forward to a good result~ It has been an anxious wait for over a month~ I wonder how much longer the anxiety will last~ Hope for an acceptance!

(0) 讚！ | 三鲜~

The editing process is very fast and highly valued, the reviewers are also very efficient, and the total time spent is less than two months (1.6~3.3)! I wish the journal can regain the top position in the first zone! Keep up the good work!

(0) 讚！ | 烤包子古丽

The review process was quite fast, and the editors responded promptly. The two reviewers raised over a dozen questions, which were addressed in the revised manuscript and accepted for publication directly. It took about two months in total, which is considered quite fast. However, the speed also depends on whether the editors and reviewers are interested in your research.

(0) 讚！ | 请输入昵称xxx

1.2 submit
1.26 major revision
2.11 revised submitted
2.23 reject

(0) 讚！ | 昊顺利录用

Guys, how many days in total does RRC last? Today is my 14th day.

(0) 讚！ | 妞妞XC

Are you watching the editor at this house? Mine is also very slow, very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 妞妞XC

I'm afraid I may have encountered the same editor as you. It's been two weeks since RRC, and there has been no news. What should we do?

(0) 讚！ | 妞妞XC

Submitted on December 7th, received the first round of review comments on January 14th, with two reviewers providing a total of 17 comments. The comments were very professional and required minor revisions. Submitted the revised version on February 8th, and it was accepted on February 22nd. The editorial process was very fast, and I am honored to have my work accepted by this journal!

(0) 讚！ | zw516

How did it turn out later? How long did it take to get reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | Lucky366

Dec 11, 2024 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | RandomG

WE3 weeks no movement, send it for review or reject it decisively, speechless.

(0) 讚！ | 违规批萨

The submission made in early August was rejected after two rounds of review. Although the process of revision was tough and resulted in rejection, it is necessary to take their professional opinions seriously. The modification process indeed improved the quality of the manuscript. It was eventually accepted by a slightly lower-level journal, which is still commendable.?.

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau

After another two weeks of waiting, it has been a total of one month since RRC, and the editors still haven't taken any action. Do you guys know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | cast_alloy

Is this journal focused on mechanics?

(0) 讚！ | Jack_ABC

Hey guys, how is this journal rated in the industry?

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau

Two days after submission, it was with the editor, and it was not under review until three weeks later. Four weeks later, it reached the reviewer recommendation committee (RRC). This status has been maintained for over two weeks now. The time in the hands of the editor is longer than that of the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | cast_alloy

In the first round of review, three people were invited, one accepted the review, and the other two were done in two weeks. There was no second reviewer for a long time, waited for more than three months, invited 17 reviewers ??, and finally accepted after three rounds of revisions. The editorial department works very quickly, it really depends on the reviewers...

(2) 讚！ | Chang

投稿日期为8月7日，接收日期为9月16日。中间进行了一次小修正，整体进度很快。编辑们非常给力。

(0) 讚！ | Iron man

Can you come back to District One this year, bro?

(0) 讚！ | 豆沙月饼

Do the editors know how long the reviewers have to review the manuscripts? It's been over three weeks since it's been under review, and there hasn't been any response yet...

(0) 讚！ | cast_alloy

As a newbie, I feel it's difficult. Now the Chinese Academy of Sciences tends to favor our country's own SCI journals for partitioning.

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau