The fee for the page layout is $3200, which is equivalent to more than 23,000 RMB

(0) 讚！ | 风的伴侣

The fee for layout is more than 2000 RMB

(0) 讚！ | 为了你的爱

The review process was very fast over the past month. This is the first article I have written during my second year of graduate school. I am very grateful to the kind reviewers and editors

(1) 讚！ | 为了你的爱

2024.6.1 Minor revisions
2024.6.7 Submission of minor revision materials
2024.6.10 accepted 
When submitting the revised files, the graphical abstract and highlights could not be submitted due to the file format. After consulting, it was found that PDF format is not supported. After submitting in PPT and DOCX formats, there were no issues. Otherwise, this minor revision step may not have been necessary

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau

Have you got any updates? It's been half a month for me, still in the hands of the editor

(0) 讚！ | 风的伴侣

Submission on June 4th
Review on June 5th

(0) 讚！ | 重走青春

It's been half a month and it's still in the editor's hands

(0) 讚！ | QZLA

How many days after submitting will there be a response, it has been many days since the editor last updated

(0) 讚！ | 风的伴侣

Is this journal fee-based?

(0) 讚！ | 顺利毕业sisi

2024.2.27 submit
2024.3.10 under review
2024.4.20 decision is revise and resubmit
2024.5.11 revised submission
2024.5.14 completion of re-review, awaiting response
Currently no news, can anyone share how many days after the re-review RRC received a response?

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau

What's the latest news, boss?

(0) 讚！ | luzh_cau

2023/11/13 Submitted
2024/01/02 Revised with over 30 comments
2024/01/11 Revised submitted
2024/02/15 Revised with 6 comments
2024/02/19 Revised submitted
2024/03/04 Accepted
I am speechless, the first editor after the initial revision is not taking care of it for some reason, dragging me for over a month between the first and second revision, and then the chief editor handled my article. The first editor is AJG Lunt, everyone please be careful, so irresponsible

(0) 讚！ | Cheney

I have never seen so many issues during the proof stage of submission before. The production editor was very irresponsible, and I had to make a lot of changes during the proof stage

(0) 讚！ | 少吃多动

After being hired, the editor did not return the final version for the proof to me, which led to multiple spelling, formatting, and citation issues when the webpage was published. When I immediately sent an email to the editor, they said they could not make changes and that I needed to submit a correction template for the next issue.

As far as I know, changes can be made until the publication is released to the WoS database. Why should the author bear the responsibility for mistakes made by the editor themselves? Am I supposed to publish a correction for a few missing spaces, inconsistent formula formats, and spelling errors? I pointed these out during the proof stage, but problems still occurred when the editor converted to webpage and PDF formats. After paying such a high page fee, is the production department's editor not taking their job seriously?

(1) 讚！ | 小兔兔也要科研

Finally back to normal. The second quarter

(2) 讚！ | LabXu

Hello, how is your article doing now? I have been under review for over a month, and so far only one reviewer has provided feedback. The other two reviewers haven't given any updates since the day of submission

(0) 讚！ | 家明

MD revise on December 21 (20 suggestions from two reviewers

(0) 讚！ | xuanxi

MD revised on December 21 (20 suggestions from two people

(0) 讚！ | xuanxi

Required Reviews Completed on December 19th

(0) 讚！ | xuanxi

On December 18th, three reviewers received the revised feedback

(1) 讚！ | xuanxi

November 23 with editor
November 30 under review (invited 8, accepted 1

(5) 讚！ | xuanxi

Received on November 10th, the result is good after all. The reviewer's comments were positive and thorough, and the editing speed was also satisfactory. Wishing the journal continued success!

(0) 讚！ | yilin3931

2023.8.7 submitted
2023.9.19 minor revision
The first review cycle took a bit long, with 33 reviewers needed to complete the review, and both reviewers and editors provided quite positive feedback.
2023.10.10 received in revised form
2023.11.13 accepted
It took about 3 months, which is the average review period for this journal, focusing on additive manufacturing alloy control and in-situ testing

(4) 讚！ | 江南见雪时

2023.8.26 Submission
2023.10.30 Major revision
2023.10.12 Minor revision
2023.10.16 Accepted
The work on additive manufacturing simulation, with two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision, has received relatively positive feedback from the reviewers and the journal has also been quite efficient, although the open access fee is a bit expensive. Thank you to the reviewers and editors for their recognition of the work, and I wish the journal continuous success

(2) 讚！ | 枫继续吹

This speed is really slow, I'm out of patience already.
Submitted on April 15th
Received feedback from two reviewers at the end of June, with 20 days to revise
Resubmitted revised manuscript at the end of July
Now it's the end of October...still no feedback from the two reviewers

(3) 讚！ | yilin3931