April 1, 2024
Submitted. In the hands of Editor-in-chief Professor J.M. Niedzwecki.

April 5, 2024
Editor invites two reviewers.

April 13, 2024
Reviewer one completes review.

July 29, 2024
Reviewer two completes review.

August 2, 2024
Reviewer one raises a question, reviewer two's comments are detailed, minor revisions are made and resubmitted.

August 21, 2024
Reviewer two has no comments, reviewer one starts to be difficult, stating that the article, experiments, and simulations are good, but lack innovation (not mentioned in the first round???).

August 23, 2024
Revised and resubmitted.

September 3, 2024
Editor invites reviewer one.

September 16, 2024
Reviewer one accepts the invitation.

As of September 30, 2024, still under review.
The editor is responsible, but the journal has low constraints on reviewers, leading to slow review speed (reviewer two) and varying reviewer levels (reviewer one). It is a well-established journal in the field of ocean engineering, those not in a hurry can try, but those eager to graduate should consider submitting to the neighboring journal Ocean Engineering.

(0) 讚！ | 科研苦命人

It's a great journal and worth submitting to! The processing time may be a bit slow when the editor is busy. I sincerely hope that the impact factor can increase this year, as the current 3.9 is a bit low

(0) 讚！ | Kop-shu

This submission was fast, and the comments were very constructive. There is a noticeable improvement after the revisions. The feedback from the reviewer was prompt. Keep up the good work!

(0) 讚！ | 醋醋

2022.11.11 Submission 
2022.11.12 Under Review

Translation:
2022.11.11 Submission 
2022.11.12 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | XP_Wang

The journal is a good journal. Those who are not in a hurry can submit it. Submission date: Sep 07, 2021. 
With the editor for one month. 
Under review for 5 months, with one change in the middle, which should be the review comments coming back. 
Required reviews completed for one month. 
Decision in process for two weeks. 
Revised after one and a half months, with a total of 12 questions from two reviewers. 
With the editor for one month. 
Under review for 3 months. 
Decision in process, the result came out instantly. 
Revised and returned after one day, with one question from one reviewer [want to curse here]. 
With the Editor + Under review for 2 weeks. 
Decision in process for one and a half months, actively asking for an update. 
Accept on Nov 07, 2022.

(1) 讚！ | JunjieZhu

After a year of experience, finally hired. The review requirements are strict, except for the long time, the quality of the article can be guaranteed.

(0) 讚！ | Cauccy

I have been submitting for over a year. I made a revision after 8 months, and it took almost another half year for it to be reviewed. I have been under viewer the whole time. I have read some comments from the host, and I urged them to make a decision, but I am too afraid to keep pushing. However, there is still no result and I am really frustrated. I am stuck in a dilemma. If I don't push, I'm afraid of wasting time. If I push and they reject it, it will be a waste of over a year. Sigh, everyone should be cautious when submitting.

(3) 讚！ | Cauccy

I have been studying ocean engineering for over a year now.

(0) 讚！ | nx222

The first review comments were received 7 months after submission. After the revised submission, there has been no news for 4 months. It is indeed a good journal, but it has a long review cycle. I also heard that many people reviewed manuscripts very quickly, and I hope they can share their experience.

(4) 讚！ | 哈哈地瓜

One of the best journals in the field of ocean engineering. The quality requirement is very strict, and the review speed is not fast. Those who have confidence in your article and are not in a hurry to graduate can try it. I published 2 articles, and they went through a lot of twists and turns. The first article took 18 months back and forth, and I revised 6 times in the middle.

(1) 讚！ | researcher bin

Under review for 11 months, I was not in a hurry at the time so we didn’t urge it; later it kept under evaluation for 2 months, we urged the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in-chief replied that the scope does not meet, WTF! ! ! ! ! ! ! Under review for so long a time and the scope is wrong???!!! A whole 13 months was wasted . . . I can’t deny that the journal is indeed a good journal, but it’s a bit disgusting for doing so. When you submit it, you must set a psychological expectation.

(0) 讚！ | ccbozeman422

The draft submitted in early July this year, up to April, status: Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has been waiting for results, fast threeMonths, it is possible to have a cup

(0) 讚！ | 匿名