X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

Marine Pollution Bulletin

期刊標題檢索 MAR POLLUT BULL 最新評論: I encountered a very irresponsible editor. I submitted my article on A... (2024-09-30)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[Marine Pollution Bulletin]您好,您是該頁面的第 215519 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱Marine Pollution Bulletin Marine Pollution Bulletin
LetPub Score
7.3
54 ratings
Rate

Reputation
7.8

Influence
6.5

Speed
8.7

期刊簡稱MAR POLLUT BULL
ISSN0025-326X
E-ISSN1879-3363
h-index147
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.201.4451.217
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Aquatic Science
Q17 / 247
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Oceanography
Q15 / 145
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Pollution
Q125 / 167

自引率 (2023-2024)17.00%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
Marine Pollution Bulletin is concerned with the rational use of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, the seas and oceans, as well as with documenting marine pollution and introducing new forms of measurement and analysis. A wide range of topics are discussed as news, comment, reviews and research reports, not only on effluent disposal and pollution control, but also on the management, economic aspects and protection of the marine environment in general.
官方網站https://www.journals.elsevier.com/marine-pollution-bulletin
在線稿件提交https://www.editorialmanager.com/MPB
開放訪問No
出版商Elsevier Inc.
主題領域环境科学
出版國/地區ENGLAND
發行頻率月刊
創刊年1970
每年文章數1287每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比19.96%
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q1

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESSCIEQ173/358
MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGYSCIEQ15/119
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0025-326X%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s)
來自Elsevier的數據: Average 12.2 Week(s)
競爭力 *來自作者的數據: About 75%
在線文章發布時間來自Elsevier的數據: Average 10.9 Week(s)
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【Marine Pollution Bulletin】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIESH-index: 87

    CiteScore: 10.00
    HARMFUL ALGAEH-index: 75

    CiteScore: 12.50
    FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGYH-index: 103

    CiteScore: 7.50
    AQUACULTUREH-index: 152

    CiteScore: 8.60
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGYH-index: 112

    CiteScore: 6.90
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGYH-index: 139

    CiteScore: 5.90
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGYH-index: 93

    CiteScore: 6.80
    JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGYH-index: 114

    CiteScore: 6.50
    CORAL REEFSH-index: 101

    CiteScore: 6.80
    BIOFOULINGH-index: 77

    CiteScore: 5.00
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    AQUACULTURE226620
    FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY170844
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY112421
    CLEAN-Soil Air Water79678
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY65906
    HYDROBIOLOGIA64883
    HARMFUL ALGAE58501
    MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY57185
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY55840
    AQUATIC SCIENCES39332
  •  

    Marine Pollution Bulletin Marine Pollution Bulletin
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)
  [Marine Pollution Bulletin] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: 大海啊全是水


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-30 14:30:03 評論於
I encountered a very irresponsible editor. I submitted my article on August 7th, and it has been "with editor" for 20 days. I sent an email to urge them, and finally it was sent for review on August 28th. The editor only sent out 7 invitations on that day, and only 1 was accepted. Then a month passed, during which there was no progress. They did not send out new review invitations, and the person who accepted the invitation was clearly overdue, but they did not follow up. It is really frustrating.
(0) 讚! | 大海啊全是水

作者: walk & learn


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-26 20:34:16 評論於
Submission on August 1, 2024.
Revision on September 16, inviting a total of 21 people, 3 reviewers accepted the review, and 2 reviewers submitted their review comments. Thanks to the diligent editor! Thanks to the reviewers for their professional editing suggestions!
On September 23, under review with editor.
On September 25, one reviewer accepted and completed the review.
Waiting...
(0) 讚! | walk & learn

作者: Yaoo.


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-08-31 10:41:42 評論於
Submission on May 12, 2024
Minor revisions on July 10, 2024
Resubmission after revisions on July 23, 2024
Acceptance on July 24, 2024
Proofing on July 29, 2024
Online on August 2, 2024
(0) 讚! | Yaoo.

作者: 大海啊全是水


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-22 09:26:37 評論於
Just afraid of this
(0) 讚! | 大海啊全是水

作者: 大海啊全是水


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-22 09:24:42 評論於
Submitted on August 7th, it has been with the editor until now. Has the editor gone on summer vacation and stopped processing manuscripts?
(0) 讚! | 大海啊全是水

作者: 老老韩


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-06-29 15:29:56 評論於
Your luck is pretty good. I am speechless. One article was submitted here, and for some reason the editor invited 4 reviewers, 2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, and 1 rejection. Then the editor rejected it without giving a chance for major revisions; another article was also submitted here, with two major revisions, and after revisions, it was rejected. Yes, you read that right, it was rejected directly after major revisions, I am speechless. The review process for both articles took around 3 months, very slow.
(0) 讚! | 老老韩

作者: ChengyinLi


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-18 10:17:22 評論於
Why does the number of review invitations for MPB decrease?
(0) 讚! | ChengyinLi

作者: 奔跑的骏马


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-06-01 20:34:39 評論於
March 5 submitted
March 5 with editor
April 5 with editor
May 5 with editor
May 31 "Unfortunately, after an initial evaluation, I feel your manuscript is not appropriate for this journal's readership." 
Waited for three months, only to receive a rejection after an initial evaluation. I have seen low-quality journals, but this experience with this journal is the worst, I do not recommend submitting articles in a rush to this journal, as it could delay graduation. The editor in charge of the manuscript has a much slower response time compared to what we have seen on letpub. We will not be submitting to this journal in the future
(0) 讚! | 奔跑的骏马

作者: complexcc


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-05-17 10:11:16 評論於
Same question! What level of journal is MPB? The impact factor is not high, and neither is the ranking. The same goes for ECSS
(0) 讚! | complexcc

作者: 24March


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-03-13 19:54:48 評論於
Dear friends, may I ask how well recognized this journal is in the industry? I've noticed that many experts tend to publish their reviews in this journal as well as in the low-impact journal of estuarine coastal and shelf science. Why is that?
(0) 讚! | 24March

作者: tianyeouc


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-02-15 16:23:55 評論於
9.28 Submitted
10.29 Received reviewers' comments: Two reviewers, minor revision and major revision (major revision requires extensive data reprocessing)
Due to time constraints, rebuttals were made to the major revision comments and sent back to the two reviewers
12.17
Reviewer comments: One acceptance, one likely rejection, editor provided a chance for revision, stating: if unable to make serious revisions, tendency towards rejection
Entire data reprocessed, figures redrawn, discussion revised
12.30 Submitted revisions
2024.01.28 Accepted
Wishing the journal continued success!
(0) 讚! | tianyeouc

作者: Pudding77


領域: 材料科学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-07-31 23:50:04 評論於
April 4th submitted
April 6th with editor
April 7th under review
July 13th completed review
July 20th submitted
July 24th accepted
July 31st published
- Finally accepted. Overall, the efficiency of the editor was quite high, but there were some difficulties during the external review. It took from April 7th to June 25th to find the first reviewer, and the opinions of three reviewers were not completed until July 13th. Two of them required minor revisions, and one accepted it directly. Although the review process was relatively long (probably due to the lack of available reviewers in the field), the reviewers were still very nice and thorough. They provided good suggestions for the graphical abstract, introduction, and even highlights. Overall, there were no major issues, and Editor Gui-Peng Yang did a great job and directly ensured its acceptance.
- The journal is still very good, although its impact factor has decreased a bit this year. It used to be a top journal in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Tier 2. I hope it will continue to improve this year. Best wishes for the continued success of the MPB journal!
(1) 讚! | Pudding77

作者: lapluring


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-05-03 19:31:28 評論於
I submitted it pretty quickly last year, and it took seven days without being reviewed. I sent an email to inquire and they said the editor-in-chief was still evaluating it. Then, after another seven to eight days, it was sent for review. The comments from the first reviewer will determine the overall efficiency of the editor-in-chief, which is quite high.
(0) 讚! | lapluring

作者: 不知道什么名字好


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-02-23 14:50:35 評論於
14 Feb 2023 Submitted
16 Feb 2023 With Editor
23 Feb 2023 Still With Editor, may I ask how long until it can be under review or rejected? I'm in a bit of a hurry to graduate.
(0) 讚! | 不知道什么名字好

作者: daliushu


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-10-25 20:56:01 評論於
Submitted to acceptance in less than 2 months, thanks to the swift handling of the editor and reviewers, without any delays or dragging. Hoping to be in the top 2 districts by the end of the year.
(1) 讚! | daliushu

作者: lapluring


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-10-08 16:08:22 評論於
07.19 submitted to journal
07.21 with editor
08.05 under review
08.12 under review (date changed)
08.26 required reviews completed
08.30 major revision
09.27 revision submitted
09.27 with editor
09.28 under review
10.04 required reviews completed
10.08 accept
--- Finally accepted, the overall efficiency is very high, but unfortunately, the Chinese Academy of Sciences ranked it too low. I wonder if it will still be classified as a third-tier journal in the upgraded version this year.
--- After making the changes and submitting it, it went under review the next day. The efficiency of the chief editor is high!
--- Three reviewers were found, but the editor only adopted two opinions, one major revision and one minor revision. The editor gave a major revision, with three months for revision. This is the first time I have seen such a long revision time. Keep revising!
--- Overall, it's quite fast. Previously, I submitted to General Environmental Pollution and Journal of Hazardous Materials, but they were not sent for review. Finally, Molecular Plant Biology was sent for review. I hope it gets accepted.
(1) 讚! | lapluring

作者: lapluring


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-08-28 11:22:37 評論於
07.19 submitted to journal
07.21 with editor
08.05 under review
08.12 under review (date changed)
08.26 required reviews completed
08.30 major revision
09.27 revision submitted
09.27 with editor
09.28 under review
10.04 required reviews completed
10.08 accept
---Finally accepted, the overall efficiency was very high, but unfortunately it was assigned to a low-ranking journal. I wonder if it will still be classified as a third-tier journal in the upgraded version this year.
---After making the changes and submitting, it went under review the next day. The efficiency of the editor-in-chief is really high!
---I found three reviewers, but the editor only took two opinions - one major revision and one minor revision. The editor requested a major revision, giving a three-month timeframe for revisions. This is the first time I've seen such a long revision period. Keep making changes!
---Overall, it was quite fast. Previously, I submitted to General Environmental Pollution and Journal of Hazardous Materials, but they were not sent for review. Finally, it was sent for review by MPB. I hope it gets accepted.
(0) 讚! | lapluring

作者: chq


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-16 11:33:14 評論於
5.25 submitted, 5.26 under review, until now still...
(0) 讚! | chq

作者: chq


領域: 数学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-12 13:14:09 評論於
The second day after submission, still under review after 18 days...
(0) 讚! | chq

作者: 每日期待毕业


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-12 12:36:45 評論於
Posted on February 1st, under review since February 24th. In between, it changed on April 8th, May 10th, and June 8th. It has been under review until now. Is there anything longer than this waiting time? I'm about to cry.
(0) 讚! | 每日期待毕业

作者: chq


領域: 数学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-11 11:57:57 評論於
Translated into English:

On May 25th, I submitted an article to the Marine Pollution Bulletin. On May 26th, it showed as "under review," and it has been under review ever since. I would like to ask any experts who have recently submitted to this journal, how should I interpret this situation?
(0) 讚! | chq

作者: 水环境菜鸡


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-06-02 16:36:25 評論於
Another submission in late December 2021, returned for revisions by the end of April, and accepted for publication one month after the revisions. Compared to EP and the overall environment, the difficulty is indeed much lower, but the review and editing process is very slow. The chief editor is still alright, but the processing speed of several associate editors is really slow. Each time, it takes a month to wait in the hands of the editor. Taking advantage of the fact that it is still a second-tier journal, I have published two papers in it. By the end of the year, the basic scoring zone will no longer exist, and it is highly likely that this journal will be upgraded to a third-tier. It is not worth submitting to it again.
(0) 讚! | 水环境菜鸡

作者: 寒江独钓


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-05-02 09:51:00 評論於
2021.07.26 Submitted to the journal
2021.07.27 Manuscript number assigned
2021.08.10 Under review
2021.11.27 Accepted subject to review
2022.01.06 Revised submitted
2022.01.07 With editor
2022.02.01 Under review
2022.02.27 Major revision
2022.04.02 With editor (submitted)
2022.04.07 With editor
2022.04.09 Under review
2022.04.30 Accepted
The whole process was quite arduous, experiencing two rounds of revisions, but it was also due to flaws in my own paper. After 10 months, it was finally accepted, and the outcome is good. I hope the journal continues to improve.
(1) 讚! | 寒江独钓

作者: 水环境菜鸡


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-03-21 10:01:26 評論於
I submitted two articles by the end of December 2021. One of them was accepted after two rounds of revisions, taking three months from submission to acceptance. The other article is still under review. The timeline for the accepted article is as follows for reference:

December 30, 2021: Submitted
January 3, 2022: With editor
January 20, 2022: Under review
February 7, 2022: Major revisions
February 14, 2022: Returned
March 1, 2022: Two new reviewers invited, further revisions requested
March 10, 2022: Returned
March 21, 2022: Accepted
(0) 讚! | 水环境菜鸡

作者: eaar


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-01-23 16:57:17 評論於
Catching up with Christmas, but it didn't delay much. In less than a month, thanks to the editor Michel Boufadel for his high efficiency in handling, the revision was completed and accepted. Previously, it would usually take about a month to receive the results for this submission.
(0) 讚! | eaar

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)

開始撰寫 [Marine Pollution Bulletin] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*