Submitted, over a month, still under review

(0) 讚！ | 接offer

Is there a submission template on the official website of "Luminescence"? I couldn't find one. Can anyone kindly share it?

(0) 讚！ | 洛阳小哥哥

I am a guest editor for "Metals" and am currently publishing an article related to the field of phosphors. The submission website is https://www.mdpi.com/journal/metals/special_issues/Phosphor_Materials_for_High_Temperature_Applications. Further details can be discussed via email at jianglinwen@nbu.edu.cn.

(0) 讚！ | jiang393

The review speed is very fast, and feedback on the review comments is given in about 20 days. After major revisions, it was directly accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 小式式

2020.10.7 Submission; 2020.11.4 Revision comments returned, requiring a minor revision; 2020.11.22 Uploaded the response to the comments; 2020.11.29 Accepted. It is very fast in all aspects. Papers that are a little bit innovative are relatively easy to be accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 独行侠

2019.12.29 Submitted; 2020.02.09 First review comments returned; 2020.03.16 Revision made based on first review comments was submitted; 2020.05.17 Article accepted. Then the author correction followed (it was a bit delayed due to my own reasons, as I didn’t check the email in time); 2020.07.01 The article was successfully published. Generally speaking, the speed was quite fast. If you carefully revise the manuscript according to the review comments one by one, and the research content is innovative, it is still very promising to be accepted. Come on ＾0＾~

(0) 讚！ | zycg

The first round of review took a month, then I made revisions and waited nearly four months for a response. The reviewers said there were no issues, but the editors didn't specify how to revise and just asked for minor adjustments. Perhaps due to my careless editing, the paper was rejected after a second review, and the whole process took about six months. It felt a bit too long

(0) 讚！ | 咏春承嗣

The first review took about one month. Then after a revision, we waited for nearly four months before there was another reply. The reviewers said that there was no problem, but the editor required a minor revision without saying how to revise. It was then rejected in less than a month after the second review, maybe due to my careless to revise the manuscript. It lasted for six months in total. A bit too long.

(0) 讚！ | 向着太阳说笑

Initial feedback on revisions will be provided approximately one month after submission. Revised drafts should be submitted within 20 days, with final acceptance occurring 3 days after submission

(0) 讚！ | 极乐艺霖

After the first trial, modify the comments after one month, modify the revised draft for about 20 days, and receive it after 3 days

(1) 讚！ | 清水浮枣

From below 1.5 points, now approaching 2 points, it is a good sign, this magazine is worth having

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Want to submit to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 东京竹韵

Don't underestimate this magazine, it demands a lot. It took me three months of experiments before they accepted it!

(0) 讚！ | 西域宛竹

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The speed is not as slow as mentioned above, the first review is done in less than a month

(0) 讚！ | 四象飞菱

Review speed: 2.0
Experience sharing: The reviewing speed is ok; however, the publishing speed after acceptance is slow

(0) 讚！ | Nydia Pater

Review speed can be, the publishing speed after receiving is slow

(0) 讚！ | 12658

It seems quite easy to pass. I submitted it in May, received some minor revisions, had a 3-month revision period. However, due to my own health reasons, I delayed for two months. After completing the revisions in early July, I submitted it back and waited for a month to receive the final acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 北海婉琳

seems to be quite easy. I selectd in May and returned to Xiaoxiu’s opinion. There is a three-month revision period. However, my own physical reasons have been delayed for two months and revised in early July.I will return it later and wait for one month to receive it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In March of this year, the first review took a month, with a basket of issues to be addressed and a three-month modification deadline. The revised draft was submitted in June and accepted directly in July, surprisingly without any further minor revisions. It feels quite satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 桃花秋梓

The first review was carried out in March. The main problem was overhauled. The revision period was three months. The revised draft was submitted in June, and it was received directly in July.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Frustrating! The review process is extremely slow. It took 3 months for the first review; one month after resubmission, it is still marked as "Not Assigned - Article Received."

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted in December last year, accepted by the end of March this year, underwent initial review for a month, major revisions were needed, submitted revisions, second review took 3 months, finally accepted. The chosen editor was from Europe and had strict English language requirements, the reviewers were very thorough

(0) 讚！ | 珉林水芸

Puted in December last year, received at the end of March this year, first month of trial, overhaul, submitted after repair, reviewed for 3 months, finally received, selected European editor, strict English requirementsThe reviewer is very careful

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted an article last October, it feels relatively smooth, the first trial ended in three months. Note that the publication speed is very slow, about 18 months

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted an article in October last year and it went smoothly. The first review was completed within three months. However, the publishing process is very slow, taking about 18 months

(0) 讚！ | Hyman Jefferson