Unless the theoretical simulation is very innovative, it won't work. The first repair usually takes around 2 months.

(0) 讚！ | huhu159

Can pure simulation without experimentation be suitable for submitting to this journal? How long does the review process usually take?

(0) 讚！ | Ran极

The current status is "revise needed", but I couldn't find a place to download the reviewer's comments in the submission system, nor have I received any emails. I have now sent an email for assistance to technical support at webmaster@lasphys.com, but I haven't received any response yet. I'm urgently seeking help online.

(0) 讚！ | huhu159

Excuse me, where can I download the revised manuscript in the submission system of laser physics? The current status is showing "revision needed," but I haven't received any emails or found a place to download the reviewer comments.

(0) 讚！ | huhu159

Is this journal charged?

(0) 讚！ | 刃雪

Do you need to submit your transfer again in the submission interface of the LP in the submission system? I checked the status, and it shows "transfer to LP," but there is no option to agree.

(0) 讚！ | malincoZM

May I ask if for this journal submission, besides the corresponding author, do other authors not need to provide an email address?

(0) 讚！ | 杰克斯派若

OL said that after the revision, the paper would be too long, and they advised me to transfer to AO, but I didn’t want to revise it. Later I submitted it to LPL. The content was not within the scope of the LPL, and it was suggested to be transferred to LP. For the approaching of graduation, I agreed to transfer and it was directly accepted. It didn't take 24 hours from it was submitted to LPL to accepted by LP.

(10) 讚！ | 看看

The 5th month is submitted for review, revised after 5 months, and received after 2 months.It took 7 months...Heart tired

(2) 讚！ | 一只小灯泡儿

Two months, no more movement, always sent to reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 一只小灯泡儿

submitted for 5 months, no review comments, tooGarbage!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

7 Submitted at the beginning of the month, has not reviewed the comments for three months?Tangled!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The manuscript submitted in May this year, three months passed or sent to reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

recently selectd for a domestic journal. In addition to the unclear opinions, the reviewers suggested to quote three LP articles from their group.Too ex

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Manuscript What are the requirements for the format?Please give pointers!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The current website http://iopscience.iop.org/1555-6611

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Upstairs said that this publication is more and more formal, just relative to the pastSay, but in general, this publication and its sister publication laser physics letters have a long way to go to gain recognition from industry peers.I am graduating from research this year, and I have nothing to look at the latest data from ISI. Most of the journal's citations are based on self-citations and references to its sister publication laser physics letters (this publication and laser physics letters often mandate cheats to cheat)).These two journals are really wonderful sister journals. It is recommended that graduate students can choose for graduation. If it is a teacher and a formal researcher, it is best not to select

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Received 28 March 2013, in final form 24 April 2013AcceptedFor publication 24 April 20132 reviewers, each person raised 5 questions, it is not difficult to answer, the modification took 10 days, and the revised draft was accepted on the same day. The information on the proofs coming today feels much better than before. I hope thatThis journal is getting better and more formal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Three months of preliminary review, two months of review, and finally acceptd.There were more than a dozen comments on the preliminary review (feeling that there should be at least three reviewers) and replied to a full three pages.Now that the IOP is in the process of publishing, it seems that the review is not led by LP itself.The review period has become longer, about three months, and there are a lot of comments on the review... It feels more and more formal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has never had the impulse to select for the second time, after a little joyNo, everyone should not select for this journal...In fact, it is the laji journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review comments have no substantive comment. Some of the articles are irrelevant. Our boss actually forbids the lab owner to select this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I am going to select for this journal, but I can't find the left 10mm font. What is 10?Who has the word template for the recently issued PL?I need it very much!I hope to get your help!QQ: 1357257827

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Now looks like the review period is very long, but the revision comments received by this journal don't help a little about my article

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

and itThe sister journal Laser Physics Letters is not notorious

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

forget it, this year's IF is more than 3, waiting to verify the joke of this influence factor

(0) 讚！ | 匿名