It's a bit tricky, it's not the era of Einstein anymore, there are too many hydrological papers in the physics annual check now, and some people have been flooding simulation articles for several consecutive issues

(0) 讚！ | Xin

A very good and long-standing magazine, I don't know why the upgraded version of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has changed to three sections, but it will definitely return to two sections later. The reviewers are very professional and ask very pertinent questions.

(1011) 讚！ | 漫天星辰花

Falling into Zone 3 serves them right. This highly esteemed physics journal has recently published a large number of works in the field of materials that are quick and easy, but of extremely poor quality. I wonder what they were thinking.

(0) 讚！ | 邹邹是我

The German Physics Yearbook has unexpectedly been upgraded and divided into three sections by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The coffins of the giants in the history of modern physics might not be able to contain their anger!?!

(17) 讚！ | 红薯哥哥

Very nice journal, the reviewers' comments are very fair.

(0) 讚！ | 彭哥哥要上天

I have consulted, and it is still SCI. Due to its similar abbreviated name with Annals of Physics, it was removed from JCR, but it was later repaired. Its 2020 impact factor is 2.993.

(0) 讚！ | 努力的逍遥

It is estimated that the impact factor has been suppressed for unknown reasons, but it should come back in the future. After all, it is an established journal with a history of several hundred years!

(0) 讚！ | 努力的逍遥

In the recently released impact factor report, this journal cannot be found. Has it been removed from SCI?

(0) 讚！ | 呃呃呃呃呃

I want to know why this journal cannot be found in the latest released impact factor report.

(0) 讚！ | 呃呃呃呃呃

Posted on April 6, 2021 under consideration
Major revision on June 1, 2021; revised on the same day
Minor revision on June 18, 2021; revised on the same day
Accepted on July 1, 2021

(0) 讚！ | zcl-888

One month after submission, the review comments were returned. There were two reviewers, and they were quite strict. It has to be said that the revisions were accepted the very next day, showing extremely high efficiency.

(0) 讚！ | yyyyy_hhhhh

The recent submission is also under consideration after being sent for review. The status will change only after receiving feedback from the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 风雪

I have also been under consideration all along. Will the status change after submission for review?

(0) 讚！ | Yjshun

Paschen's law, named after Friedrich Paschen (1889), refers to the relationship between the breakdown voltage and the pressure of a gas.

(0) 讚！ | 夏日炎炎678

May I ask why it has been under consideration for so long? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 彭哥哥要上天

It took 3 months, with revision for 2 times, and it was finally accepted. I feel that the review was still quite strict, but the speed was a bit slow. I don’t know if it was affected by the epidemic.

(8) 讚！ | MWH

In the direction of nonlinear optics. After submission, a total of 5 reviewers were invited, it underwent two rounds of review, and was finally accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 木子飞

Annalen der Physik is a Germany journal in Q2, with an impact factor of only 3.276. However, this journal is very famous. Who does scientific research knows how excellent "Annalen der Physik" is: Rudolf Kohlrausch (1854) and his son Friedrich Kohlrausch (1863 and 1876) published articles on stretched exponential; Heinrich Rudolph Hertz (1887) published article on photoelectric effect; Max Planck (1901) published article on blackbody radiation; Albert Einstein (1901) published article on capillarity; Einstein (1905) published 4 article on photons, Brownian motion, mass-energy equation, special relativity, etc.; Einstein (1907) published article on heat capacity of solids with quantized energy levels; Einstein and Otto Stern (1913) published article on molecular motion near absolute zero; Einstein's (1916) published article on general theory of relativity; Erwin Schrödinger (1926) published article on Schrödinger equation. The journal has a long history and a good reputation! It is a good journal. The editor-in-chief was efficient and the reviewers were very rigorous! The questions raised were professional and in-depth!

(26) 讚！ | zscnum2

The journal accepts articles in all directions in the physical field and belongs to a higher-level physical comprehensive journal.Focus on theoretical physics.If it is a breakthrough and significant improvement in classical physics theory, you can try to select for it.

(1) 讚！ | rp

Classic physics journal, has a great reputation in the field of physics.Three reviewers demand higher innovation and rigor.High article level articles are worth a select.

(2) 讚！ | tillworldend

Three reviewers, lasting 1 month.

(1) 讚！ | F

3 Reviewers Two negative and one positive, rejected.Looked at Planck Einstein...After all the papers were posted on

(3) 讚！ | TSING

4 Reviewers, three positives are fine.The history is very long, many of the above nobel

(1) 讚！ | SK

This is a long-standing journal (I think it was first published in 1799). Decent journal, worth submitting.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名