The corresponding author of SCI journal articles is not necessarily only one, the specific number is not fixed. This is because different SCI journals have different policies regarding the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only accept one corresponding author, if the paper has multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author will be automatically selected as the corresponding author. For SCI journals that accept two corresponding authors, two corresponding authors can be listed. All other requirements are similar. In other words, the number of authors listed as corresponding authors should comply with the regulations of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the greatest contributions to the experiments and writing of the article, and is the person whose name appears first in the list of authors. However, in collaborative work, it is common to have multiple co-first authors. There is no specific regulation regarding the number of co-first authors, and it is closely related to the workload, length of the paper, publication policies, and recognition by the institution. Generally speaking, having 2-4 first authors in an SCI paper is the most common

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Less common, mostly full Chinese name spellings

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the maximum number of corresponding authors? What is the maximum number of first authors?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

Can the author write their name in Chinese?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Is this magazine a paid magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 北风诗辰

The review comments were received within one month after submission. The reviewers were very serious, careful and professional. There were several pages of comments for revision and supplementary experiments were also required. Two months were given for revision. After the revision was completed and resubmitted, we received notification of acceptance soon. The entire cycle was about 4 months.

(0) 讚！ | orchidlee

Review speed: 10.0
Experience sharing: For manuscripts on antigen-antibody research, both reviewers and editors were very thorough and responsible. The manuscript went through several revisions before finally being accepted, resulting in a relatively long overall time frame

(0) 讚！ | Cliff Cook

The antigen and antibody direction. The reviewers and editor were very responsible. I revised the manuscript several times and it was finally accepted. The overall time was relatively long.

(0) 讚！ | baikaishui

The first trial was very slow, and the first trial was given in four months. After the completion of the second trial, it took a long time from submission to receiving for eight months.Anxious little partner cautious

(0) 讚！ | yashangzhuo@163.com

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: The speed of the first review is very slow, it took four months to receive the first review comments, and then came the second review. It took eight months from submission to acceptance, which is relatively long. For urgent friends, please be cautious

(0) 讚！ | 西域从玉

This journal editor is very irresponsible. I had a tough experience and will not submit my paper here again.

(0) 讚！ | abd

It has been 5 months since submission. I received revision notification from four months ago, but specific revisions from one reviewer are missing from the attachment. I can only make revisions based on the feedback from other reviewers. I have also informed the editorial team, but one month has passed and the manuscript is still with the same editor. The journal editor is very irresponsible and unprofessional. I will not submit to this journal in the future

(0) 讚！ | 虹雨mm

Review Speed: 5.0 Experience Sharing: Journal peer review process takes longer time and has high language requirements

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵波峻

Magazine has a long review time and high language requirements.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The review time is relatively long, with high language requirements, and the journal's level is relatively low

(0) 讚！ | Peter Raman

The "under review" status has changed several times but the status remains the same. I don't know what's going on

(0) 讚！ | 震雷宏恺

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Success Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: The review speed is too slow, it's almost been 3 months and there's still no news at all

(0) 讚！ | 震雷宏恺

Review Speed: 6.0 | Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Under review on March 10th, with date changes on April 13th, May 8th, May 18th, and May 25th, but status remained as review. What is the situation? Is it possible to receive acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | Geoffrey Norton

Review speed: 6.0 sharing experience: Even after the article is polished by a professional company and submitted, it still has language problems, and it has been revised twice

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Received at Editorial Office: 13 Sep 2012 Article revised last : 6 Feb 2013 ...... Article accepted for publication: 13 Feb 2013 Received at Elsevier: 19 Feb 2013 Journal publishing agreement sent to author: 22 Feb 2013 Offprint order form sent to author: 22 Feb 2013 Journal publishing agreement returned: 24 Feb 2013 Expected dispatch of proofs: 4 Mar 2013 Finnally Published: Volume 189, Issue 2, May 2013

This is the journey of my submission. An article on virus experimental techniques took 5 months from submission to acceptance (almost 8 months until official publication), with 4 revisions mainly due to English issues (the content was said to be impeccable). After the first technical revision by the journal, the reviewer pointed out significant English problems and requested a major revision before reconsideration... After three consecutive revisions, unexpectedly accepted on 13 Feb 2013, proofreading on 4 Mar 2013

(0) 讚！ | 折梅余馥

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: March 8th was under review, but the date has now changed to April 26th, yet it is still under review. Why?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0 
Experience sharing: After submitting the manuscript, I waited for over a month. The editor requested English revisions, and after resubmitting, I quickly received a response. I made two revisions based on their suggestions, and there were no major issues. The experience was quite positive

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名