Submitted by the end of July, the manuscript went through 3 weeks of review with the Editor, and it took 4 months to receive the results of the external review. There were 3 reviewers, with 2 recommending revisions and 1 rejecting the manuscript, ultimately resulting in rejection. Currently, JU has a large number of submissions, causing the review process to be longer, with an average of 3 months for the first review. JU has published a large number of Letters, presumably to maintain its impact factor. As an established journal, it was only categorized as a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2023

(4) 讚！ | Nabi2022

Excuse me, where did you find the font for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 坠星成风

Do I need to pay a review fee? Will my submission be rejected after review?

(0) 讚！ | Tammy Adelaide

The Journal of Urology is unexpectedly only in the 2nd tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. CAS is indeed the ultimate truth in the universe.

(1) 讚！ | Littlebush

Does this magazine currently require a layout fee? Is there a section for submissions in the submission system?

(0) 讚！ | Pamela Nora

Can I submit an article on prostate cancer in molecular biology experiments?

(0) 讚！ | Everley Whitehead

We suggest dividing the discussion of research limitations into three parts: (1) presenting research limitations; (2) explaining research limitations in detail; and (3) suggesting future research directions or improvement plans. By discussing research limitations in this order, you can clearly present the shortcomings of the research without compromising its quality and validity

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is still necessary to clearly explain the limitations of the research in the paper and to explain how these limitations have affected the conclusions of the paper, so that reviewers and other readers can understand that we have fully considered the limitations of the research. Discussing the limitations of the research work in the discussion section generally makes the article more credible. Thinking about how to overcome these limitations in future research will have a positive effect

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Do we need to specify the limitations of the article in the discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

How to Write about Limitations in a Discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

Any progress with the editor after 10 days?

(0) 讚！ | 清怡可爱吗

Do you have any progress now?

(0) 讚！ | 清怡可爱吗

I have also been with the editor for a month. What is the situation with the original poster?

(0) 讚！ | Leiharlan

I'm also wondering, it has been 20 days since my with editor

(0) 讚！ | 璃月安晴

Hello teacher, may I ask if this magazine accepts A case series and literature review? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 金山访波

What's going on with editor for one month? I submitted on March 21st, and it's still with editor on April 22nd. Feeling confused.

(0) 讚！ | pxw1237

The manuscript review is fast, with a response given within a month. There are a total of 7 reviewers, some of whom are very meticulous while others only provide comments based on the abstract. Overall, the efficiency is very high and they are very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | hualala

2022.03.12 Rejection. Three reviewers, one of whom provided me with 18 suggestions. Thankful! I will make further modifications and then resubmit!

(0) 讚！ | Han

The text translates to English as:

2021.03.06 Status changed to Required Reviews Completed.
We should know the review results in another week.
Nervous.
If rejected, the next submission will be to BJOG.

(0) 讚！ | Han

Posted on 2021.02.03, with editor for 2 weeks, sent for external review on 2021.02.16. Currently waiting.

(1) 讚！ | Han

How are you doing now, dear?

(0) 讚！ | Lauren Barnard

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 黑山醉巧

Is nephrology an option?

(0) 讚！ | 风啸格菲

May I ask if this is a journal that directly accepts articles related to urology?

(0) 讚！ | 风啸格菲

Can I submit in the field of nephrology?

(0) 讚！ | 风啸格菲