Submission on 2023.10.19;
The initial review is fast, and there will be a chance to revise for formatting issues (the email says only one chance will be given).
11.19: Major Revision (approximately 43 days given for revisions);
12.12, returned for revisions;
2024.1.2, rejected. Was informed that the similarity score was too high, only then realized that there would be a similarity check for revisions;
1.9, reduced similarity, resubmitted;
2.3, Minor technical revision (8 days given);
2.8, resubmitted;
2.15, another Minor technical revision, 5 days given;
Submitted on 2.16 in the afternoon. Accepted at 10 pm.
Wishing everyone a pleasant submission process and smooth acceptance of articles

(12) 讚！ | 骑鱼过海的猫

Is it only OA?

(0) 讚！ | wmomo

The manuscript was completed and submitted with format revision in the next semester of postgraduate period (during the Epidemic period). [Monday, March 30] It was sent for review by two reviewers. One of them could be a statistical expert; [June 3 Major revision were requested] Some grammar and minor issues were mainly revised by Reviewer 1; Six questions concerning analysis methods and statistical tests were asked by Reviewer 2. [July 17 Reply to the reviewers]. [September 3 Major revision was requested]: Reviewer 1 agreed to accept it; Reviewer 2 still felt that the analysis method was problematic, and suggested adopting verification method to revise the article majorly. [October 10 Reply to the reviewer]. [November 18 Moderate revision was submitted]. Reviewer 2 agreed to accept it but reviewer 1 asked some grammatical questions. And it was replied on November 19. [November 27 Technical minor revision was requested]. [November 29 Reply to the reviewer]. [November 30 Accepted].

(3) 讚！ | 生物码农

October 10, 2017 SubmissionOctober 20, 2017 The editorial department returns, modifying the formatOctober 23, 2017 BackJanuary 12, 2018February 15, 2018 BackApril 22, 2018April 24, 2018 BackMay 4, 2018 Technical minor repairMay 5, 2018 BackAccepted May 14, 2018The progress of reviewing is not too slow, the review of the experts is very strict, the changes are very detailed, and the language requirements are strict.

(2) 讚！ | 呵呵呵

Initial rejection, the editor suggested reducing the content and then submiting, 3 months later overhaul, 2 months minor repair, make up a small experiment, and finally published 10 months, the judges are very strict,Detailed operational descriptions require writing.In a word, slow.

(0) 讚！ | 111

Animal is a journal published by the Cambridge University Publishing Group, and it is part of a series of publications by the European Union of Animal Sciences and the British Society of Animal Science. In the field of veterinary medicine, this journal ranks 13th among 49 journals. I recently received a review from this journal, and the editor made a lot of pertinent comments. Unfortunately, the review period of the journal is usually two months or longer.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名