期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY LetPub Score 7.7
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.6 Influence 6.6 Speed 9.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | J THORAC CARDIOV SUR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0022-5223 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1097-685X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 6.10%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.jtcvsonline.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/JTCVS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Mosby Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 345每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 50.61% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-5223%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 6.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 15.7 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: Beverly Kennan 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-05 21:22:31 評論於 Research focus: Sharing of thoracic surgery experiences: After revision, it may be required to transfer to a different journal, which can be very challenging.(0) 讚! | Beverly Kennan |
作者: Beverly Kennan 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-05 20:24:41 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Research focus: Thoracic surgery Clinical experience sharing: The review process took 20 days, with over 50 comments from 4 reviewers and around 10 from the editor. After revisions, it was sent back to be considered for publication in a different journal, which presented a significant challenge.(0) 讚! | Beverly Kennan |
作者: 混元晗蕾 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-29 17:27:02 評論於 Send an email to the editor using the communication mailbox(0) 讚! | 混元晗蕾 |
作者: 排云慕悦 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-18 18:39:19 評論於 Hello, I have encountered a similar situation. May I ask how you rebutted it?(0) 讚! | 排云慕悦 |
作者: 混元晗蕾 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-04-27 19:37:55 評論於 Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Success Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: After revising twice in over three months, my paper was rejected after minor revisions and I had to resubmit. It was very frustrating. I submitted a rebuttal, and after three more rounds of revisions over the next week, my paper was finally accepted. It was a very tumultuous and painful experience(0) 讚! | 混元晗蕾 |
作者: 南风天荣 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-01-28 17:36:50 評論於 May I ask how long the second review took for you, as I am in a similar situation? I have also submitted surgery videos and a video abstract. The manuscript is being reviewed by four reviewers, a formatting editor, a chief editor, and a statistics editor(0) 讚! | 南风天荣 |
作者: 碧桃静逸 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-21 10:25:25 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 | Acceptance rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: I submitted a multi-center retrospective study, and two out of the three reviewers showed strong interest and gave high praise. They suggested some revisions before acceptance. The third reviewer also raised some questions but did not express rejection. However, the editor rejected the manuscript directly(0) 讚! | 碧桃静逸 |
作者: Earl Hoover 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-14 12:41:42 評論於 Latest comments(0) 讚! | Earl Hoover |
作者: 北海彦会 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-04-26 19:21:45 評論於 Updated: On April 26, 2022, after two months of major revisions, the second submission was still rejected. The journal has strict requirements, and the rejection was due to experimental design(0) 讚! | 北海彦会 |
作者: 北海彦会 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-02-15 20:29:16 評論於 It seems that every time the comments from the reviewers are returned, the status of the journal will be changed back to "with editor"(0) 讚! | 北海彦会 |
作者: 北海彦会 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-02-06 18:59:03 評論於 The evolving technology section that was submitted on January 28th is nearing a total of 200 allocated numbers, and the external review process was completed on February 8th. It feels a bit cold, but the progress was very quick(0) 讚! | 北海彦会 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 23:47:59 評論於 The innovativeness of an article may be assessed by searching for key words(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 彩云公子 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 23:23:25 評論於 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted a basic article and the first review was completed in 14 days. Feeling a bit discouraged now(0) 讚! | 彩云公子 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 12:10:40 評論於 It might happen(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: Darlene Pepys 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-27 18:03:31 評論於 How do reviewers use keywords for reviewing?(0) 讚! | Darlene Pepys |
作者: 破戒阳平 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-26 10:37:18 評論於 Will the reviewers use the keywords I provide to search for novelty?(0) 讚! | 破戒阳平 |
作者: 碧水承望 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-07 23:40:42 評論於 2021/10/28 Submission-With an Editor 2021/11/01 Out of review 2021/11/18 Ready for editor 2021/11/22 Editor To Complete 2021/11/24 With an editor-Does anyone know why it is back to "with editor" after the external review?(0) 讚! | 碧水承望 |
作者: Espresso多 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-06-09 18:22:07 評論於 Do I need to submit a video during the first round of review? Or is it only required when the paper is confirmed for revision or acceptance?(0) 讚! | Espresso多 |
作者: 慈悲天琪 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-12-14 22:34:54 評論於 Yes, JTCVS is very difficult now(0) 讚! | 慈悲天琪 |
作者: Merry Malory 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-11-19 21:58:32 評論於 I am looking forward to meeting you next week(0) 讚! | Merry Malory |
作者: 一条小痴瑶 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-11-19 09:15:40 評論於 Is the rejection rate for major revisions to JTCVS pretty high?(0) 讚! | 一条小痴瑶 |
作者: 东京丹兰 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-06-29 20:12:38 評論於 Very unfriendly(0) 讚! | 东京丹兰 |
作者: 孤云迎波 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-06-03 23:07:14 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Clinical cases in cardiovascular surgery, submitted for review on the same day, first review came back after 15 days, rejected 2 days later. Experts 1 and 3 raised a total of 23 questions, half of which were constructive, but both felt that the comparative methods were problematic. Expert 2 only wrote 3 lines with a total of 60 words, which were quite sarcastic and critical. In recent years, JTCVS has become much stricter than before, feeling overall unfriendly to Chinese authors(0) 讚! | 孤云迎波 |
作者: 暴风东芳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-05-08 22:28:11 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The webpage crashed while operating on the PC. I don't know if my personal experience was uploaded. The review was very fast, less than a week. It's free, but rejection is required after major revisions. The rejection reasons are very formal and do not clearly indicate specific areas of concern. The opinions of Reviewer 2 are very fair. They replied in detail for two consecutive times, from punctuation spelling to suggestions and opinions. It's been over five minutes now. Compared to a 3.6 internal journal rejection in the past, at least they can provide a lot of feedback(0) 讚! | 暴风东芳 |
作者: 暴风东芳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-05-08 21:05:41 評論於 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review responses were very quick in less than a month, but the paper was rejected after major revisions. The reviewer's comments were very practical, and the feedback after rejection was also very fair(0) 讚! | 暴风东芳 |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us