May I ask where to check whether a specific invitation to review has been accepted or not?

(0) 讚！ | COOL0111

Keep a record and submit it for review by the assigned editor the day after submission

(0) 讚！ | COOL0111

The review process is so slow. It has been a month since the review process started. I have sent it to many people but no one has reviewed it yet. Currently, only one reviewer has agreed to review it, and even after that, I have not been able to find a second reviewer

(2) 讚！ | Dreamer777

Submitted in early August, 20 days were given for major revisions. After the revisions were made, it took one week for the manuscript to be accepted for re-review, which will take approximately two months. I was too busy during the revisions and kept postponing them, but if there were no urgent matters, I would finish them in a few days. Overall, the speed was pretty fast

(0) 讚！ | yorelll

How long did it take to review the manuscript in the end? What was the result of the review?

(0) 讚！ | 长八包嘟

Hello, how long did it take for you to find a reviewer after submitting your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 长八包嘟

The journal's level is average. I submitted a short article directly, which took two months. The quality of the reviewers is still online.

(2) 讚！ | DNW

Brother, I'm the same. I'm exhausted from searching for a reviewer, but I finally found one. Still trying to find another reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | zeo

It has been almost three months now, and I still haven't found a reviewer. Most articles of this journal are reviewed and accepted quite quickly, but it is surprisingly slow in my case.

(0) 讚！ | 圣地亚哥

A little slow, it has been over two months since submission, and I still haven't found a reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 圣地亚哥

3.21 submitted
7.12 major revision
8.22 accepted
9.14 Should it be online soon?
It's been over two months and still couldn't find any reviewers... Finally found two reviewers, one for minor revisions and one for major revisions. We worked tirelessly until we were bald, but finally, it was accepted.

(23) 讚！ | HIT可爱马

It has been submitted for a month, but is still under review. The review deadline is clearly given, and I don’t know what to do if it exceeds.

(1) 讚！ | 陌上

There is a classmate above, the time has been dragged, and later it was approved, there is no reminder editor···

(1) 讚！ | 845893126@qq.com

The two reviewers asked a bunch of questions, and the editor Kurt Busch was very nice, giving the opportunity for overhaul.From submission to the final reception of less than two months, the speed is still quite fast.JOSA B has a good reputation. Personally, the actual quality of the journal is slightly higher than that of its IF.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

must give editor Igor Smolyaninov a big praise! Although the review process has a bit of twists and turns, it is finally a minor repair plus another reviewer's opinion, the editor gave the overhaul, but the opinion stillBetter modified. After the modification, wait until one week, reply to the past in the afternoon, and the editor will receive it directly in less than four hours! Like!

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈

Upstairs, submission has been two months, just reviewed the draft talent agreed to review, huh, huh

(0) 讚！ | 111

OSA's journals are very fast, based on two points: 1 is the editor's review time is generally two weeks, the longest is 4 weeks; 2, the reviewer completes the review according to the agreement.If the reviewer does not follow the agreement, it will extend the cycle.I recently encountered one, and 6.6 agreed to review the manuscript. The agreement was completed at 6.20.But now it's 7.21, and the system or editor reminded me seven or eight times, but I still haven't reviewed it.Too irresponsible, don't agree to review the manuscript if you don't have time, and delay others.The editor is also patient, has not re-reviewed the drafter, but also drunk.It will take two months for the first trial and I hope to finish it quickly.

(14) 讚！ | 酶

Submit the review within one week, give the review comments in three weeks, receive it five days after the revision, and generally see it in three months.Two of them have been selectd for very quickly.The review is very pertinent.The journals under OSA are very fast, the quality of the articles is also very good, and the theory and experiment are all possible. This journal is also an old-fashioned journal and worthy of recommendation!

(1) 讚！ | luke

There have been several articles in the article, and several articles have been reviewed above.The authoritative journal of the optical category.The impact factor is over 2.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is a journal of nice, editor is very expert, and authoritative, the submission process is very standardized, the review is also careful, professional, worthy of submission!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Good journal.The review time and modification time are controlled in about 1 month.A recent article, two reviewers.A good opinion.A language is not very fluent in the language and innovation of the article, and its review comments are highly subjective.The editor gave a chance to overhaul.After careful revision, the paper will be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Very good journal.I feel that the reviewer is very professional and the editor is also very good.I have published two articles there.I submitted the third article in early December, and I received a review opinion on the 9th of this month. I pray that this one is also in the middle!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Time is spent on reviewers. Editors looking for reviewers either have no time to review the manuscript, or do not belong to the field, do not know how to think.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The first time I wrote this journal for SCI, I was just accepted!I feel that the influence of this journal is OK, and it is very fast. It took me only one and a half months from submission to overhaul to acceptance!The editor-in-chief is also very responsible. The reviewers will usually arrange three. I have not accepted it because of a busy time, and one has not expressed my consent, and finally became a reviewer!Generally there is a big chance for modification, but it is necessary to answer every question of the reviewer!It is very suitable for junior writers like me. As long as you do things seriously, the results are somewhat different from the classic ones.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I am a laser, submitting drafts around 4.20, a reviewer, giving the results of the first trial a few days a month, overhaul, mainly language problems, feeling AP-b reviewersIt is more professional and very rigorous. The review is very careful, and some details will be very serious.The modification took about 20 days, mainly changed the language and added some details. There is a need to supplement the experiment. Due to the lack of conditions, the reply was carefully explained. Finally, the recruitment notice was received on July 4, before and after.More than two days in a few months.This also shows that as long as it is reasonable, the reviewer will not be difficult to author, O (∩ _ ∩) O ~, do not worry too much.I feel that the journal's efficiency and quality are good, and the industry's reputation is also good, worthy of submission.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名