Pretending to be high-minded, it's just an academic paper. If you don't want to collaborate, then don't publish it

(0) 讚！ | 小虫子帅

Only submissions will be viewed

(1) 讚！ | AG超会玩

Do non-corresponding authors not see any submission process for this journal? How long does it generally take for a submission to become under review after it has been submitted?

(0) 讚！ | researcher bin

I came here to make a wish, and JMPS accidentally hired me. I will try to publish one paper every two years in the future

(1) 讚！ | AG超会玩

Isn't a researcher just a job, and how much social value does he create? Being able to get by is also their skill. Speaking of which, I also want to improve my skills

(0) 讚！ | gogogogoing

What happened to the original poster later on? It seems like things have slowed down a lot recently

(0) 讚！ | meng li

It has been three months with the editor and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小弱鸡划水小能手

It has been three months since submission, and it has been "with editor" all along. I don't dare to rush them, but is this journal's efficiency really that low?

(0) 讚！ | sunny93

Call [likeke], with such a strong hostility, what good work can someone like you produce? It's truly a joke!
If you look down on someone's work, you can directly send it to jmps for comments. What's the point of embarrassing yourself here?

(20) 讚！ | shrimphand_26

Have you ever read such a crappy article by shrimphand_26? What qualifications do you have to comment on it?
Our team has published JMPs, and we don't want our hard work to be equated with such lousy articles that clearly go through a biased review process by acquaintances.
What journal have you published in, shrimphand_26? What abilities do you have to call yourself something and what exactly are you?

(0) 讚！ | likeke

Since someone is able to publish in JMPS, it indicates that they have received affirmation from the editor-in-chief and reviewers, and have reached the level required by the journal. If you keep making ambiguous remarks about others here, do you have the ability to publish in JMPS yourself?

(55) 讚！ | shrimphand_26

The first opinion is a minor revision, but the questions raised by the reviewer are very insightful. The second review directly accepts it.

(25) 讚！ | shrimphand_26

Currently cited 991 times, really impressive!

(0) 讚！ | 寻梦无痕乀*

8.27 submission;
10.02 review;
12.16 acceptance

(3) 讚！ | 画在

It has been 10 days without any movement. I sent an email to inquire, but it hasn't reached the editor yet. If it doesn't work out, they should reject it quickly, and I will switch to another journal...

(0) 讚！ | 孤心无尘

On the 9th day, the submission was directly rejected ? The reason is that although it could pique the interest of JMPS readers, the level did not meet the requirements of the journal.

(1) 讚！ | 搅局的圣徒

Submitted in January, reviewed by the end of March, major revisions in June, first round of revisions returned in August, minor revisions in the second round of review in September, second round of revisions returned by the end of October, minor revisions in the third round of review in December, third round of revisions returned in early January, and then acceptance.

(2) 讚！ | lxidea

Brother, is this journal always this slow towards the end of the year? It has been 8 days since I submitted on November 28th, and there hasn't been any progress yet. How many more days until the editor can provide a result?

(3) 讚！ | 搅局的圣徒

Brother, has this journal become so slow at the end of the year? It has been 8 full days since I submitted it on November 28th, and there hasn't been any progress yet. How many days does it usually take for the editor to give a result?

(4) 讚！ | 搅局的圣徒

Submitted on the 26th.
On the 30th, received an email notification that the article will be handled by the associate editor.
It's already the 5th, and there hasn't been any new updates in a week. I wonder if it's a cause for concern? If any experts know, please let me know.

(5) 讚！ | rock fracture

Research specializing in the derivation of analytical solutions for battery electrode analysis, four months to complete;
This magazine is generally good in the field of mechanics, but sometimes the editors make judgment mistakes;
Recently, there was an article on electrode stability analysis which lacked any innovative numerical methods. It only replaced the finite element model from other articles and published it in this magazine. The entire article is riddled with errors, showing that there is also "rat droppings." Not retracting the article really lowers the standard of the journal. This opportunistic article is despised by diligent researchers.

(400) 讚！ | likeke

Initially, there were two reviewers: one reviewer really liked the work while the other was not so impressed; the manuscript was sent back for revision. During the second round of reviewing, the editor requested an opinion from a third reviewer who gave a detailed suggestion on how to improve the manuscript. After the second revision, the manuscript was accepted for publication. The publication that got accepted is listed below: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2020.103925

(15) 讚！ | Andy

Given this circumstance, I am unable to accept your paper for JMPS. I encourage you to submit it a more specialized journal in the field and I wish you the best. We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Kind regards, Huajian Gao Editor, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

(1) 讚！ | NIU.

The manuscript was rejected after 8 days of with editor. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. While your work is interesting and worthy of dissemination in the literature, I find based on a preliminary review that it is not suitable for JMPS. Currently we receive many more interesting articles than we can accommodate and have to make difficult decisions of limiting ourselves to articles of broadest significance and interest.

(0) 讚！ | NIU.

It can be said that this journal is far worse than other journals with an impact factor of 10 or higher, but it's much better than journals with an IF of 10 or less, especially those with an impact factor of 5 or less! There are so many journals in the field of materials. Our manuscript was rejected by the journal before and then Acta Materialia accepted our paper.

(0) 讚！ | 关系户