Because the editing level is not sufficient and unprofessional, the reviewers chosen are not suitable.

(0) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

Because the editing level is not good and unprofessional, the reviewer we found is not suitable.

(1) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

The significant decrease in impact factor is due to the unfair review process. The chief editor only accepts submissions from people within his own circle, and those he doesn't know are often rejected without review. Some of the accepted articles are of poor quality, leading to a loss of credibility and readership for the journal. The chief editor is not focused on serious research, but rather prefers to publish flashy articles with little theoretical or practical value.

(0) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

May I ask, what is the current status now?

(0) 讚！ | XS2000

Too slow. Review process is super slow

(1) 讚！ | 科研混世魔王

The editor-in-chief of this magazine, Markus Buehler, is very irresponsible. The manuscript was submitted to him on May 15, but he kept dragging it until the 26th before rejecting it, citing lack of innovation, which is just an excuse! I have read similar articles in this magazine, and there is nothing significantly innovative. It seems like he just procrastinated and didn't want to review it, wasting the authors' time! Looking at the editor's resume, although the data looks impressive, it seems like he is only pursuing trendy things to seek attention. This magazine is just a publication for a small circle, and no one should submit their work to it

(1) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

Small Circle Magazine, if the editor doesn't know you, they basically won't review it. If you don't have connections, don't bother submitting

(1) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

Rejected in April 2024. Long submission time. Not recommended to try

(0) 讚！ | 往前看是一抹暖阳

Submission on November 5, 2023
Under review on November 6, 2023
Major revision on November 31, 2023
Minor revision on December 22, 2023
Submission on February 11, 2023
Required Reviews Completed on February 20, 2023
Required Reviews Completed on March 26, 2023 (status has not changed

(2) 讚！ | 往前看是一抹暖阳

11/12/2023 Submitted
01/1/2024 Major revision
30/1/2024 Revised submitted
03/02/2024 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Cheney

Have you asked for it? Do we need consent from every author?

(0) 讚！ | sgd123

After submitting the manuscript, do all authors need to confirm the information? Currently, there is no confirmation yet and the status is "with editor." Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | mulvnanche

Hello, do we need each author to confirm the information after submitting it?

(0) 讚！ | mulvnanche

Hello, after submitting the manuscript, do authors need to confirm their information?

(0) 讚！ | mulvnanche

Hello, do all authors need to confirm the information when submitting a manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | mulvnanche

This person has invested too much in OA.

(0) 讚！ | frybeef

The editor is very irresponsible. The reviewers they found are not professional at all and seem to have no knowledge in the field. It feels like the reviewers didn't even read my article. They said I didn't write certain things and that my model is wrong. The content the reviewers said I didn't write is actually covered in the corresponding section of my third chapter. If the editor had just taken the time to read my article along with the reviewers' comments, they would realize how outrageous it is. This editor is also not like editors from other journals who frequently send emails. In the rejection letter, the editor did not provide their own opinion on the article. They only sent emails for submission, peer review, and rejection. I didn't even know the editor's name before receiving the rejection letter, as the previous two emails were automated replies.

(0) 讚！ | lucyy

2023/4/24/ submit.
2023/5/24/ major revision and modification. Two reviewers are interested in the article and provide friendly feedback, giving 20 days for revisions.
2023/6/2/ resubmit.
2023/6/5/ accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 不会迷路的麋鹿

In English, the text "22年大小分区都是二区了" translates to "In the year 22, both the large and small zones are Zone 2."

(0) 讚！ | 於瑜屿玉

Two weeks after submission, there was a major revision. One week after resubmission, it was accepted. The speed was quite fast. The reviewers were very meticulous and responsible, providing detailed suggestions, which was great. 666666666.

(0) 讚！ | 於瑜屿玉

How long does it usually take with the editor? It has been a week for me already, do we need confirmation from all co-authors before it can be submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 时光印记

2022.8.5 submitted to the journal
2022.8.7 with editor
2022.8.8 under review
2022.8.29 minor revision
2022.9.14 revision submitted to the journal
2022.9.15 with editor
2022.9.17 accepted

Translated:
Submitted to the journal on August 5, 2022.
With editor on August 7, 2022.
Under review on August 8, 2022.
Minor revision on August 29, 2022.
Revision submitted to the journal on September 14, 2022.
With editor on September 15, 2022.
Accepted on September 17, 2022.

(2) 讚！ | a

Apr 21, 2022 Submission, Apr 22, 2022 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | smilesgly

Posted on January 3rd. Under review on January 9th. Required reviews completed on January 26th.

(1) 讚！ | ZHAO J C

Journal Log:
Jan 17, 2022	Editor Decision - Accept	
Nov 30, 2021	Ad Hoc from Author	support@elsevier.com	1
Jun 26, 2021	Author Submits Revision Confirmation	
Jun 26, 2021	PDF Built and Requires Approval	
Jun 20, 2021	Author Revision First Reminder	
May 28, 2021	Editor Decision - Revise

(0) 讚！ | 搬砖的皮皮虾