Could you please clarify whether the final revised version should be sent via email or through the journal's website?

(0) 讚！ | 试块搬运工

Already applied, may I ask when and how should I pay the $200? Thank you very much!

(0) 讚！ | ad6

Hello, I would like to ask if there is a requirement to pay the layout fee of $200 for this journal.

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

I am writing in the field of new energy vehicles, but my article has been rejected. It does not match the theme of the journal. Furthermore, the initial review process of this journal takes as long as 3-4 months, and the second review takes nearly 3 months. During slower periods, it can take up to 1 year. Please be cautious about submitting urgently!

(0) 讚！ | Must_pass

The first review process will take nearly two and a half months. The journal places great emphasis on the manuscript format, so it is best to seek professional editing services for English. After resubmission, there will be news in about one and a half months, which is relatively positive.

(1) 讚！ | xxzz11

OP, have you received the result of your second review?

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

Hello, I would like to ask why this trial has been going on for a month without any news yet. I haven't received any replies, so I was wondering if you have received any replies.

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

OP, have you received your second review? I have been under review for almost a month now.

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

4.20-11.7. This journal pays special attention to formatting and suggests having someone proofread the paper, providing a proofreading certificate. There are two major revisions, and after receiving feedback, the first revision should focus on formatting before receiving the official acceptance letter.

(4) 讚！ | 爱学习的小li

OP, have you received any updates after submitting the revised version?

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

10.6 The second revision response is submitted, and a response is expected by 10.31. The journal has indicated all the areas in the entire paper that do not comply with the formatting requirements and requires a response within two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 爱学习的小li

Should I be asked? I asked my junior brother last night, and he replied this morning that it is still under review at present. It has been 13 days since the second review.

(0) 讚！ | shanmama

Did you inform the original poster after you changed it back in the second review?

(1) 讚！ | xxzz11

How long will it take for you to give feedback after you submit it for re-evaluation, OP?

(1) 讚！ | xxzz11

I found a website I often use for proofreading, which is unrelated to journal publishers.

(0) 讚！ | shanmama

May I ask which organization did the original poster use for proofreading? Was it the publisher of this journal who did the proofreading?

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

Let's talk about those more than 30 opinions from 711. There are a total of four reviewers + associate editor, and five people have comments. Reviewers 1, 2, and the associate editor focus on the format and English text. Reviewers 3 and 4 focus on the content of the article. The article format mainly refers to the citation format. When my junior submitted the article for the first time, he typed it manually as he didn't know how to use software. Later, in early August, I helped him use Mendeley to automatically generate it, and that's when it became good. The content of the article was revised three times, and in the end, it was finalized with some additions and deletions. I found an institution in English and after making the necessary changes, obtained a certificate. In short, each aspect was dealt with separately.

(0) 讚！ | shanmama

Record the submission process for my junior brother:

Completed on April 25th, submitted to several OA journals, all were rejected immediately.

Submitted to this journal on May 2nd, adjusted the format repeatedly, and submitted on May 15th.

Received the review on July 11th, a total of over thirty comments from the reviewers and associate editor.

Resubmitted on August 18th.

Received the review on October 3rd, made minor revisions, only one reviewer had 1-2 comments, and also acknowledged that our article has made significant progress (exact words: "The author has effectively addressed most of my criticisms and improved the article").

(4) 讚！ | shanmama

It takes about 45 days to complete the first revision and reply. The second revision is currently in progress, and the editor is very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 爱学习的小li

The formatting requirements are quite strict. I repeatedly modified the format when submitting it. After more than 80 days of waiting, I received a reply. I made further modifications and submitted it again over a month ago, but I still haven't heard any news. I hope it will be successful!!!

(1) 讚！ | 爱学习的小li

Can the original poster add me as a friend? I have some questions about the submissions that I would like to ask you.

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

"OP, have you been waiting for so long? Did you send an email to the editorial department to remind them about the manuscript during this period?"

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

The review speed of the manuscript is slow. The first response takes about 3-4 months, and after that, it takes one month to receive a reply. Acceptance is relatively easy, but there are high requirements for English and formatting. I wish everyone good luck and hope that every submission will be successful.

(0) 讚！ | xyuy

Hello, OP. Does it mean that all his first-instance results are slow? Is this journal highly demanding in terms of innovation?

(0) 讚！ | xxzz11

Then I had to wait, I waited for four months at that time.

(0) 讚！ | xyuy