The article catalyzed by enzymes received about seventy to eighty comments in the first round, and was rejected. However, the opportunity to resubmit for revisions was given. It was mentioned at that time that it might still be sent to the same four reviewers, or new reviewers could be chosen. After three months of additional experiments, it was resubmitted and a new editor was assigned. The editor held onto it for nine days, causing a bit of panic as it coincided with the Chinese New Year. The review process was delayed significantly. After twenty-seven days, there was finally some news - it was the same reviewers as before, with two agreeing to accept and two requesting minor revisions. The revisions were made in two days and it was accepted three days later. From the initial submission on October 15, 23, to acceptance on March 1, 24, the editor at JACS was very nice, and the reviewers were extremely meticulous and professional. They were able to pinpoint key issues. In any case, it was accepted, which was fortunate.

(0) 讚！ | Herbert

The deputy editor was reassigned by the editor-in-chief a month ago, and two days later it was sent for external review. We are currently waiting for the results of the external review, which should be in less than two weeks. Let's hope for a good outcome.

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

Hey guys upstairs, how's the situation now?

(0) 讚！ | HUANG 666666

Do editors only get assigned once a week? I am also Erick, but I am the organic one, and my direction is different from yours.

(0) 讚！ | HUANG 666666

Submission on 8 Oct 2024, associate editor (Erick Carreira)

(0) 讚！ | 发布了文章的张三

Likewise, it has been a week for me as well.

(0) 讚！ | 发布了文章的张三

Hello, may I ask if you have been assigned a new managing editor recently? Or is it still Erick Carreira? I just noticed that the article I submitted was also assigned to him...

(0) 讚！ | miura

20240924 in peer review

(0) 讚！ | zhou-sy21

Hello, may I ask if you submitted the appeal directly in the ACS Paragon system? Or did you send an email to the editor-in-chief/deputy editor separately for the appeal?

(0) 讚！ | miura

It's been 14 days and still no movement...

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

Not yet, it is still in the hands of the editor. It's taking so long.

(0) 讚！ | zhou-sy21

It has been 12 days since submission, and I only know that associate editor Erick Carreira has been assigned (actually he is the editor-in-chief). How long will it take for the experts to review it? Will it definitely be reviewed by the associate editor?

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

Has it been submitted for review? How long ago was it submitted?

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

Did I see it wrong? Has it been in review for over two weeks?

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

Are you assigned to the deputy editor and only have 7 days to submit for review?

(0) 讚！ | minmin1015

20240914 assigned to associate editor (Li-jun Wan)

(0) 讚！ | zhou-sy21

20240908, Submitted to JACS

20240908, Submitted to JACS

(0) 讚！ | zhou-sy21

Can I appeal directly to the deputy editor? The editor rejected it, thank you. Can I appeal by sending an email directly?

(0) 讚！ | 玉

20240709 submitted
20240711 assigned editor Peidong Yang
20240801 Minor revision, two reviewers, scored several Highest (5%)
20240808 Resubmitted
20240813 Accept
20240816 Online

The editorial process was very fast!

(0) 讚！ | Rolen

2024.08.05 submitted
2020.08.12 assigned as deputy editor, Rahul Banerjee, not sure how this editor is for the country?

(0) 讚！ | chen1205

Oh, okay. Thanks a lot, bro.

(0) 讚！ | Xiangquan Liu

Yaghi recently attended a conference abroad and visited China for exchange, which has definitely caused a delay in handling the manuscripts.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

Seeking advice from the experts, it has been two weeks since submitting to JACS, and it has been 10 days since it reached the hands of the associate editor Yaghi. It has always been assigned to the associated editor. Have any experts ever submitted to this great editor before? Is there hope for it to be reviewed in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | Xiangquan Liu

Received the revision letter today, with feedback from three reviewers: one minor revision, one major revision, and one suggestion to submit to another journal. The editor has requested a major revision. Hopefully everything goes smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | miura

2024.03.14 submitted to journal
2024.03.30 in peer review
2024.04.23 Major revision (two reviewers, one major and one minor)
2024.05.22 Revisions submitted
2024.06.15 Accept in principle
2024.06.17 Revisions submitted
2024.06.19 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 火炎焱燚