The speed is really too slow, the review expert scoring process has been dragging on for too long. I consulted the editorial department in the middle. One reviewer quickly gave his opinion, while the other reviewer dragged on for 3 months. The editorial department didn't even help to urge. It's really too slow. Originally, it was to be accepted after revision, but after the revision, it was submitted to that garbage reviewer again, and it dragged on for another 3 months

(0) 讚！ | 九霄惊雷

Hello, I am also submitting to this journal. Can I add you as a friend to ask a few questions?

(0) 讚！ | qianyu0697

Submitted on November 20th, 23.
Waiting for reviewer assignment in early December.
Wait for reviewer comments for about a week.
Received minor revisions on January 8th.
Delayed until January 25th, 24 for revision, rejected twice due to incorrect format.
It was slow during the Chinese New Year, and it was not until around February 10th that it was sent to the editor.
Then it was sent to the reviewer the next day, but the review was not conducted during the Chinese New Year, resulting in a two-week delay.
Reviewer accepted the invitation on February 25th.
Accepted on the 26th

(2) 讚！ | 科研闲人

2.3 Submission
2.4 Rework on formatting issues
2.5 Wait for editorial review until around 2.12 for external review
2.25 Waiting for scoring after finding reviewers
Overall speed is acceptable

(0) 讚！ | xxxt

Yes, I enhanced that using an online website, typically the images I draw are below 300dpi

(0) 讚！ | 科研闲人

The image must be larger than 3.5 inches and at least 300dpi. It will be rejected if the dpi is too low

(0) 讚！ | hz2

The waiting time for reviewers is usually around ten days, and the external review process takes about a month. The revision comments came back in January, and the review speed is considered very fast for a closed-source journal

(0) 讚！ | 科研闲人

Reworked, but I just can't figure out his picture submission format no matter how hard I try. It got sent back twice, mainly because he didn't explain how to do it

(0) 讚！ | 科研闲人

Has your status changed? How long does it take to reach the next status?

(0) 讚！ | HANI

Hello, can you please provide contact information? I am also having issues with the images and don't know how to solve them. I don't understand the requirements

(0) 讚！ | ll718

Could I ask how to process images? I couldn't find how to upload a single image file in the system. I have sent you my contact information, so if you don’t mind, can I ask you for some guidance?

(0) 讚！ | ll718

20231019: Submitted to Journal
20231127: Awaiting EIC Decision
20231213: Submitted to Journal
20231220: Decision; Awaiting revision
20231222: Submitted to Journal
20231226: Accept
20240313: Proof

(0) 讚！ | lucky

Now we are waiting for the reviewers to make a decision, it's been a few days already, it's quite difficult to get reviewers' invitations

(0) 讚！ | 科研闲人

How is it going, I've been investing for a week and it's still the same EBM

(0) 讚！ | zhiwei8

Awaiting EBM Assignment, may I ask what this means? I've been waiting for a few days and it has been in this status all along

(4) 讚！ | 科研闲人

The current article has been indexed by EI, but SCI has not been indexed yet. I wonder if any experts have encountered a similar situation. The latest issue has already been indexed by SCI, but my article, which was published earlier, has not been indexed yet.

(0) 讚！ | WP2022

If I remember correctly, the manuscript was submitted on August 27th, and minor revisions were returned at the end of September. It was directly accepted and published in mid-October, which went quite smoothly. The main time-consuming part was finding reviewers, but overall, it was still a smooth process. The journal is quite responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 阿巴阿巴＋

14-Jun-2022 submitted
27-Jul-2022 first decision- Mandatory Revisions
08-Aug-2022 a revision has been submitted
23-Aug-2022 decision- Optional Revisions
25-Aug-2022 Accept as is
The process was fast, with no delay in editing here. On the first day of submission, the editor noticed a formatting issue and returned it. It was returned on the second day, reviewed by the chief editor on the third day, and sent for external review on the fourth day. After the revisions were made, it was sent for direct external review on the second day. During the second review, a minor issue with the images was raised, and it was fixed on the same day. Two days later, the chief editor accepted it directly. The topic is relevant.

(1) 讚！ | onetheodore

Hello, I also want to know if this status is for rejection or for review?

(0) 讚！ | 左岸~

Hello, how long does it take to receive the first trial opinion?

(0) 讚！ | 左岸~

Finally, it is Awaiting Reviewer Scores on 24-Apr-2022.

(0) 讚！ | Maxmuse

02-Mar-2022 SUBMITTED
19-Apr-2022 Still Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
Do not rush, please do not submit.

(0) 讚！ | Maxmuse

The current study provides an overview of parenteral drug delivery systems, including administration routes, formulation of parenterals, container types, and evaluation tests.  Parental preparations are pyrogen-free, sterile liquids that include one or more active substances in doses or multidoses.

(0) 讚！ | vijya

Why can't I open the journal website now?

(0) 讚！ | henry1910