Submitted in September 22, revised in December, accepted in February of the following year. It took six months in total, not bad

(0) 讚！ | 王悠然123

I submitted on January 19, 2023, and it is still under review as of July 1st.
Reviews completed: 0
Review invitations accepted: 0
Review invitations sent: 2+

(0) 讚！ | LiLi-Wang

Speechless. It has been four months since the first review, and so far, 20 reviewers have been approached. Only one has accepted the review. This morning, I saw three more submissions for review. Should I withdraw the manuscript? Any experts out there who can give advice?

(0) 讚！ | ccdddd

The second review is even slower than the first review, with the second review taking 3 months and the first review taking 2 months. It is possible that the second review falls during the New Year period. The second review will be accepted directly upon return.

(0) 讚！ | Gaiusyu

Submitted on August 10th,
Rejected on December 1st,
It took about 4 months, just for your reference!!!
I feel that this journal is still quite challenging, so I don't recommend submitting if there is not much innovation.

(0) 讚！ | 阿航1998

After a whole 30 days of being under review (09/30 - 10/30), it has reverted back to the "Under Review" status again!

(1) 讚！ | 阿航1998

Congratulations, brother! It should only be a matter of time before your paper gets accepted! My required status has been ongoing for 23 days, I hope for some results soon! ^_^

(0) 讚！ | 阿航1998

A few days ago, the review was released with few comments from three reviewers. The required review process lasted for about a month, maybe a few more days. The main reason is probably that the editor felt that there were too few comments from the first two reviewers, so there were hardly any changes required. The status date of the "required review completed" was updated on October 13, and I believe that was when the feedback from the third reviewer was received.

(0) 讚！ | Gaiusyu

A few days ago, the required review was completed with not many comments from three reviewers. It lasted for about a month and a few days. The main reason might be that the editor felt that there were too few comments from the first two reviewers, so there were hardly any changes required. The status date for the completed required review was updated on October 13th, and I believe that was when the third reviewer's comments were received. Overall, the entire review process took about two months and a few days.

(4) 讚！ | Gaiusyu

Okay, brother, when you have the results from the first review, please let me know. I would greatly appreciate it! Hehe

(0) 讚！ | 阿航1998

Don't panic, I've been in this state for over a month now 0.o

(0) 讚！ | Gaiusyu

Just want to ask my good brothers, "Required Reviews Completed" has been in this status for 15 days already, what's the situation?

(1) 讚！ | 阿航1998

Sep 09 2019, submitted to journal; Sep 10 2019, with editor; Sep 14 2019, under review; Nov 18 2019, decision in process; Nov 25 2019, revised; Dec 29 2019, revision submitted to journal; Jan 01 2020, with editor; Jan 03 2020, under review; Feb 01 2020, decision in process; Feb 11 2020 Revise, Feb 16 2020, revision submitted to journal; Feb 18 2020, with editor; Feb 20 2020, under review; Mar 18 2020, decision in process; Mar 19 2020, accept.

(3) 讚！ | EvenChsng

2019.5.15, submission; 2019.6.27, the result of first review was received (three reviewers), and major revision was required, there were a lot of comments, about 11 pages. The reviewers were very professional; 2019. 9.24, the revision of first review was submitted, and 16 pages of reply was written; 2019.12.19, the result of the second review was received, and major revision was still required. Two of the reviewers were very satisfied with the revised manuscript after the first revision. There was one reviewer who still had many comments, about 3 pages, and all of which were sharp; 2020.3.4, accept; 2020.3.5, proof; 2020.3.6, online. I have submitted two articles to this journal, and it took 5 months for the review of first article, and it was finally rejected. There were a lot of comments of review, and the reviewers were very professional. It took 11 months before the acceptance of the second article, and 2 major revisions were made (in fact, the review speed was OK, but it took me a long time to revise the article). The editor was very responsible, and the reviewers were very attentive. I'm optimistic about this journal (Journal of Systems and Software) and wish it better and better!

(3) 讚！ | 那小子真坏

There are a lot of suggestions for revision. Be patient, but the opinions are good!

(0) 讚！ | waxiya2@163.com

reviewing speed to see luck, sometimes less than3 months, sometimes half a year, sometimes one year, 3 to 5 reviewers of the length of the review, the modification time is 1.5 months.There have also been invited to review the manuscript and asked to complete the review in May.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted papers to the journal and I also worked as a reviewer for the journal. I feel very good about the journal. The review speed is relatively fast, and the journal divides editors into different fields based on their research direction. The editors are very responsible. I had to wait two months to receive comments from the reviewers. After revising it a few times, it was finally accepted within three months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal has been selectd for, not very well accepted.The request is still relatively high

(0) 讚！ | 匿名