3.27 With Editor: Checked with Track, no reviewers willing to review.

(0) 讚！ | Lotus_Kindon

3.26 With Edidor, is the result coming out soon? Looking forward to it.

(0) 讚！ | Lotus_Kindon

3.25 continues in peer review.

(0) 讚！ | Lotus_Kindon

3.20 in peer review (It's been a whole month, and the first review hasn't finished yet?)

(0) 讚！ | Lotus_Kindon

2.20 Submission
3.18 With Editor (switching back and forth between In Peer Review and With Editor multiple times)

(0) 讚！ | 田先生

Submitted on November 27, 2024
Reviewed on December 5, 2024
Major revision on January 18, 2025, with two reviewers mainly pointing out minor formatting issues and emphasizing the need to highlight the innovative aspects
Revised on January 20, 2025, in a rush to go home for the Spring Festival, completed the revision in just two days
Resubmitted on March 2, 2025, after waiting for over a month, fortunately the reviewers processed it quickly
Accepted on March 2, 2025
Regarding the optimization of analysis methods and environmental research, it involves horizontal conclusion, with a large amount of data work and possibly lacking in innovation. After going back and forth between different journals for over a year, finally submitted to RSC, thanks to RSC for their support.

(0) 讚！ | Aarion1209

I'm really about to cry because of this journal. Submitted on July 11, 2024, approximately a week later it was with the editor. On August 8, 2024, it was rejected and resubmitted. They asked for some additional information, but ironically, all of that was already in the original text, so I highlighted it for them. It was resubmitted on August 16, 2024, with an email detailing the changes made. It took about 3 weeks for it to be with the editor again. Then the long process of going back and forth between with editor and in peer review began (mostly with editor). And now, today, it's still with the editor. I don't understand why this is taking so long, my research is not even that uncommon. Why can't I get the reviewer's comments?

(0) 讚！ | Annita欣

I work on fluorescent probes.
Submitted on 2024.09.18
Two days later (peer review)
Minor revisions on 2024.10.20
Submitted revised manuscript on 2024.10.26
Accepted on 2024.11.01

(0) 讚！ | Helium11

Hybrid journals, offering both traditional subscriptions and gold open access options.

(0) 讚！ | 一只小虫子

Submitted on June 17th, revised on July 24th, the revisions were acceptable, and it was accepted five days after the revision. Looking forward to the impact factor increasing a bit more.

(0) 讚！ | 一颗烂番茄

Hello, is this journal truly open access after acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | 1ko2oi

2024.6.7 Already voted

(0) 讚！ | yangxinyao

1.21   submitted to journal
1.31   In peer review
3.27   Major revision
4.9   resubmitted
4.11   accepted
Review process was not as fast as anticipated. Although there were major revisions suggested, most of the issues were related to formatting. After making the necessary revisions, the paper was accepted without needing to be sent for further review

(0) 讚！ | 一只小虫子

Finally accepted! Went through a major revision and a minor revision! The editor did a great job! It's just that the reviewer seemed a bit nitpicky! But overall, I'm grateful! I hope this provides a time example for future or aspiring contributors!

(0) 讚！ | Bella

December 21st: Submission
December 28th: With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 一定能中

Hello, have you received the review results?

(0) 讚！ | aduiduidui

I have been waiting for nearly two months. Reviewer 1 has finished reviewing, but the editor has been unable to find a second reviewer for a long time

(0) 讚！ | 投搞一直被拒

I have two reviewers for my paper

(0) 讚！ | yuyuansusu

How many reviewers are there? Why do I only have one reviewer, and the second reviewer is nowhere to be found?

(0) 讚！ | 投搞一直被拒

Overall, this journal is quite friendly.
I submitted my paper on June 24th
Received revisions on August 19th
Revised paper on August 25th
Accepted on September 8th.
The reviewers' comments were very helpful, and after making the suggested revisions, my paper was accepted smoothly. The focus was mainly on traditional Chinese medicine quality control, so give it a try!

(0) 讚！ | yuyuansusu

How many reviewers does this journal usually invite? It's supposed to be fast, but it's been over a month and I haven't heard anything after submission

(0) 讚！ | 投搞一直被拒

Which editing teacher did you choose?

(0) 讚！ | okmnji

The results will be announced soon.

(0) 讚！ | 慎独

Translation:
Editor's constructive comments

(0) 讚！ | 道克特尔刘

My paper was rejected. Do I have to change journals if I didn't write for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | zqy1012