After the second resubmission for repair, Smith sent me another reviewer again. I was speechless.

(0) 讚！ | SHUOSHUO. S

May I ask you, when submitting, do I need to prepare a Graphical abstract?

(0) 讚！ | 123456wx

Thesis revision took over 5 months from submission to acceptance. The journal efficiency was very high, with responsible editors in the Asian region providing helpful suggestions. However, the editors had very high grammar requirements.

(0) 讚！ | 搬砖弄鞋

Contribution Editor Richard Smith, mainly due to language and format problems.After 14 days, it took 2000 oceans to go through the recommended professional retouching language editing and re-submitment, and it was still rejected.

(1) 讚！ | dennis

In general, Richard Smith, the editor-in-chief, is very responsible and efficient. Although he has very high language requirements, as long as he thinks the content is ok, he is As for my experience, my manuscript was with an editor at the beginning of July and it was listed as “under review” the following day. I was notified that it required a major revision in August, and it was revised and back to the editor in September. After a series of quick revisions, the paper was finally accepted in early October.willing to give you the opportunity to fix your language errors. I recommend this journal as it is a great journal in the supercritical field.

(5) 讚！ | 芬芳的年华

Edit is richard smith, is a requesting person, but will guide you how to modify.For example, my tutor is a lazy person. After editing the teaching, he successfully published

(8) 讚！ | 啊威

Supercritical field top journal

(0) 讚！ | niming

with editor After one month, the under review was given a major repair one month later. The reviewer's opinion was objective and quality.After giving two months of revision, I had something to delay, and the editor gave it another month. I received it again after reviewing it.The requirements for innovation are relatively high.

(1) 讚！ | 784157481@qq.com

Good journals, the impact factor has been falling in recent years, I don’t know why

(0) 讚！ | Xiang

The next day after the submission, the review was made. After one month, I came back to the comments and the cups. The requirements for innovation are very high.keep it up!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This year is very fast; supercritical chelation extraction of metal ion direction; Asian District Editor;

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Do you want the chart to be in pdf format?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

the first sciThe numerical calculation of the heat transfer of the supercritical fluid is written, and the review speed is about 3 months.I think supercritical heat transfer is relatively good compared to the solubility of supercritical fluids, etc. There is not much heat transfer research in this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The top journal in the field of supercritical, although the impact factor is not high, but there are not many journals in the chemical field 2.0+.The quality of the journals is good. The reviewers are mostly super-critical big cows. I have submited in one article in 10 years. The editors are very demanding on the language. They have been modified several times, and finally.If the research results are good, it is recommended to contribute to his home, the review time is about two months, generally from the inclusion to the publication within about 3 months~

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

before submiting in a review, directly rejected one dayHowever, they are invited to the

(0) 讚！ | 匿名