I am also one of the reviewers. May I ask what is the next step? How long will it take to receive feedback?

(0) 讚！ | dreamlife

After submitting the manuscript for 10 days, the editor has made a decision that the organization is specifically designated in the U.S. sanctions list, but there is no mention of the content of the article. What does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | 闹心1

I am also this editor, it's been two months and still no review results

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白兔

3.15 Revised, still no response from reviewer #3.
4.29 Major revision requested again, final feedback from reviewer #3, stating abstract, introduction, and conclusion need further modifications. Other two reviewers indicate acceptance.
4.30 Revised.
5.13 Inquired if one of the small figures is original, if not original, need to indicate the source.
5.14 Revised.
5.15 Accepted.
The speed is really slow, it feels like the AC (Associate Editor) no longer has the efficiency it used to (usually a turnaround of two months before last year), and it seems that Chinese submissions are now being handled by foreign associate editors, with efficiency being quite poor

(0) 讚！ | who石

The one I submitted on April 8th is also this teacher, but there is no news so far

(0) 讚！ | XKDeam

2024.4.15: Submission
2024.4.19: Assigned to editor Prof. Christy L. Haynes
2024.4.29: Still no news
Do you know if this editor processes manuscripts quickly?

(0) 讚！ | JM

First review took more than 50 days, with one rejection and one minor revision. The delay was due to the reviewer of the rejection taking a long time. Although the rejection was given, the scores were high, mainly for improvements in the article's structure and the need to supplement some data explanations. The editor also carefully considered the reviewer's opinions and gave a major revision based on the combined review comments. After resubmission, around 20 days later, the rejection reviewer directly accepted the article

(0) 讚！ | byakuya

Submission on December 23, 2023
Editing request to shorten the length on January 11, 2024 (Christmas holiday in between)
Revision sent back on January 29, 2024
Sent for review on January 30, 2024
Major revisions on February 26, 2024 (1 acceptance, 2 major revisions)
Revised manuscript sent back on March 29, 2024, with several experiments added
Accepted on April 11, 2024

A total of over 3 months, very efficient, very impressive!

(0) 讚！ | 03206214

December 21, 2023 Submission
December 30, 2023 Review
February 6, 2024 Lunar New Year's Eve, major revisions and minor revisions within 3 days
February 12, 2024 After finishing the revisions on the third day of Lunar New Year, also working on a fund during this time, thinking that there will be results soon, adding up to 5 AC masterpieces so far, waiting and waiting, waiting until the day before the fund submission, until March 16, when another minor revision was given.
March 21, 2024 Returned for revisions
April 4, 2024 Accepted

This time overall felt like it took too long, exceeding the average each time. The waiting was nerve-wracking! However, the end result was good. Amen!!!

(1) 讚！ | xihawuchang

Do you guys know if Professor Laura Lechuga is fast at handling manuscript revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白兔

11.26 Submitted to Nano Letters
Around 12.26, rejected and resubmitted to AC (originally wanted to submit to CEJ or Small, but decided to go with ACS for faster review process)
1.20 Major revision requested by editor
Feedback was quick, possibly because one of the reviewers was from Nano Letters before and previous submission was not appropriate for transfer, hence major revision was requested this time
Delayed during the Chinese New Year
2.26 Received revision comments, currently waiting
3.21 Accepted, just need to make some formatting changes

(0) 讚！ | 收哩收哩

1.22 submit
1.25 AE assigned (Prof. Laura Lechuga)
2.6 in peer review
3.4 revisions

(0) 讚！ | who石

On February 29, 2024, two major revisions and one rejection. The editor's decision to reject the submission is also reasonable

(0) 讚！ | 123

Have you received the result of your second hearing? It's been almost a month since my second hearing

(0) 讚！ | pg-mercury

9.7 Submission
9.7 Assignment Editor (Prof. Dr. Valérie Gabelica)
9.8 Review
10.30 Major Revision
12.7 Return
12.7 Second Review
1.19 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | silentwingszx

Ah, well. I guess it's because of Christmas? It shouldn't be this slow normally

(0) 讚！ | 123

It took almost 35 days for my submission to be reviewed, and the review process took more than a month. Now, it has been nearly a month since the second review started

(0) 讚！ | lyyy123

12.22 Submission
12.24 assigned as Associate Editor X. Chris Le
Still not reviewed yet until today, why is this editor so slow. Also, has anyone recently encountered any display errors in the ACS publish center? My submission has two records showing up (each with different statuses

(6) 讚！ | 123

First review: 40 days, with 3 reviewers. A third arbitrator was sought by the editor due to conflicting opinions.
Second review finished before Christmas, taking 20 days.
The same 3 reviewers were used, with one rejecting and one accepting the paper. The reviewer who initially asked for major revisions raised two questions and requested minor revisions

(3) 讚！ | byakuya

11.2 submit 
11.6 AE assigned 
11.30 in peer review 
12.30 rejected (Submitted for review for about a month, with two reviewers, one rejection and one major revision. The rejecting reviewer believed the article lacked innovation, and their feedback was quite harsh, without thoroughly reading the article. The editor did not provide any comments.) The editor is Prof. Laura Lechuga, and the article has been resubmitted with revisions based on the constructive feedback from the reviewers. It was a bit of a tough rejection on New Year's Eve

(9) 讚！ | Jiaweii

How did it turn out later? Are you satisfied with it now, my part is also done by this editor

(0) 讚！ | 一个达不刘a

Submitted on November 16
Assigned editor on November 18
Under peer review on December 15
It took a long time to find reviewers, hopefully will have good results!
Will continue to update progress

(17) 讚！ | 三木

Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Submitted on September 14th
Major revisions on October 23rd
Revisions on November 16th
Minor revisions on December 7th
Revisions on December 11th
Accepted on December 13th
Overall, it took 3 months, but it was relatively fast and nice!

(0) 讚！ | xihawuchang

Hello, have you updated your status? My editor is also hers. It's been two weeks already

(0) 讚！ | pg-mercury

I have submitted four papers and they are all still under review, with the latest one requiring major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 程也wd